SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. - )
Filed by the registrant ☒ Filed by a party other than the registrant ☐.
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary proxy statement. |
☐ | Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). |
☒ | Definitive proxy statement. |
☐ | Definitive additional materials. |
☐ | Soliciting material under Rule 14a-12. |
TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
☒ | No Fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Check |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement 2020 TETRA
Notice of |
To the stockholdersour Stockholders:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of TETRA Technologies, Inc.:
Our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“TETRA” or the “Company”) will be held as follows: *
When:
at 11:00 a.m. local time |
| Where: TETRA Technologies, Inc. Corporate Headquarters 24955 Interstate 45 North The Woodlands, Texas 77380 |
The purpose ofAt the annual meeting, isyou will be asked to consider and take action on the following:
| 1. | Election of seven directors to serve on the Board for one-year terms ending at the |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of |
| 3. | Advisory vote |
| 4. |
|
|
|
Additionally, if needed, the stockholders may act upon any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 5, 201828, 2022 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Your vote is important! Please promptly vote your shares by telephone, the internet, or, if the proxy statement was mailed to you, by marking, signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible, regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted. |
|
|
|
Kimberly M. O'Brien Corporate Secretary |
March 22, 2018April 11, 2022
The Woodlands, Texas
*
We intend to hold our annual meeting in person. However, due to the uncertainties surrounding the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19), it may not be possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting in person and we are planning for the possibility that the annual meeting may be delayed or held by means of remote communication. If we decide to take either such step, we will announce the decision to do so in advance of the annual meeting. If we elect to hold our annual meeting by remote communication, details on how to participate will be issued by press release, posted on our website at http://ir.tetratec.com/events-and-webcasts and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as additional proxy material.
Table of Contents
1 |
| 45 | ||
|
|
| 45 | |
2 |
| 46 | ||
2 |
|
|
| |
3 |
| 47 | ||
|
|
| 49 | |
|
| 49 | ||
8 |
| 50 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52 | ||
10 |
| 52 | ||
|
|
|
| |
|
| 53 | ||
12 |
| 54 | ||
12 |
| 54 | ||
|
| 55 | ||
13 |
|
| ||
14 |
| 56 | ||
15 |
| 59 | ||
19 |
| 66 | ||
22 |
| 67 | ||
|
|
| 67 | |
|
| 67 | ||
23 |
| 68 | ||
23 |
| 68 | ||
|
| 68 | ||
24 |
| 68 | ||
24 |
|
| ||
24 |
| 69 | ||
27 |
| 69 | ||
28 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 70 | |
30 |
|
|
| |
30 |
| 71 | ||
30 |
| 72 | ||
30 |
| 73 | ||
31 |
| 74 | ||
32 |
| 75 | ||
32 |
|
| ||
33 |
| 75 | ||
34 |
|
|
| |
34 |
| 78 | ||
35 |
|
|
| |
36 |
| 79 | ||
40 |
|
|
| |
40 |
|
| ||
41 |
| 81 | ||
41 |
|
| ||
42 |
| 83 | ||
43 |
| 83 | ||
43 |
| 84 | ||
43 |
| 84 | ||
|
|
|
| |
44 |
| 85 | ||
44 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| A-1 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| B-1 |
1 |
| 40 | ||
|
|
| 40 | |
5 |
|
| ||
5 |
| 41 | ||
5 |
| 41 | ||
5 |
| 41 | ||
6 |
| 43 | ||
|
|
| 43 | |
|
| 45 | ||
12 |
| 47 | ||
12 |
| 55 | ||
12 |
| 56 | ||
12 |
| 56 | ||
12 |
| 56 | ||
13 |
| 56 | ||
|
|
| 57 | |
|
| 57 | ||
14 |
| 57 | ||
15 |
|
| ||
15 |
| 57 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
| 58 | ||
16 |
|
|
| |
16 |
| 59 | ||
16 |
| 59 | ||
17 |
| 60 | ||
|
|
| 61 | |
18 |
| 62 | ||
18 |
| 62 | ||
18 |
|
| ||
18 |
| 63 | ||
|
| 65 | ||
19 |
|
|
| |
|
| 67 | ||
20 |
|
|
| |
20 |
| 68 | ||
23 |
|
|
| |
24 |
|
| ||
24 |
| 70 | ||
25 |
| 71 | ||
28 |
| 71 | ||
|
| 71 | ||
28 |
|
|
| |
29 |
| 72 | ||
30 |
| 72 | ||
30 |
| 72 | ||
31 |
| 73 | ||
31 |
| 75 | ||
31 |
|
|
| |
32 |
|
| ||
32 |
| 77 | ||
32 |
|
|
| |
32 |
|
|
| |
33 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
| |
37 |
|
|
| |
37 |
|
|
| |
38 |
|
|
|
Proxy Statement Summary
These highlights summarize certainThis summary provides an overview of selected information contained elsewhere in the proxy statementProxy Statement and does not contain all the information you should consider. You should refer to the remainder of the proxy statementProxy Statement for more information about us and the proposals you are being asked to consider.
2017 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
Throughout 2017, we focusedAnnual Meeting of Stockholders
Date & Time Tuesday, May 24, 2022 11:00 a.m. local time | Location 24955 Interstate 45 North The Woodlands, TX 77380 | Record Date Monday, March 28, 2022 |
Voting Matters
Stockholders will be asked to vote on positioning ourselves as critical support forthe following matters at the Annual Meeting:
| Board Recommendation | Page Reference | |
Management Proposals |
|
| |
1 - | Election of Directors | Vote FOR each director nominee | 5 |
2 - | Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm | Vote FOR | 12 |
3 - | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation | Vote FOR | 14 |
|
|
| |
Stockholder Proposal |
|
| |
4 - | To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding simple majority vote, if properly presented | No Recommendation | 16 |
Snapshot of 2022 Director Nominees
Our director nominees exhibit an effective mix of diversity, experience and perspective. The following chart summarizes the independence, tenure and diversity of our customers. While staying on track with our long-term growth strategies, our near-term focus in 2017 was on strategically balancing our continued lean cost and operations management and increasing resources to meet our customers’ needs in a growth environment.director nominees.
| Tenure | Diversity |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
William D. Sullivan, the current Chairman of our Board of Directors, will retire from the board upon the expiration of his term at the upcoming Annual Meeting. Our board determined that John F. Glick, currently the Chairman of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee, would succeed Mr. Sullivan as Chairman of our Board of Directors and Gina A. Luna would succeed Mr. Glick as Chairman of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee immediately following the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 1 |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
| Tenure (years) |
| Independent | Committee Memberships |
| Public Directorships | |||||
Audit | HCMCC | NGSC | |||||||||
Mark E. Baldwin |
| 8 |
| ✓ | C |
|
|
| 3 | ||
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
| 10 |
| ✓ |
| C |
|
| 3 | ||
John F. Glick |
| 8 |
| ✓ |
| • | C |
| 2 | ||
Gina A. Luna |
| 3 |
| ✓ | • |
| • |
| 2 | ||
Brady M. Murphy |
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | ||
Sharon B. McGee |
| <1 |
| ✓ |
| • | • |
| 1 | ||
Shawn D. Williams |
| 1 |
| ✓ | • | • |
|
| 2 | ||
HCMCC = Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee | C = Chair | ||||||||||
NGSC = Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee | ● = Member |
Corporate Governance Highlights
We continuously monitor developments and best practices in corporate governance and enhance our practices as warranted and based on stockholder feedback. Our practices include policies and structures that we believe are sound and effective corporate governance practices, including:
Majority vote policy in the election of directors | |
● | Annual election of all directors |
● | Separation of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions |
● | Regular meetings of our non-employee independent directors |
● | Thoughtful Board Evaluation Process |
2 | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Proxy Statement Summary
● | Director and Executive Succession Planning |
● | Formal Onboarding Program for New Directors |
● | Rigorous stock ownership guidelines applicable to directors and executive officers |
● | A prohibition against directors, executive officers and employees holding our securities in margin accounts or pledging our securities, absent company approval |
● | A prohibition against directors, executive officers and employees engaging in certain hedging transactions with respect to our securities |
● | Executive Officer change in control benefits that are subject to “double trigger” |
● | An independent compensation consultant hired by and reporting to the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee |
● | Compensation clawback policy that provides us with a mechanism to recover incentive compensation paid to our executive officers in certain circumstances |
● | Human Rights Standards |
Executive Compensation Highlights
Below is a list of our 2021 Named Executive Officers, or “NEOs,” and select 2021 compensation highlights. Our executive compensation program reflects a fundamental belief that compensation should be competitive with the broad market in which we compete for executive talent, and commensurate with the performance of the individual executives and the Company. During 2021, we increased the portion of total target direct compensation that is performance-based for our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Murphy, and our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Serrano, further strengthening the alignment of their compensation with the long-term interests of our stockholders. For additional information on the 2021 compensation of our NEOs, please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), beginning on page 40.
| Change in Annual Base Salary (2020 to 2021) |
| Change in Target Annual Bonus (2020 to 2021) |
| Percentage of 2021 Total Target Direct Compensation that is Variable or Performance-Based | ||
Brady M. Murphy President & CEO |
| -10% |
| +25% |
| 84% | |
Elijio V. Serrano Sr. VP & CFO |
| -10% |
| +25% |
| 78% | |
Matthew J. Sanderson Sr. VP |
| No change |
| No change |
| 68% | |
Timothy C. Moeller Sr. VP |
| +15% |
| +17% |
| 64% | |
Jacek M. Mucha VP Finance & Treasurer |
| No change |
| No change |
| 58% |
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 3 |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
4 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Proxy Statement Summary
Business Highlights
● | Strong revenue growth and growing demand for our Completion Fluids & Products despite double-digit inflation across most of our raw materials, energy prices for our plants, and global supply chain disruptions |
● | Market share gains in our Water & Flowback Services business segment due to our differentiating technologies, digitizing operations, and integrated water management solution |
● | Completed the divestiture of our interests and related assets in CSI Compressco LP for $30.7 million, significantly simplifying our business model |
● | Continued progress on our low carbon initiatives to leverage our chemistry expertise and resources around carbon capture and energy storage, further demonstrating our commitment to ESG initiatives |
● | Strong culture of QHS&E drives product and service delivery |
● | Refocused business model, making the Company more resilient with a leaner and asset light structure and a more focused portfolio of products and services |
● | Uniquely positioned for the resurgence in oil and gas activity and the opportunities to participate in a meaningful way in the coming years in the exciting energy-transition market |
Financial Results – Delivered on our Commitments to Stockholders
In 2021, TETRA drove improvements in key financial metrics by:
● | Increasing revenue by 3% to $388 million |
● | Improving adjusted EBITDA* to $50 million |
● | Continuing to achieve positive free cash flow* of $9.3 million |
● | Significantly reducing net debt* outstanding by $12 million to $120 million |
● | Outperforming our industry peers, delivering indexed total stockholder returns (TSR) nearly triple the Oilfield Service Index (OSX) |
* | adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, and net debt are not presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Please see Appendix A – Information Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures - for reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures |
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 5 |
PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSALS |
Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors
The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each nominee |
RetirementBoard Leadership Transition
William D. Sullivan, the current Chairman of Current Board Members
Stephen A. Snider and Kenneth E. White, Jr., both current members of theour Board of Directors, will retire from the board upon the expiration of their respective termshis term at the upcoming Annual Meeting, and therefore, havehas not been nominated for reelection. ImmediatelyMr. Williams was appointed to the Board of Directors in 2021 consistent with a Cooperation Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2021, by and among the Company, Bradley L. Radoff and The Radoff Family Foundation.
Our board determined that John F. Glick, currently the Chairman of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee, would succeed Mr. Sullivan as Chairman of our Board of Directors and Gina A. Luna would succeed Mr. Glick as Chairman of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee immediately following the Annual Meeting. Also, immediately following the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors expects to set the size of the board at seven directors. Proxies solicited hereby cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the nominees for director set forth below.
Our Board of Directors believes that each director nominee for election at the Annual Meeting is highly qualified. The director nominees’ biographies (below) describe the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that have been considered by the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee and contributed to such individuals’ being nominated for our Board of Directors. As their biographies indicate, all the director nominees possess significant leadership and professional experience, knowledge, including energy industry knowledge, and skills that qualify them for service on our board. Each director, other than Mr. Brightman,Murphy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, satisfies the independence requirements under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). All directors satisfy the criteria stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and possess the personal characteristics essential for the proper and effective functioning of our board.
The terms of office of each of the nineeight current directors will expire at the time of the Annual Meeting. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee of the Board of Directors has recommended, and the Board of Directors has nominated and urges you to vote “FOR”, the election of the seven persons listed below who have been nominated to serve one-year terms as directors. Each of the nominees has consented to be named in this proxy statementProxy Statement and to serve as a director, if elected.
A plurality vote is required for the election of directors in Proposal No. 1, subject to our majority voting policy discussed below.1. This means that, if a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, the seven nominees receiving the greatest numbers of “FOR” votes will be elected to serve as directors. Please see the "General Information About the Meeting and Voting" section in this proxy statementProxy Statement for additional information.
It is intended that the proxies solicited hereby will be voted “FOR” the election of such nominees, unless the authority to do so has been withheld by you. If, at the time of the Annual Meeting, any of the nominees should be unable or decline to serve, the discretionary authority provided in the proxy will enable the proxy holder to vote for a substitute nominee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any substitute nominee will be required.
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1 —– ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Majority Vote Policy:Policy: Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in an uncontested election (that is, an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of votes WITHHELD for his or her election than votes FOR such election shall, following certification of the stockholder vote, unless such nominee has previously submitted an irrevocable resignation in accordance with the majority vote policy, promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee is required to recommend to the Board of Directors whether such tendered resignation should be accepted or rejected. The Board of Directors will then determine whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. Following the Board of Director’s decision on the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee’s recommendation, we will promptly disclose the Board of Director’s decision and decisiondecision- making process regarding a tendered resignation in a document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Each of the director nominees has previously submitted an irrevocable resignation letter. Please read our Corporate Governance Guidelines posted in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations area of our website at www.tetratec.com for more information regarding our majority vote policy.
The nominees for election as directors are as follows:
Name |
| Age |
| Position with Us |
| Director Since |
| Public Directorships (including TETRA and CCLP) |
|
| Age |
| Position with Us |
| Tenure (years) |
| Public Directorships |
| ||
Mark E. Baldwin |
| 64 |
| Director |
| 2014 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 68 |
| Independent Director |
| 8 |
|
| 3 |
|
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
| 68 |
| Director |
| 2011 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 72 |
| Independent Director |
| 10 |
|
| 3 |
|
Stuart M. Brightman |
| 61 |
| Director, CEO |
| 2009 |
|
| 3 |
| ||||||||||
Paul D. Coombs |
| 62 |
| Director |
| 1994 |
|
| 3 |
| ||||||||||
John F. Glick |
| 65 |
| Director |
| 2014 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 69 |
| Independent Director |
| 8 |
|
| 2 |
|
William D. Sullivan |
| 61 |
| Director |
| 2007 |
|
| 4 |
| ||||||||||
Joseph C. Winkler III |
| 66 |
| Director |
| 2015 |
|
| 4 |
| ||||||||||
Gina A. Luna |
| 48 |
| Independent Director |
| 3 |
|
| 2 |
| ||||||||||
Sharon B. McGee |
| 57 |
| Independent Director |
| ˂1 |
|
| 1 |
| ||||||||||
Brady M. Murphy |
| 62 |
| Director, President and CEO |
| 3 |
|
| 1 |
| ||||||||||
Shawn D. Williams |
| 59 |
| Independent Director |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
See “Beneficial Stock Ownership of Certain Stockholders and Management” on page 6269 for information regarding the number of shares of our common stock owned by each nominee.
Mark E. Baldwin | ||
| ||
• Age • Independent Director since 2014 Board Committees • Audit Committee (Chairman) | ||
Key Attributes/Skills/Expertise. Mr. Baldwin, through his experience in executive financial positions with public companies, brings significant knowledge of accounting, capital structures, finance and financial reporting, risk management, strategic planning, and forecasting and provides the board and audit committee important perspective on our financial reporting and governance obligations. Mr. Baldwin has extensive knowledge of the energy industry and his financial management and operations experience provides a significant contribution to our Board of Director’s mix of backgrounds and skills. |
Mr. Baldwin has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2014 and as Chairman of our Audit Committee since May 2014. Mr. Baldwin served as the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Dresser-Rand Group, Inc., a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the "Exchange Act")(a "Public Company "), from August 2007 until his retirement in May 2013. Prior to joining Dresser-Rand, he served as the executive vice president, chief financial officer, and treasurer of Veritas DGC Inc., a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act,Public Company, from August 2004 through February 2007, and operating partner at First Reserve Corporation from April 2003 through July 2004. Mr. Baldwin served as executive vice president and chief financial officer for NextiraOne from October 2001 through August 2002, and as chairman of the board and chief executive officer for Pentacon Inc. from 1997 through 2001. From
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
1980 through 1997, Mr. Baldwin served in a variety of finance and operations positions with Keystone International Inc., including treasurer, chief financial officer, and president of the Industrial Valves
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 7 |
PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
and Controls Group. Mr. Baldwin currently serves as a director and as chairmana member of the audit committee of KBR, Inc. and as a director chairman of the audit committee, and as a member of the nominating, governance and compensationaudit committee of Nine Energy Service, Inc., both of which are public companies subject to the requirements of the Exchange Act.Public Companies. He previously served as a director of Seahawk Drilling Inc. from August 2009 until February 2011. Mr. Baldwin has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University and an MBA from Tulane University.
Thomas R. Bates, Jr., Ph.D. | ||
| ||
• Age • Independent Director since 2011 Board Committees • Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee (Chairman) | ||
Key Attributes/Skills/Expertise. Dr. Bates has over 40 years of experience in the international oil and gas services industry, both in management positions with operational responsibilities and as a director. Through his leadership roles, Dr. Bates has gained significant management development, executive compensation, and succession planning experience. Dr. Bates’ experience serving as a director of other public companies provides cross-board experience and perspective, and his past management of a private equity firm provides valuable entrepreneurial and capital markets insight. |
Dr. Bates has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November 2011, as Chairman of our Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee since May 2014, and as a member of that committee since May 2012. Dr. Bates is a private investor and currently an adjunct professor in the Finance Department at Texas Christian University where he teaches in the MBA program at the Neeley School of Business.Business and serves on the board of the Ralph Lowe Energy Institute. Dr. Bates joined Lime Rock Management LP, an energy-focused private equity firm, as a managing director in 2001 and became a senior advisor of the firm in 2010 before retiring in 2013. Dr. Bates had 25 years of experience in oil service management and operations before joining Lime Rock. He served from 1998 through 2000 as president of the Discovery Group of Baker Hughes and was responsible for the integration of Western Atlas into Baker Hughes. Earlier, he served as president and chief executive officer of Weatherford Enterra. Previously, Dr. Bates spent 15 years with Schlumberger in both domestic and international locations and was responsible for the Anadrill business unit when early MWD and LWD tools were commercialized. Dr. Bates began his career with Shell Oil Company, where he conducted drilling research. Dr. Bates has been a personal investor and/or a corporate investor in more than a dozen oil service technology startups. Dr. Bates serves as chairman of the board of directors and a member of the compensation and audit committees of Independence Contract Drilling, Inc. and as chairman of the board of directors and a member of the compensation and nominating and governance committees of Tidewater Inc., both of which are public companies subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Dr. Bates also serves on the board of directors and as chairman of the compensation and leadership development committee and member of the audit committee of Alacer Gold Corporation,SSR Mining, Inc., a Canadian publicly traded company, and as chairman of the board of directors and a member of the audit committee of Vantage Drilling International, a privatepublic company providing drilling services.that trades on the OTC. Dr. Bates previously served on the boards of Hercules Offshore,Independence Contract Drilling, Inc. from 2004August, 2014 through November 2015, Natco Group,June, 2020, Weatherford International, plc from December 2019 until June 2020, and Tidewater Inc. from 2003 through 2009, and T-3 Energy Services from 2007 until it was acquired in 2011.July 2017 to October 2019. Dr. Bates is a graduate of the University of Michigan with a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering.
|
|
|
8 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. |
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
| ||
|
|
Mr. Brightman has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a director since May 2009. From May 2009 until February 2018, he also served as our President. He served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from April 2005 through May 2009. Mr. Brightman also serves as chairman of the board of directors of our CSI Compressco GP Inc. subsidiary, the general partner of CSI Compressco LP ("CSI Compressco" or “CCLP”), one of our consolidated subsidiaries and a publicly traded limited partnership subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. From April 2004 to April 2005, Mr. Brightman was self-employed. Mr. Brightman served as president of the Dresser Flow Control division of Dresser, Inc. from April 2002 until April 2004. From November 1998 to April 2002, Mr. Brightman was president of the Americas Operation of the Dresser Valve Division of Dresser, Inc. He served in other capacities during the earlier portion of his career with Dresser, from 1993 to 1998. From 1982 to 1993, Mr. Brightman served in several financial and operational positions with Cameron Iron Works and its successor, Cooper Oil Tools. Mr. Brightman also serves on the board of directors and as a member of the compensation and nominating and governance committees of C&J Energy Services, Inc., a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Mr. Brightman received his B.S. degree from the University of Pennsylvania and his Master of Business Administration degree from the Wharton School of Business.
| ||
|
|
Mr. Coombs has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June 1994. He has served as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since July 2012 and as a member of our Audit Committee since May 2015. Mr. Coombs currently serves as a director of our CSI Compressco GP Inc. subsidiary, the general partner of CSI Compressco, also one of our consolidated subsidiaries and a publicly traded limited partnership subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. From April 2005 until his retirement in June 2007, Mr. Coombs served as our Executive Vice President of Strategic Initiatives, and from May 2001 to April 2005, as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. From January 1994 to May 2001, Mr. Coombs served as our Executive Vice President - Oil & Gas, from 1987 to 1994 he served as Senior Vice President - Oil & Gas, and from 1985 to 1987, as General Manager - Oil & Gas. He has served in numerous other positions with us since 1982. Mr. Coombs is presently a director and serves on the audit and corporate governance committees of the board of directors of Balchem Corporation, a public company that is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1 —– ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
| ||
• Age • Independent Director since 2014 Board Committees • Nominating, Governance and • Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee | ||
Key Attributes/Skills/ Mr. Glick brings extensive energy industry, management, and oversight experience, having served in executive management positions with various public energy services and manufacturing companies. Mr. Glick’s broad experience in manufacturing and servicing a variety of oilfield drilling and completion products, both domestically and internationally, provides valuable insight to our Board of Directors from an operational and strategic planning perspective. |
Mr. Glick has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2014, as Chairman of our Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee since May 2015 and has been a member of that committee and our Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee since May 2014. Mr. Glick served as the chief executive officer and a director of Lufkin Industries, Inc., a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act,Public Company, from March 2008 until his retirement in July 2013 and served as Lufkin’s president and a director since August 2007. During his tenure, Mr. Glick oversaw the growth of Lufkin and, ultimately, the sale of the company to General Electric in July 2013. From September 1994 through August 2007, Mr. Glick served as the vice president and general manager of Lufkin’s Power Transmission Division. He served as vice president and general manager of Lufkin’s Oilfield Division from August 2007 through August 2008. Prior to joining Lufkin, from 1974 through 1994, Mr. Glick held several senior management level positions with Cameron Iron Works, Inc. Mr. Glick currently serves as the non-executive chairman of the board of directors, chairman of the nominating and as agovernance committee, and an ex-officio member of the audit nomination/governance, and remuneration committees of Hunting PLC, an FTSE 350a public company traded on the London Stock Exchange. Mr. GlickExchange and also serves as the vice chairman of the board of directorsTreasurer of CHI St. Luke's Health and sits on its executive committee, and is a directorcommittee. Mr. Glick previously served on the board of CHI St. Luke's Memorial Health.Weatherford International plc from December 2019 until June 2020. Mr. Glick received a B.S. in Journalism from the University of Kansas and graduated from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Program for Management Development.
Mr. SullivanMs. Luna has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2007July 2018 and as Chairman since May 2015. He previouslycurrently serves on our Audit Committee and our Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee. Ms. Luna has served as Chairmana managing partner of our NominatingGP Capital Partners since November 2020 and Corporate Governance Committeeserved as the chief executive officer of Luna Strategies, LLC, an independent consulting firm, from November 2016 to September 2021. Prior to that, Ms. Luna served at JPMorgan Chase and as a member of our Compensation Committee. From 1981 through August 2003, Mr. Sullivan was employed in various capacities by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,Co. for 21 years, holding several senior management level positions, most recently as executive vice president, explorationmanaging director, Chase Commercial Banking, from 2009 to November 2016, as chief marketing officer, Chase
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 9 |
PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Commercial Banking, from 2005 to 2009, and production. Mr. Sullivanas chief operating officer, Commercial and Investment Banking, South Region, from 2000 to 2005. Ms. Luna has been retired since August 2005. Mr. Sullivan servesalso served on the board of directors and as a director and a member of the audit committee of Roku, Inc., a Public Company, since December 7, 2020. Ms. Luna received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, with majors in finance and management, from Texas A&M University and earned an NACD Directorship Certification through the NACD Directorship Certification program. NACD Directorship Certified directors establish themselves as committed to continuing education on emerging issues and to helping to elevate the profession of directorship.
Brady M. Murphy | ||
• Age 62 • President and Chief Executive Officer • Director Since 2018 (not Independent) Board Committees • No Committee Memberships | ||
Key Attributes/Skills/Expertise. Mr. Murphy has more than 35 years of global operations, engineering, manufacturing and business development experience in a variety of areas within the energy industry, including deepwater, mature fields and unconventional assets. Mr. Murphy’s service as our President and Chief Executive Officer and his prior service as our Chief Operating Officer provides our Board of Directors with an in-depth source of knowledge regarding our operations, customers, competitors, markets in which we operate, business strategy, safety leadership, executive management team, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs. |
Mr. Murphy has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2019, as our President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2018 until his promotion to Chief Executive Officer in May 2019, and as a director since December 2018. From May 2019 to January 2021, Mr. Murphy also served as President and chairman of the board of directors of CSI Compressco GP Inc. subsidiary,LLC, the general partner of CSI Compressco alsoLP, formerly one of our consolidated subsidiaries and a publicly traded limited partnership subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.partnership. Mr. Sullivan is the non-executive chairman of the board of directors of SM Energy Company, a publicly traded exploration and production company that is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Mr. Sullivan is also a director and serves on the audit, nominating and corporate governance and conflicts, and compensation committees of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, the general partner of Legacy Reserves, LP, a publicly traded limited partnership holding oil and gas producing assets, primarily in the Permian Basin and Rocky Mountain areas. From February 2007 to May 2015, Mr. SullivanMurphy served as a director of CSI Compressco GP LLC from February 2018 to January 2021. Prior to joining TETRA, Mr. Murphy served as chief executive officer of Paradigm Group B.V., a private company focused on strategic technologies for the upstream energy industry, from January 2016 until February 2018. Mr. Murphy previously served at Halliburton Company and its affiliated companies for 26 years and held numerous international and North America positions, most recently as senior vice president - global business development and marketing from 2012 to December 2015, as senior vice president - business development Eastern Hemisphere from 2011 to 2012, and as a member of the conflicts and audit committees of Targa Resources Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Targa Resources Partners LP, a publicly traded limited partnership.senior vice president - Europe/Sub–Saharan Africa region from 2008 to 2011. Earlier in his career, from 1981 until 1989, Mr. SullivanMurphy held several positions with increasing responsibility at Gerhart Industries. Mr. Murphy received his B.S. degree in MechanicalChemical Engineering from Texas A&M University.Pennsylvania State University and is an alumnus of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.
|
|
|
10 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. |
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1 —– ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
| ||
• Age • Independent Director since Board Committees • Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee • Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee | ||
Key Attributes/Skills/Qualifications. Ms. McGee is an accomplished global specialty chemicals executive with a broad range of experience from global business management to responsibilities over corporate development, sales and marketing, supply chain and logistics, manufacturing operations, R&D and innovation, investor relations, sustainability and governance. Her expertise provides valuable insight to our Board of Directors regarding our aqueous chemistry solutions and low carbon energy initiatives. |
Ms. McGee has served as a member of our Board of Directors and as a member of our Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee and our Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee since February 2022. Ms. McGee founded SDBM Executive and Strategic Advisory, LLC (“SDBM”) in May, 2021, an independent advisory service to the new energy, chemicals, materials, mining, and oil and gas industries. Through SDBM, and prior to her appointment, Ms. McGee served as a consultant to the Company from August 11, 2021 to December 31, 2021. Prior to that, Ms. McGee served at Albemarle Corporation for 33 years, holding several senior management level positions, most recently as Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Development from 2016 through January, 2021, Vice President, Asia Pacific Region and Global Fire Safety Sales from 2014-2016, Vice President, Sales – Americas from 2013-2014, Division Vice President, Performance Chemicals from 2008-2013, and Global Business Director, Industrial Bromides from 2005-2008. Albemarle is one of the largest global producers of lithium and lithium derivatives, and bromine and bromine derivatives, of which Ms. McGee participated in many of those strategic discussions. Ms. McGee earned an Executive MBA Certificate from Louisiana State University and MS and BS degrees in Chemical Engineering from the University of Arkansas.
Shawn D. Williams | ||
• Age 59 • Independent Director since 2021 Board Committees • Audit • Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee | ||
Key Attributes/Skills/ Mr. |
Mr. WinklerWilliams has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2015March 2021 and currently serves on our Audit Committee. Mr. Winkler served as chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Complete Production Services Inc. from March 2007 until February 2012, at which time he retired in connection with the acquisition of Complete by Superior Energy Services, Inc. From June 2005 to March 2007, Mr. Winkler served as Complete Production Services Inc.'s president and chief executive officer. Prior to that, from March 2005 to June 2005, Mr. Winkler served as the executive vice president and chief operating officer of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and from May 2003 until March 2005, as the president and chief operating officer of such company’s predecessor, Varco International, Inc. From April 1996 until May 2003, Mr. Winkler served in various other senior management capacities with Varco and its predecessor. From 1993 to April 1996, Mr. Winkler served as the chief financial officer of D.O.S., Ltd., a privately held company that was acquired by Varco International in April 1996. Prior to joining D.O.S., Ltd., Mr. Winkler served as chief financial officer of Baker Hughes INTEQ, and served in a similar role for various companies owned by Baker Hughes Incorporated. Mr. Winkler has served as a director of the general partner of Hi-Crush Partners LP since 2012 and currently serves as chairman of its audit committee and a member of its conflicts committee, as a director of Commercial Metals Company since 2012 and currently serves as a member of its compensation committeeour Audit Committee and Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee since April 2021. Most recently, Mr. Williams served as chairmanthe Chief Executive Officer of its finance committee,Nexeo Plastics Holdings, Inc., a global plastics distributor, from April 2019 until June of 2020 and from September 2012 to March of 2019 as a directorExecutive Vice President of Eclipse Resources CorporationNexeo Solutions, Inc. Mr. Williams has been retired since 2014 and currently serves as a member of its audit and compensation committees, all of which are publicly traded companies subjectJune 2020. Prior to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Mr. Winkler also served on the board of Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.joining Nexeo Solutions, from 2007 until its merger with Siemens AGto 2012 Mr. Williams served as President of Momentive Global Sealants, a global specialty sealants business, and President of Momentive Performance Materials, a silicone specialty materials business. Earlier in July 2015.his career, Mr. Winkler received a B.S. degreeWilliams spent 22 years serving in Accounting from Louisiana State University.
industrial and material business leadership roles at General Electric Company
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 11 |
PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
and led businesses globally in the Americas, Europe, and Asia across a broad sector of markets. Since January 1, 2022, Mr. Williams has served as the executive chairman of the board of managers of Covia Holdings, LLC, a provider of minerals-based solutions serving the industrial and energy markets, has served as a member of its audit committee and compensation committee since December 2020, and served as chairman of the board of managers from December 2020 to December 2021. Mr. Williams has also served on the board of directors of Kirby Corporation, a Public Company, since July 2021. Mr. Williams earned his M.B.A. from the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, and a B.S. in electrical engineering from Purdue University.
12 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL NO. 2 – Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Proposal No. 2 — Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board recommends a vote FOR this Proposal |
Proposal No. 2 requests stockholder approval of the Board of Directors’Audit Committee’s selection of the firm of Ernst & YoungGrant Thornton LLP (“E&Y”GT”) as our independent registered public accounting firm, or “independent auditors”, for the year ending December 31, 2018.2022.
Independence of our Independent Auditor
The Audit Committee evaluates the selection of the independent auditors each year and has selected E&YGT for the current year. E&YGT has served as our independent auditors since 1981.June 2020. The Audit Committee concluded that many factors contribute to the continued support of E&Y’sGT’s independence, such as the oversight of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) through the establishment of audit, quality, ethics, and independence standards, in addition to conducting audit inspections, the mandating of reports on internal control over financial reporting, PCAOB requirements for audit partner rotation, and limitations imposed by regulation and by our Audit Committee on non-audit services provided by E&Y.GT. The Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services to be performed by E&YGT as well as reviews and approves the fees charged by E&YGT for such services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services performed by GT during the last two fiscal years. In its review and pre-approval of non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors, the possible impact of the performance of such services on the auditors’ independence. In addition, under the auditor independence rules, E&YGT reviews its independence each year and delivers to the Audit Committee a letter addressing matters prescribed in those rules. Please see the Audit Committee Report on page 4735 for additional information regarding the Audit Committee’s evaluation of E&Y.GT.
In accordance with applicableSEC rules, onaudit partners for independent registered public accounting firms are also subject to rotation requirements that limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may serve in certain roles. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum is five consecutive years of service. We select the lead partner from our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to this rotation E&Y’s coordinating partner for our audit was changed in 2013,policy following meetings with potential candidates and discussions between the coordinating partner on our account since that time rotated off our account at the completion of the 2017 audit, while E&Y’s engagement quality review partner for our audit was most recently changed in 2014 and will rotate off our account after the 2018 audit. The Audit Committee was involved in the selection of the new coordinating partner who is on our account commencing with the 2018 audit.and management.
Considerations Regarding Appointment
The Audit Committee considers, among other factors, the fact that we require global, standardized, and well-coordinated services, not only for audit purposes, but for other non-audit service items, including statutory audits and various regulatory certification items. ManySome of these services are provided to us by multinational audit and accounting firms other than E&Y.GT. A change in our independent auditor may require us to replace one or more of these other multinational service providers and could significantly disrupt our business due to a loss of cumulative knowledge in such service providers’ areas of expertise.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 2 — RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board RecommendationRecommendation
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” ratification and approval of the appointment of E&YGT as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20182022 fiscal year, and proxies returned will be so voted unless contrary instructions are indicated thereon.
As a matter of good corporate governance, the Board of Directors submits the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm to our stockholders for ratification. If our stockholders do not ratify the
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 13 |
PROPOSAL NO. 2 – Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection of the firm as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018,2022, but the Audit Committee may also elect to retain the firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the committee determines that such change would be appropriate. Representatives of E&YGT are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Approval of Proposal No. 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the common shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting of stockholders.2022 Annual Meeting. Please see the "General Information About the Meeting and Voting" section in this proxy statementProxy Statement for additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 3 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
Proposal No. 3 — Advisory Vote toto Approve Executive Compensation
The Board recommends a vote FOR this Proposal |
In Proposal No. 3, we are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”(collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, as disclosed in this proxy statementProxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules. While this vote is not binding on our Company, the results of the votes on this proposal will be carefully considered by the Board of Directors and the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee (“HCMCC”) of our Board of Directors when making future executive compensation decisions. The next such vote will occur at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this |
The following are some of the key topics discussed in greater detail in the CD&A and in other sections of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, and stockholders are encouraged to read these other sections.
Every member of our Compensation CommitteeHCMCC is independent, as independence is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE (page 37)26).
Our Executive Incentive Compensation CommitteeRecoupment Policy provides a mechanism for us to recover all forms of incentive compensation paid to our executive officers in some circumstances (page 56).
Our HCMCC has established a thorough process for the review and approval of our compensation programs and practices and it has retained and directed an independent compensation consultant to assist in the discharge of its duties (page 57)46).
Our Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines that apply to our directors and executive officers (pages 3524 and 68)57).
We employ our executive officers “at will” under employment agreements similar to those executed by all our employees (page 68)56).
Our insider trading policy prohibits transactions involving short sales, the buying and selling of puts, calls, or other derivative instruments, and certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions involving our securities (page 44)32).
Our Cash Incentive Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, and Third Amended and Restated 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan each includes a clawback provision that provides us with a mechanism to recover amounts awarded under such plans in certain circumstances (page 44).
On an annual basis, our Compensation CommitteeHCMCC awards performance-based, long-term cash incentives to certain of our executive officers to supplement the long-term performance-based incentive and retention value provided by time-vesting equity awards.
A significant portion of our executive officers’ compensation is in the form of long-term incentive awards that are tied to the long-term performance of our stock and certain key measures that drive stockholder returns. The process by which the HCMCC determines the structure of these long-term incentive awards takes into account TETRA’s performance relative to our peers and internal budgeted expectations, market compensation and the need to retain executive talent over the long-term, and alignment with the experience of our long-term stockholders.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 3 — ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We believe that providing both short- and long-term incentive compensation awards also helps reduce risks to us or our stockholders that could arise from excessive focus on short-term performance (page 78)67).
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 15 |
PROPOSAL NO. 3 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
Our Board of Directors believes that our compensation program is effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and furthering our strategic goals and objectives. Pursuant to SEC rules, we are asking our stockholders to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”)NEOs as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A (beginning on page 52)40), the compensation tables (beginning on page 71)59) and the narrative discussion following the compensation tables. This advisory stockholder vote, commonly known as “say-on-pay,” gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to approve or not approve our executive compensation program and policies through the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of TETRA Technologies, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of its named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s 20182022 Proxy Statement pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.”
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the named executive officer compensation as disclosed pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion as contained in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. Proxies returned will be so voted unless contrary instructions are indicated thereon.
Approval of Proposal No. 3, on an advisory basis, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the common shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting of stockholders. Please see the "General Information About the Meeting and Voting" section in this proxy statementProxy Statement for additional information.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
Proposal No. 4 — Approval of 2018 Equity Incentive Plan
|
Our stockholders are being asked to approve our 2018 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, which is referred to in this description as the 2018 Plan. The 2018 Plan includes a number of features that our Board of Directors believes are consistent with the interests of our stockholders and sound corporate governance practices, and will provide us with a share reserve that will enable us to continue to provide a competitive mix of compensation to our key employees.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the 2018 Plan, and proxies returned will be so voted unless contrary instructions are indicated thereon.
On March 15, 2018, our Board of Directors, at the recommendation of our Compensation Committee (“Committee”), approved the TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (“the 2018 Plan”), subject to approval by our stockholders at our 2018 annual meeting. The number of shares of our common stock that may be the subject of awards and issued under the 2018 Plan is 6,365,000. The 2018 Plan will become effective on the date it is approved by our stockholders. In addition, this year we have elected to bifurcate our equity incentive plans and have established, and are seeking stockholder approval of, a stand-alone equity plan for non-employee directors with a share reserve of an additional 335,000 shares (the “Director Plan”) (please see Proposal No. 5 below). If both the 2018 Plan and the Director Plan are approved by our stockholders, we intend to continue this practice going forward.
We also have grants outstanding under our 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Existing Plan”) and our 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”) which continue to be governed by the applicable terms and conditions of the respective plan. The 2007 Plan has expired and no further options or awards may be granted under such plan. We may also grant inducement equity awards to new employees under our 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan (the “Inducement Plan”), more fully described on page 23.
If the 2018 Plan is approved by our stockholders, no new awards will be made under the Existing Plan, unless the Director Plan is not approved by stockholders. If the Director Plan is not approved by stockholders, annual awards to our non-employee directors will continue to be made under the Existing Plan. Awards outstanding under the Existing Plan and the 2007 Plan as of the date the 2018 Plan becomes effective will continue to be subject to the terms of the applicable plan; however, if those awards subsequently expire, are forfeited, canceled or terminated or are settled in cash, the shares subject to those awards will not become available for awards under the 2018 Plan.
As of the close of business on March 5, 2018, the record date for the Annual Meeting, a total of 9,422,837 shares were subject to outstanding awards under the Existing Plan, of which 3,615,389 shares were subject to outstanding stock options with an average exercise price of $6.91 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.43 years, and 1,459,142 shares were subject to unvested restricted stock awards. As of the same date, 1,577,164 shares were available for future awards under the Existing Plan. No shares remaining available for future awards under the Existing Plan as of the effective date of the 2018 Plan will be carried over into the 2018 Plan.
|
|
|
16 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. |
|
PROPOSAL NO.Proposal No. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN– Shareholder Proposal
AsProposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal
Background of the close of business on March 5, 2018, a total of 2,309,666 shares were subject to outstanding awards under the 2007 Plan, of which 2,031,529 shares were subject to outstanding stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $10.23 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 3.608 years, and 278,137 shares were subject to unvested restricted stock awards. The 2007 Plan has expired and no further awards can be made under the 2007 Plan.
As of the close of business on March 5, 2018, a total of 923,505 shares were subject to outstanding awards under the Inducement Plan, all of which were subject to unvested restricted stock awards. As of the same date, 76,495 shares of restricted stock were available for future awards under the Inducement Plan. Proposal
Stockholder approvalIn accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a shareholder proposal and supporting statement from Kenneth Steiner of 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021-2100, who has indicated he is the 2018 Plan is being sought in order to satisfy the stockholder approval requirementsbeneficial owner of the New York Stock Exchange and Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) to enable options granted under the 2018 Plan to qualify as incentive stock options.
If the 2018 Plan is not approved by our stockholders, the Existing Plan will remain in effect, and we will remain subject to the existing share reserve of the Existing Plan.
Factors Considered in Setting Size of Requested Share Reserve
In setting the proposed number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors considered a number of factors, including the following:
Shares available for grant and outstanding awards
Under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” on page 45, we provide information about theat least 1,000 shares of our common stock since at least September 1, 2018 and intends for the following proposal to be presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting. In accordance with Rule 14a-8(h) of the Exchange Act, the shareholder proposal is required to be voted on at the 2022 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by the shareholder proponent or his qualified representative at the meeting. The text of the shareholder’s resolution and the statement that maythe shareholder furnished to us in support thereof appear below, exactly as submitted, and we are not responsible for inaccuracies or omissions therein.
Proposal 4 – Simple Majority Vote
RESOLVED, Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be issued undereliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the Existing Plan asvotes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of December 31, 2017, the endvotes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. This includes any existing supermajority vote requirement that result from default to state law and can be subject to elimination.
Shareholders are willing to pay a premium for shares of companies that have excellent corporate governance. Supermajority voting requirements have been found to be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively related to company performance according to “What Matters in Corporate Governance” by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements are used to block initiatives supported by most shareholders but opposed by a status quo management.
This proposal topic won from 74% to 88% support at Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hill and Macy’s. The proponents of these proposals included Ray T. Chevedden and William Steiner. The votes would have been higher than 74% to 88% if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.
Church & Dwight shareholders gave 99% support to a 2020 proposal on this same topic. This proposal topic also won 99%-support at the 2021 ConocoPhillips annual meeting.
There should be urgency in reforming our outdated corporate governance given that our stock was at $12 in 2014.
Please vote yes:
Simple Majority Vote – Proposal 4
The Board of Directors is not recommending a vote for or against Proposal No. 4. Rather, the Board of Directors is interested in the viewpoints of the Company’s stockholders and will evaluate the voting results on Proposal No. 4, together with additional stockholder input received in the course of our most recent fiscal year. To facilitateregular stockholder engagement program, in determining what actions it will take. Stockholders should note that this proposal is advisory in nature only and approval of this proposal would not, by itself, implement a majority voting standard as described in the 2018 Plan, we are providing updated information as of our record date, March 5, 2018.
As of the close of business on March 5, 2018, there were 126,210,853 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. The closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date was $3.83. The following table summarizes information regarding awards outstanding and shares remaining available for grant under the Existing Plan and the 2007 Plan and under the Inducement Plan, as of the close of business on March 5, 2018:
|
| Existing Plan and 2007 Plan |
|
| Inducement Plan |
| ||
Total shares underlying outstanding stock options |
|
| 5,646,918 |
|
| N/A |
| |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding stock options |
| $ | 8.10 |
|
| N/A |
| |
Weighted average remaining duration (years) of outstanding stock options |
| 6.06 years |
|
| N/A |
| ||
Total shares underlying outstanding unvested time-based restricted stock awards |
|
| 1,737,279 |
|
|
| 923,505 |
|
Total shares available for grant |
|
| 1,577,164 |
|
|
| 76,495 |
|
The Compensation Committee is focused on using equity to compensate executives in a manner that links executive and stockholder interests while focusing on the overall dilutive impact of that equity. The Compensation Committee balances the need to attract, motivate, and retain the level of executive talent required to execute the business strategy and achieve operational excellence at TETRA with the need to carefully consider and manage the usage of equity and the resulting equity dilution.
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
We manage our long-term dilution by limiting the number of shares subject to equity awards that we grant annually. The “burn rate” calculated below shows the dilution of our outstanding equity awards on our total outstanding shares. We have calculated the burn rate under our equity compensation program for the past three years, as set forth on the following table:
Time Period |
| Shares Subject to Options Awards |
|
| Shares Subject to Restricted Stock Awards |
|
| Total Adjusted Awards |
|
| Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding |
|
| Burn Rate (%) |
| |||||
Fiscal 2015 |
|
| 742,334 |
|
|
| 632,559 |
|
|
| 1,691,173 |
| (1) |
| 79,169,000 |
|
|
| 2.14 | % |
Fiscal 2016 |
|
| 851,292 |
|
|
| 1,226,491 |
|
|
| 2,691,029 |
| (2) |
| 87,286,000 |
|
|
| 3.08 | % |
Fiscal 2017 |
|
| 1,351,866 |
|
|
| 1,146,247 |
|
|
| 3,071,237 |
| (2) |
| 114,499,000 |
|
|
| 2.68 | % |
Three year average burn rate |
|
|
| 2.63 | % |
|
|
Estimated duration of shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan - Based on the 6,365,000 shares to be reserved under the 2018 Plan and certain assumptions described below, we expect that the share reserve of the 2018 Plan will cover awards for approximately two years. Our estimation of the duration of the 2018 Plan is based on a number of assumptions including the anticipated amount of annual grants under the 2018 Plan, the rate at which shares will be returned to the 2018 Plan reserve through forfeitures, cancellations and the like, and our future stock price performance. While the Committee believes that the assumptions utilized are reasonable, future share usage will differ to the extent that actual events differ from our assumptions.
Potential Dilution
The potential dilution from the 6,365,000 share reserve of the 2018 Plan is approximately 5.07% (calculated as the share reserve divided by the fully-diluted shares outstanding as of the Record Date). Including the 335,000 share reserve under the Director Plan, the potential dilution is approximately 5.34%. The board has considered this potential dilution level and believes it is within normal range for similarly situated companies.
In addition to overall dilution, in recommending the size of the share reserve under the 2018 Plan, as well as the Director Plan, the Compensation Committee considered annual dilution from our equity incentive plans, as shown on the following table:
|
| Basic Dilution (1) |
|
| Fully Diluted (2) |
| ||
December 31, 2015 |
|
| 9.4 | % |
|
| 8.6 | % |
December 31, 2016 |
|
| 9.6 | % |
|
| 8.8 | % |
December 31, 2017 |
|
| 8.6 | % |
|
| 7.9 | % |
|
|
|
|
Key Compensation Practices
The 2018 Plan includes a number of features that we believe are consistent with the interests of our stockholders and sound corporate governance practices, including the following:
No repricing of underwater options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval - The 2018 Plan prohibits actions to reprice options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) without stockholder approval.
No discounted option or SAR grants - The 2018 Plan requires that the exercise price of options or SARs be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANAudit Committee Report
|
|
Conservative share recycling provisions – We may not add back to the 2018 Plan’s share reserve shares that are delivered or withheld to pay the exercise price of an option award or to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with any award, shares that we repurchase using option exercise proceeds, and shares subject to a stock-settled SAR award that are not issued in connection with the settlement of that award.
No liberal definition of “change in control” - No change in control would be triggered by stockholder approval of a business combination transaction, the announcement or commencement of a tender offer, or any board assessment that a change in control may be imminent.
No automatic accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control - The 2018 Plan only provides for automatic accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control that involves a corporate transaction if such awards are not continued or assumed after the corporate transaction.
Description of the 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan
The major features of the 2018 Plan are summarized below. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2018 Plan, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.
Eligible Participants - Employees and consultants of the Company or any subsidiary will be eligible to receive awards under the 2018 Plan. As of March 5, 2018, there were approximately 2,600 employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and an indeterminate number of consultants who would be eligible to receive awards under the 2018 Plan.
Administration - The 2018 Plan will be administered by the Administrator, which is the Board of Directors or any of its committees that may be administering the plan in accordance with the terms of the plan. To the extent consistent with applicable law, different committees may administer the 2018 Plan with respect to different groups of service providers.
The Administrator has the authority to determine the fair market value of awards, persons to whom awards will be granted, the timing of awards, the type and number of shares covered by each award, the terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions of the awards as well as the manner in which awards are paid and settled. The Administrator may also prescribe, amend, or rescind rules to administer the 2018 Plan, adopt special provisions applicable to certain awards (including awards to foreign employees), interpret the 2018 Plan and any related award agreement, reconcile any inconsistency, correct any defect or supply an omission in the 2018 Plan and any related award agreement, determine in what circumstances an award shall be forfeited, accelerate the vesting or extend the exercise period of an award, otherwise amend the terms of outstanding awards to the extent permitted under the 2018 Plan, and require or permit the deferral of the settlement of an award. Unless an amendment to the terms of an award is necessary to comply with applicable tax laws, if a participant’s rights under an impacted award would be adversely affected by such an amendment, the participant must consent to the amendment.
Except in connection with equity restructurings and other situations in which share adjustments are specifically authorized, the 2018 Plan prohibits the Administrator from repricing any outstanding option or SAR awards without the prior approval of our stockholders.
Subject to certain limitations set forth in the 2018 Plan, the Administrator may also modify the terms of awards under the 2018 Plan with respect to participants who reside outside of the United States or who are employed by a non-U.S. subsidiary of the Company in order to comply with local legal or regulatory requirements.
Available Shares and Limitations on Awards - A maximum of 6,365,000 shares of our common stock may be the subject of awards and issued under the 2018 Plan, subject to adjustment for changes in our corporate structure or shares, as described below. The shares of common stock issuable under the 2018 Plan may come from our authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. The maximum number of shares that may be subject to stock
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
options or SARs granted to any single participant in any calendar year is 1,000,000 shares. The maximum number of shares that may be subject to restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards granted to any single participant in any calendar year is 1,000,000 shares.
Shares of common stock that are issued under the 2018 Plan or that are potentially issuable pursuant to outstanding awards will reduce the 2018 Plan’s share reserve by one share for each share issued or issuable pursuant to an outstanding award.
Any shares of common stock subject to an award under the 2018 Plan that expires, is cancelled or forfeited or is settled or paid in cash will, to the extent of such expiration, cancellation, forfeiture or cash settlement, automatically replenish the 2018 Plan share reserve and become available for future awards. The following shares shall not again become available for awards or replenish the share reserve: any shares tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price of an option or to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with any award; any shares repurchased by the Company using option exercise proceeds; and, and any shares subject to a stock-settled SAR award that are not issued in connection with the settlement of the SAR award. Awards that may be settled solely in cash will not reduce the share reserve under the 2018 Plan.
Share Adjustment Provisions – If certain transactions occur that cause the per share value of our common stock to change, such as stock dividends, stock splits, spin-offs, rights offerings or certain recapitalizations (referred to as an “equity restructuring”), the Administrator will equitably adjust (i) the aggregate number and kind of shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance under the 2018 Plan, (ii) the number and kind of shares or other securities subject to outstanding awards, (iii) the exercise price of outstanding stock options and SAR awards, and (iv) award limitations under the 2018 Plan. Other types of transactions may also impact our common stock, such as a reorganization, merger, consolidation or partial or complete liquidation of our Company. If there is such a transaction and the Administrator determines that adjustments of the type previously described in connection with the equity restructurings would be appropriate to prevent any dilution or enlargement of benefits under the 2018 Plan, the Administrator may make such adjustments as it deems equitable.
Types of Awards - The 2018 Plan permits us to award stock options, SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares, other stock-based awards, and cash-based awards to eligible recipients. These types of awards are described in more detail below.
Options - Employees of the Company or any subsidiary may be granted options to purchase common stock that qualify as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, and any eligible recipient may be granted options to purchase common stock that do not qualify as incentive stock options, referred to as “nonqualified stock options.” The per share exercise price to be paid by a participant at the time an option is exercised may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant. “Fair market value” under the 2018 Plan as of any date generally means the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. As of March 5, 2018, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $3.83.
The total purchase price of the shares to be purchased upon exercise of an option will be paid in full by the participant (including provision for any applicable tax withholding) in the manner determined by the Administrator and authorized by the award agreement and the 2018 Plan. Any shares delivered or withheld in payment of an exercise price will be valued at their fair market value on the exercise date and have an aggregate value equal to the purchase price of the shares being purchased.
An option will vest and become exercisable at such time, in such installments, and subject to such conditions as may be determined by the Administrator, and no option may have a term greater than 10 years from its date of grant. Until shares are issued upon exercise, no dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid or credited with respect to shares subject to an option award.
The aggregate fair market value of shares of our common stock with respect to which incentive stock options granted to any participant may first become exercisable during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. Any incentive stock options that become exercisable in excess of this amount will be treated as
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
nonqualified stock options. The maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock option awards under the 2018 Plan is 6,365,000.
Stock Appreciation Rights - A SAR award provides the right to receive a payment from us equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value as of the date of exercise of the number of shares of our common stock as to which the SAR is being exercised, and (ii) the fair market value of such shares as of the date the SAR was granted. The Administrator determines whether payment will be made in shares of our common stock, cash or a combination of both. The exercise price per share of a SAR award will be determined by the Administrator, but may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant. Until shares are issued upon exercise of a SAR award, no dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid or credited with respect to shares subject to a SAR award. A SAR award may not have a term greater than 10 years from its date of grant, and will be subject to such other terms and conditions, consistent with the terms of the 2018 Plan, as may be determined by the Administrator.
Restricted Stock Awards - A restricted stock award is an award of our common stock that vests at such times and in such installments as may be determined by the Administrator. Until it vests, the shares subject to the award are subject to restrictions on transferability and the possibility of forfeiture. The Administrator may impose such restrictions or conditions to the vesting of restricted stock awards as it deems appropriate, including that we, or any of our subsidiaries or business units, satisfy specified performance goals. No dividends or distributions payable with respect to shares that are subject to the unvested portion of a restricted stock award shall be issued or granted with respect to unvested awards, and instead shall be held by us and delivered to the participant, if at all, only upon such award becoming vested. Participants are entitled to vote restricted shares, including unvested restricted shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards - A restricted stock unit award is a right to receive shares of our common stock, cash, or other securities equal in value to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of vesting or settlement. Such awards may consist shares of restricted stock, performance shares, or performance unit awards that vest at such times, in such installments and subject to such conditions as may be determined by the Administrator. Until it vests, a restricted stock unit award is subject to restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture. No dividends or distributions payable with respect to shares that are subject to the unvested portion of a restricted stock unit award shall be issued or granted with respect to unvested awards, and instead shall be held by us and delivered to the participant, if at all, only upon such award becoming vested.
Other Stock-Based Awards - The Administrator may grant awards of common stock and other awards that are valued by reference to and/or payable in shares of our common stock under the 2018 Plan. The Administrator has discretion in determining the terms and conditions of such awards.
Cash-based Awards – The Administrator may grant cash-based awards in such amounts and subject to such other terms as the Administrator, in its discretion, determines to be appropriate.
Minimum Vesting Periods – Except as described in the following sentence, all awards are subject to a minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant. This minimum vesting requirement does not apply: (i) with respect to an acceleration of vesting upon a change in control in accordance with the 2018 Plan or (ii) to awards involving an aggregate number of shares up to 5 percent of the 2018 Plan’s share reserve. Generally, vesting will be suspended during any unpaid leave of absence.
Transferability of Awards - In general, no right or interest in any award under the 2018 Plan may be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than upon a participant’s death to a beneficiary designated pursuant to the plan or by will or the laws of descent and distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant.
Performance Based Awards - The 2018 Plan allows for performance-based awards. The performance measures specified in the 2018 Plan include the following: net income; cash flow; cash flow on investment; cash flow from operations; pre-tax or post-tax profit levels or earnings; operating income or earnings; closings; return on investment; earned value added; expenses; free cash flow; free cash flow per share; earnings; earnings per share;
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
net earnings per share; net earnings from continuing operations; sales growth; sales volume; economic profit; expense reduction; return on assets; return on net assets; return on equity; return on capital; return on sales; return on invested capital; organic revenue; growth in managed assets; total stockholder return; stock price; stock price appreciation; EBITDA; adjusted EBITDA; return in excess of cost of capital; profit in excess of cost of capital; capital expended; working capital; net operating profit after tax; operating margin; profit margin; adjusted revenue; revenue; net revenue; operating revenue; cash provided by operating activities; net cash provided by operating activities per share; cash conversion percentage; new sales; net new sales; cancellations; gross margin; gross margin percentage; revenue before deferral; implementation or completion of critical projects; research; horsepower; horsepower utilization rate; product development; government relations; compliance; mergers; acquisitions or sales of assets or subsidiaries; health; safety; environmental; debt level; cost reduction targets; equity ratios; depreciation and amortization; G&A expense or adjusted G&A measures; charge offs; and such other criteria as established by the Committee in its sole discretion from time to time.
Effect of Termination of Employment - Unless otherwise set forth in an applicable award agreement, if a participant ceases to be employed by or provide other services to us and our subsidiaries, awards under the 2018 Plan will be treated as set forth in the 2018 Plan. Unless otherwise set forth in the applicable award agreement, upon termination of a participant for any reason, all unvested and unexercisable portions of any outstanding awards will be immediately forfeited without consideration; however, the participant may exercise the currently vested and exercisable portions of his or her stock option awards within the time period specified in the award agreement. If the award agreement does not specify the time period within which the currently vested and exercisable portions of such award must be exercised, they shall be exercisable for three months following his or her termination date. Upon termination due to disability or death, the currently vested and exercisable portions of option awards may be exercised within the time period specified in the award agreement. If the award agreement does not specify the time period within which the currently vested and exercisable portions of such option must be exercised, they shall be exercisable for twelve months following his or her termination date.
Change in Control - For purposes of the 2018 Plan, a “change in control” generally refers to (i) the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 50% or more of the combined voting power of our voting securities, (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, other than to persons who beneficially own at least 50% of the combined voting power of our voting securities or a spin-off type transaction of such assets to our stockholders, (iii) our incumbent directors ceasing to constitute a majority of our Board during any consecutive 12-month period, or (iv) a merger or consolidation of us with another corporation (unless immediately following such merger or consolidation all or substantially all of our previous holders of voting securities beneficially own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the resulting entity in substantially the same proportions). A “corporate transaction” means a transaction described in either clause (ii) or clause (iv) of the foregoing sentence.
If a change in control of the Company that involves a corporate transaction occurs, then the consequences will be as described below unless otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement or other agreement with a participant.
If and to the extent outstanding awards are continued, assumed or substituted by a successor entity, and if within 24 months after the date of a change in control a participant’s employment or other service is involuntarily terminated without cause or is terminated by the participant for good reason (as such terms are defined in the 2018 Plan), (i) each of such participant’s outstanding options and SARs will become exercisable in full and remain exercisable for one year, (ii) each of such participant’s unvested awards other than options and SARs will fully vest, and (iii) to the extent vesting of an award is subject to the satisfaction of specified performance goals, such award will be deemed fully vested if the performance goals are deemed to have been satisfied at the target level of performance and the vested portion of the award at that level of performance is proportionate to the portion of the performance period elapsed prior to the participant’s termination of employment or other service. If and to the extent any outstanding award is not continued, assumed or replaced in connection with a change in control involving a corporate transaction, then (i) all such outstanding options and SARs will become fully exercisable for a period of time prior to the effective time of the corporate transaction and will then terminate at the effective time of the corporate transaction, (ii) all such awards other than options and SARs will fully vest immediately prior to the effective time of the corporate transaction, and (iii) to the extent vesting of an award is subject to the satisfaction of specified performance goals, such award will be deemed fully vested in the same manner as described above,
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
except that the proportionate vesting amount will be determined with respect to the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the time of the corporate transaction. Alternatively, if outstanding awards are not continued, assumed or replaced, the Committee may elect to cancel such awards at or immediately prior to the effective time of the corporate transaction in exchange for a cash payment with respect to each award in an amount equal to the excess, if any, between the fair market value of the shares subject to the award immediately prior to the effective date of such corporate transaction (which may be the fair market value of the consideration that would otherwise be received in the corporate transaction for the same number of shares) over the aggregate exercise price (if any) for the shares subject to such award (or, if there is no excess, such award may be terminated without payment). In the event of a change in control of the Company that does not involve a corporate transaction, the Committee may, in its discretion, take such action as it deems appropriate with respect to outstanding awards, which may include (i) making such adjustments or modifications to the awards then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate, which may include acceleration of vesting in full or in part, or (ii) providing for the cancellation of any outstanding award in exchange for a payment in an amount determined in the same manner as described in the preceding paragraph. The Committee is not required to treat all awards similarly in a change in control.
Effective Date and Term of the 2018 Plan - The 2018 Plan will become effective on the date it is approved by our stockholders. Unless terminated earlier, the 2018 Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the effective date. Awards outstanding under the 2018 Plan at the time it is terminated will continue in accordance with their terms and the terms of the 2018 Plan unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreements.
Amendment of the Plan -Our Board of Directors mayand our stockholders would need to take subsequent action to amend the 2018 Plan from time to time, but no amendments to the 2018 Plan will be effective without stockholder approval if such approval is required under applicable laws, regulations, or stock exchange rules. Ourour Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws.
The Board of Directors also may suspend or terminate the 2018 Plan at any time. No termination, suspension or amendment of the 2018 Plan may materially impair the rights of any participant under a previously granted award without the consent of the affected participant, except for amendments necessary to comply with applicable laws or stock exchange rules.
Amendment of Awards - The Administrator may amend the terms of any award subject to certain limitations, however,takes no such amendment may materially impair the rights of any participant under a previously granted award without the consent of the affected participant, except for amendments necessary to comply with applicable tax laws.
Clawback - Awards are subject to forfeiture or recovery pursuant to any clawback policy we may adopt from time to time, including any clawback policy adopted to comply with applicable laws, including the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reformposition and Consumer Protection Act.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The followingmakes no recommendation on this proposal. Proxies signed but where no voting instruction is a brief summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the transactions described under the 2018 Plan. This summary does not purport to address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation and does not describe state, local, or foreign tax consequences. This discussion is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder, and judicial and administrative interpretations under the Code and Treasury Regulations, all as in effect as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis) or different interpretation. This information is not applicable to participants who are not subject to U.S. federal income taxation.
Nonqualified Stock Options - A participant receiving a nonqualified stock option that has been issued with an exercise price not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date will not recognize income and we will not be allowed a tax deduction at the time that the nonqualified stock option is granted. When a participant exercises a nonqualified stock option, the difference between the option price and any higher market value of the stock on the date of exerciseindicated will be ordinary income to the participant and will be claimed as a deduction for federal income tax purposes by us. When a participant disposes of shares acquired by the exercise of the nonqualified stock option, any amount received in excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise will be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise date of the option. If the amount received upon subsequent disposition of the shares is less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, the loss will be
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
treated as short-term or long-term capital loss, depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise date of the option.
Incentive Stock Options - incentive stock options granted under the 2018 Plan are intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. A participant receiving a grant of incentive stock option will not recognize income and the we will not be allowed a deduction at the time the incentive stock option is granted. When a participant exercises an incentive stock option while employed by the us or our subsidiary, or within the three-month period (one year period following termination due to disability) after termination of employment, no ordinary income will be recognized by the participant at that time (and no tax deduction will be allowed to the us) but the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired via such exercise over the option price will be taken into account in determining the participant’s alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals. If the shares acquired upon exercise are not disposed of before (i) two years after the date of grant and (ii) one year after the date of transfer of the shares to the participant (i.e., the statutory holding periods for incentive stock options), the excess of the sale proceeds over the aggregate exercise price of such shares will be long-term capital gain, and we will not be entitled to any federal income tax deduction. Except in the event of death, if the shares are disposed of prior to the expiration of the statutory holding periods for incentive stock options (referred to as a “Disqualifying Disposition”), the excess of the fair market value of such shares at the time of exercise over the aggregate exercise price (but not more than the gain on the disposition if the disposition is a transaction on which a loss, if sustained, would be recognized) will be ordinary income at the time of such Disqualifying Disposition (and we will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in a like amount), and the balance of the gain, if any, will be capital gain (short-term or long-term depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise date of the incentive stock option). To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of stock (determined on the date of grant) with respect to which incentive stock options become exercisable for the first time during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such excess options will be treated as nonqualified stock options.
Special rule if option price is paid for in common stock. If a participant pays the exercise price of a nonqualified stock option or incentive stock option with previously-owned common stock of ours and the transaction is not a Disqualifying Disposition, the shares received equal to the number of shares surrendered are treated as having been received in a tax-free exchange. The shares received in excess of the number surrendered will not be taxable income if an incentive stock option is being exercised, but will be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of their fair market value if a nonqualified stock option is being exercised. The participant does not recognize income and the Company receives no tax deduction as a result of the tax-free portion of the exchange transaction. If the use of previously acquired incentive stock option shares to pay the exercise price of another incentive stock option constitutes a Disqualifying Disposition, the tax results described in the preceding paragraph will apply. The income tax treatment will apply to the shares disposed of, but will not affect the favorable tax treatment of the shares received.
Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Stock -A participant receiving a grant of a stock appreciation right or a restricted stock award will not recognize income, and we will not be allowed a deduction at the time such award is granted, unless the participant makes a Section 83(b) election, as described below, with respect to a restricted stock award. While an award remains unvested or otherwise subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, a participant will recognize compensation income equal to the amount of any dividends received and we will be allowed a tax deduction in a like amount. When an award vests or otherwise ceases to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the excess of the fair market value of the award on the date of vesting or the cessation of the substantial risk of forfeiture over the amount paid, if any, by the participant for the award will be ordinary income to the participant and will be claimed as a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes by us. Upon disposition of the shares received, the gain or loss recognized by the participant will be treated as capital gain or loss, and the capital gain or loss will be short-term or long-term depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the vesting or cessation of the substantial risk of forfeiture. However, if the participant files a Section 83(b) election with the Internal Revenue Service within 30 days after the date of grant of restricted stock, the participant’s ordinary income, commencement of the holding period, and the tax deduction will be determined as of the date of grant. In such a case, the amount of ordinary income recognized by such participant and deductible by us will be equal to the excess of the fair market value of the award as of the date of grant over the amount paid, if any, by the participant for the award. If a Section 83(b) election is made and the participant thereafter forfeits such award, no refund or deduction will be allowed for the amount previously included in the participant’s income.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANvoted ABSTAIN.
Other Awards- The current federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the 2018 Plan generally follow certain basic patterns. Restricted stock unit awards generally result in income recognition by a participant at the time payment of such an award is made in an amount equal to the amount paid in cash or the then-current fair market value of the shares received, as applicable. In the case of another stock-based award, a participant will generally recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to any cash received and the fair market value of any common stock received on the date of payment or delivery, provided that the award is either exempt from or complies with applicable requirements under Section 409A of the Code. In that taxable year, we will receive a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income amount recognized by the participant.
Parachute Payments - Under the “golden parachute” provisions of Section 280G of the Code, the accelerated vesting of stock options and benefits paid under other incentive awards granted under the 2018 Plan in connection with a change in control of TETRA, as described under Section 280G, may be required to be valued and taken into account in determining whether participants have received compensatory payments, contingent on the change in control, in excess of certain limits under Section 280G. If these limits are exceeded, a portion of the amounts payable to the participant may be subject to an additional 20% federal tax imposed on the participant and be nondeductible to us. If a participant’s rights under the 2018 Plan are accelerated as a result of a change of control and the participant is a “disqualified individual” under Section 280G, the then present value of any accelerated rights received by such participant may be included in determining whether the participant received an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G.
Section 409A of the Code - Section 409A of the Code applies to certain plans providing deferred compensation to employees, non-employee directors, consultants and other service providers. Section 409A could potentially apply to certain of the different types of incentive awards available under the 2018 Plan. Generally, to the extent that the tax deferral of an award granted under the 2018 Plan fails to meet either an exemption from the application of Section 409A, or the requirements for compliance with Section 409A, such award may be subject to taxation and tax penalties under Section 409A. We intend to structure awards granted under the 2018 Plan and administer the 2018 Plan in a manner that either complies with or is exempt from the requirements of Section 409A. If any 2018 Plan provision or any outstanding award would result in the imposition of a tax or penalty under Section 409A, we may reform that 2018 Plan provision or award (to the extent permitted by Section 409A) to avoid imposition of the tax or penalty, and no such action taken to comply with Section 409A, or an exemption thereunder, will be deemed to adversely affect the participant’s rights to the award.
Federal Tax Withholding - Income realized by an employee upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option or the receipt of shares under another type of award is generally subject to withholding of federal, state, and local income tax, as well as to withholding of the participant’s share of tax under the Federal Insurance Contribution Act. Because the withholding requirement applies only to employees, a non-employee participant who receives an award under the 2018 Plan is not subject to tax withholding by us.
To satisfy federal income tax withholding requirements, we have the right to require that, as a condition to delivery of any certificate for common stock, the participant remit to us an amount sufficient to satisfy the withholding requirements. Alternatively, we may withhold a portion of the shares (valued at fair market value) that otherwise would be issued to the participant to satisfy all or part of the withholding tax obligations. Tax withholding does not represent an increase in the participant’s total income tax obligation since it is fully credited toward the participant’s tax liability for the year. Additionally, withholding does not affect the participant’s basis in shares of common stock received under the 2018 Plan.
ERISA - The 2018 Plan is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The 2018 Plan is not a qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Code.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — APPROVAL OF 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The 2018 Plan will not become effective until it is approved by our stockholders and the Administrator has not yet approved any awards under, or subject to, the 2018 Plan. Because all awards under the 2018 Plan are discretionary with the Administrator, neither the number nor types of 2018 Plan awards to be received by or allocated to particular participants or groups of participants is presently determinable. Information regarding awards made under the Existing Plan during fiscal 2017 to our named executive officers is provided under “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” on page 72.
Pursuant to our bylaws, approvalApproval of the 2018 PlanProposal No. 4, on an advisory basis, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the common shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting of stockholders. In additionAbstentions will be counted as present and entitled to the vote required by our bylaws described above, under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, approval of the 2018 Plan requires approval of a majority of votes cast on the proposal and will therefore have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Broker non-votes will have no impact on this proposal if a quorum is present. Please see the "General Information About the Meeting and Voting" section in this proxy statementProxy Statement for additional information.
If the stockholders approve the 2018 Plan, it will be effective as of May 4, 2018. A copy of the 2018 Plan is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. The preceding description of the 2018 Plan is not intended to be complete and is qualified by reference to Appendix A, which contains the complete text of the 2018 Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANCorporate Governance
Proposal No. 5 — Approval of 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan
|
Our stockholders are being asked to approve our 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan, which is referred to in this description as the “Director Plan”. The Director Plan includes a number of features that our Board of Directors believes are consistent with the interests of our stockholders and sound corporate governance practices, and will provide us with a share reserve that will enable us to continue to provide a competitive compensation package to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as our non-employee directors.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the Director Plan, and proxies returned will be so voted unless contrary instructions are indicated thereon.
The 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Existing Plan”) has been used in recent years to provide equity-based compensation to our non-employee directors. As discussed in Proposal 4 regarding the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), we have elected to establish, and seek approval of, a stand-alone equity plan for our non-employee directors. Accordingly, on March 15, 2018, our Board of Directors, at the recommendation of our Compensation Committee (“Committee”), approved the Director Plan, subject to approval by our stockholders at our 2018 annual meeting. The Director Plan will become effective on the date it is approved by our stockholders.
We believe that, because the market for qualified director candidates is highly competitive, our successful performance depends on its ability to offer fair compensation packages to its non-employee directors that are competitive with our peers. In that regard, the ability to offer equity-based compensation to our non-employee directors, which both aligns the behavior of non-employee directors with stockholder interests and provides a retention tool, is vital to the our future growth and success.
The proposed Director Plan provides a means of retaining the services of current non-employee directors and attracting qualified persons to serve as non-employee directors in the future. The equity awards to be granted to non-employee directors will provide significant incentives to them to remain on the Board of Directors and to devote their best efforts to the success of our business and the enhancement of stockholder value in the future.
The number of shares of our common stock that may be the subject of awards and issued under the Director Plan is 335,000. If the Director Plan is approved by our stockholders, no new awards to non-employee directors will be made under the Existing Plan. If our stockholders do not approve the Director Plan, equity-based grants to our non-employee directors will continue to be made under our Existing Plan until the Existing Plan expires or shares available for grants under the Existing Plan are no longer available.
Stockholder approval of the Director Plan is being sought in order to satisfy the stockholder approval requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Factors Considered in Setting Size of Requested Share Reserve
In setting the proposed number of shares reserved and issuable under the Director Plan, the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors considered many of the same factors discussed in Proposal No. 4 regarding the proposed 2018 Plan, including outstanding awards and the number of shares available for grant under the Existing Plan, the 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”) and the 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan (the “Inducement Plan”) as well as the number of shares being requested under the 2018 Plan. We have also considered the potential dilution from the shares requested under the Director Plan in its own accord and in conjunction with the 2018 Plan.
Based upon prior equity-based awards to our non-employee directors and certain assumptions regarding our future stock price and the number of directors on our Board of Directors, we believe that the requested share reserve for the Director Plan will cover awards for approximately two years.
The Director Plan includes a number of features that we believe are consistent with the interests of our stockholders and sound corporate governance practices, including the following:
No repricing of underwater options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval - The Director Plan prohibits, without stockholder approval, actions to reprice options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”).
No discounted option or SAR grants - The Director Plan requires that the exercise price of options or SARs be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Conservative share recycling provisions – We may not add back to the Directors Plan’s share reserve shares that are delivered or withheld to pay the exercise price of an option award or to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with any awards, shares that we repurchase using option exercise proceeds, or shares subject to a stock-settled SAR award that are not issued in connection with the settlement of that award.
No liberal definition of “change in control” - No change in control would be triggered by stockholder approval of a business combination transaction, the announcement or commencement of a tender offer, or any board assessment that a change in control may be imminent.
Description of the 2018 Director Plan
The major features of the Director Plan are summarized below. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Director Plan, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.
Eligible Participants – Only our non-employee directors will be eligible to receive awards under the Director Plan. As of March 5, 2018, there were 8 non-employee directors on the Board of Directors. After the Annual Meeting, there will be 6 non-employee directors.
Administration - The Director Plan will be administered by the Administrator, which is the Board of Directors or a committee thereof that may be administering the plan in accordance with the terms of the plan.
The Administrator has the authority to determine the fair market value of awards, non-employee directors to whom awards will be granted, the timing of awards, the type and number of shares covered by each award, the terms, conditions, and restrictions of the awards as well as the manner in which awards are paid and settled. The Administrator may also prescribe, amend, or rescind rules to administer the Director Plan, interpret the Director Plan and any related award agreement, reconcile any inconsistency, correct any defect or supply an omission in the Director Plan and any related award agreement, determine in what circumstances an award shall be forfeited,
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
accelerate the vesting or extend the exercise period of an award, otherwise amend the terms of outstanding awards to the extent permitted under the Director Plan, and require or permit the deferral of the settlement of an award. Unless an amendment to the terms of an award is necessary to comply with applicable tax laws, a participant whose rights under an affected award would be materially impaired by such an amendment must consent to the amendment.
Except in connection with equity restructurings and other situations in which share adjustments are specifically authorized, the Director Plan prohibits the Administrator from repricing any outstanding option or SAR awards without the prior approval of our stockholders.
Available Shares and Limitations on Awards - A maximum of 335,000 shares of our common stock may be the subject of awards and issued under the Director Plan, subject to adjustment for changes in our corporate structure or shares, as described below. The shares of common stock issuable under the Director Plan may come from authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. No outside director may be granted during any calendar year awards having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined on the date of grant, in excess of $300,000.
Shares of common stock that are issued under the Director Plan or that are potentially issuable pursuant to outstanding awards will reduce the Director Plan’s share reserve by one share for each share issued or issuable pursuant to an award.
Any shares of common stock subject to an award under the Director Plan that expires, is cancelled or forfeited or is settled or paid in cash will, to the extent of such expiration, cancellation, forfeiture or cash settlement, automatically replenish the Director Plan share reserve and become available for future awards. The following shares shall not again become available for awards or replenish the share reserve: any shares tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price, any shares repurchased by us using option exercise proceeds, and any shares subject to a stock-settled SAR award that are not issued in connection with the settlement of the SAR award. Awards that may be settled solely in cash will not reduce the share reserve under the Director Plan.
Share Adjustment Provisions – If certain transactions occur that cause the per share value of our common stock to change, such as stock dividends, stock splits, spin-offs, rights offerings or certain recapitalizations (referred to as “equity restructurings”), the Administrator will equitably adjust (i) the aggregate number and kind of shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance under the Director Plan, (ii) the number and kind of shares or other securities subject to outstanding awards, (iii) the exercise price of outstanding stock options and SAR awards and (iv) award limitations prescribed by the Director Plan. Other types of transactions may also affect our common stock, such as a reorganization, merger, consolidation or partial or complete liquidation of TETRA. If there is such a transaction and the Administrator determines that adjustments of the type previously described in connection with the equity restructurings would be appropriate to prevent any dilution or enlargement of benefits under the Director Plan, the Administrator may make such adjustments as it deems equitable.
Types of Awards - The Director Plan permits us to award stock options, SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards, and cash-based awards to our non-employee directors. These types of awards are described in more detail below.
Options - Our Non-employee directors may be granted options to purchase common stock that do not qualify as incentive stock options, referred to as “nonqualified stock options.” The per share exercise price to be paid by a participant at the time an option is exercised may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant. “Fair market value” under the Director Plan as of any date generally means the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. As of March 5, 2018, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $3.83.
The total purchase price of the shares to be purchased upon exercise of an option will be paid in full by the participant (including provision for any applicable tax withholding) in the manner determined by the Administrator and authorized by the award agreement and the Director Plan. Any shares delivered in
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
payment of an exercise price will be valued at their fair market value on the exercise date and have an aggregate value equal to the purchase price of the shares being purchased.
An option will vest and become exercisable at such time, in such installments and subject to such conditions as may be determined by the Administrator, and no option may have a term greater than 10 years from its date of grant. Until shares are issued upon exercise, no dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid or credited with respect to shares subject to an option award.
Stock Appreciation Rights - A SAR award provides the right to receive a payment from us equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value as of the date of exercise of the number of shares of our common stock as to which the SAR is being exercised, and (ii) the fair market value of such shares as of the date the SAR was granted. The Administrator determines whether payment will be made in shares of our common stock, cash or a combination of both. The exercise price per share of a SAR award will be determined by the Administrator, but may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant. Until shares are issued upon exercise of a SAR award, no dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid or credited with respect to shares subject to a SAR award. A SAR award may not have a term greater than 10 years from its date of grant, and will be subject to such other terms and conditions, consistent with the terms of the Director Plan, as may be determined by the Administrator.
Restricted Stock Awards - A restricted stock award is an award of our common stock that vests at such times and in such installments as may be determined by the Administrator. Until it vests, the shares subject to the award are subject to restrictions on transferability and the possibility of forfeiture. The Administrator may impose such restrictions or conditions to the vesting of restricted stock awards as it deems appropriate, including that we, or any of our subsidiaries or business units, satisfy specified performance goals. No dividends or distributions payable with respect to shares that are subject to the unvested portion of a restricted stock award shall be issued or granted with respect to unvested awards, and instead shall be held by us and delivered to the participant, if at all, only upon such award becoming vested. Participants are entitled to vote restricted shares, including unvested restricted shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards - A restricted stock unit award is a right to receive shares of our common stock, cash, or other securities equal in value to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of vesting or settlement. Such awards may consist shares of restricted stock, performance shares, or performance unit awards that vest at such times, in such installments and subject to such conditions as may be determined by the Administrator. Until it vests, a restricted stock unit award is subject to restrictions and the possibility of forfeiture. No dividends or distributions payable with respect to shares that are subject to the unvested portion of a restricted stock unit award shall be issued or granted with respect to unvested awards, and instead shall be held by us and delivered to the participant, if at all, only upon such award becoming vested.
Other Stock-Based Awards - The Administrator may grant awards of common stock and other awards that are valued by reference to and/or payable in shares of our common stock under the Director Plan. The Administrator has discretion in determining the terms and conditions of such awards.
Cash-based Awards – The Administrator may grant cash-based awards in such amounts and subject to such other terms as the Administrator, in its discretion, determines to be appropriate.
Transferability of Awards - In general, no right or interest in any award under the Director Plan may be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than upon a participant’s death to a beneficiary designated pursuant to the plan or by will or the laws of descent and distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant.
Effect of Termination of Service - Unless otherwise set forth in an applicable award agreement, if a participant ceases to be a non-employee director, awards under the Director Plan will be treated as set forth in the Director Plan. Unless otherwise set forth in the applicable award agreement, upon ceasing to be a non-employee director
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
for any reason, all unvested and unexercisable portions of any outstanding awards will be immediately forfeited without consideration; however, the participant may exercise the currently vested and exercisable portions of his or her nonqualified stock option awards within the time period specified in the award agreement. If the award agreement does not specify the time period within which the currently vested and exercisable portions of such award must be exercised, they shall be exercisable for three months following his or her termination date. Upon termination due to disability or death, the currently vested and exercisable portions of nonqualified stock option awards may be exercised within the time period specified in the award agreement. If the award agreement does not specify the time period within which the currently vested and exercisable portions of such award must be exercised, they shall be exercisable for twelve months following his or her termination date.
Change in Control - If a change in control of TETRA occurs, then unless otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement, (i) each of the participant’s outstanding options and SARs will become exercisable in full and remain exercisable for one year, and (ii) each of the participant’s unvested awards other than nonqualified stock options and SAR awards will fully vest. For purposes of the Director Plan, a “change in control” generally refers to (i) the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 50% or more of the combined voting power of our voting securities, (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, other than to persons who beneficially own at least 50% of the combined voting power of our voting securities or a spin-off type transaction of such assets to our stockholders, (iii) our incumbent directors ceasing to constitute a majority of our Board during any consecutive 12-month period, or (iv) a merger or consolidation of us with another corporation (unless immediately following such merger or consolidation all or substantially all of our previous holders of voting securities beneficially own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the resulting entity in substantially the same proportions).
Effective Date and Term of the Director Plan - The Director Plan will become effective on the date it is approved by our stockholders. Unless terminated earlier, the Director Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the effective date. Awards outstanding under the Director Plan at the time it is terminated will continue in accordance with their terms and the terms of the Director Plan unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreements.
Amendment of the Plan - Our Board of Directors may amend the Director Plan from time to time, but no amendments to the Director Plan will be effective without stockholder approval if such approval is required under applicable laws, regulations or stock exchange rules. Our Board of Directors also may suspend or terminate the Director Plan at any time. No termination, suspension or amendment of the Director Plan may materially impair the rights of any participant under a previously granted award without the consent of the affected participant, except for amendments necessary to comply with applicable laws or stock exchange rules.
Amendment of Awards - The Administrator may amend the terms of any award subject to certain limitations, however, no such amendment may materially impair the rights of any participant under a previously granted award without the consent of the affected participant, except for amendments necessary to comply with applicable tax laws.
Clawback - Awards are subject to forfeiture or recovery pursuant to any clawback policy we may adopt from time to time, including any clawback policy adopted to comply with applicable laws, including the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the transactions described under the Director Plan. This summary does not purport to address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation and does not describe state, local, or foreign tax consequences. This discussion is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder, and judicial and administrative interpretations under the Code and Treasury Regulations, all as in effect as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis) or different interpretation. This information is not applicable to participants who are not subject to U.S. federal income taxation.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Nonqualified Stock Options- A participant receiving a nonqualified stock option that has been issued with an exercise price not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date will not recognize income and we will not be allowed a tax deduction at the time that the nonqualified stock option is granted. When a participant exercises a nonqualified stock option, the difference between the option price and any higher market value of the stock on the date of exercise will be ordinary income to the participant and will be claimed as a deduction for federal income tax purposes by us. When a participant disposes of shares acquired by the exercise of the nonqualified stock option, any amount received in excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise will be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise date of the option. If the amount received upon subsequent disposition of the shares is less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, the loss will be treated as short-term or long-term capital loss, depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the exercise date of the option.
Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Stock -A participant receiving a grant of a stock appreciation right or a restricted stock award will not recognize income, and we will not be allowed a deduction at the time such award is granted, unless the participant makes a Section 83(b) election, as described below, with respect to a restricted stock award. While an award remains unvested or otherwise subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, a participant will recognize compensation income equal to the amount of any dividends received and us will be allowed a tax deduction in a like amount. When an award vests or otherwise ceases to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the excess of the fair market value of the award on the date of vesting or the cessation of the substantial risk of forfeiture over the amount paid, if any, by the participant for the award will be ordinary income to the participant and will be claimed as a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes by us. Upon disposition of the shares received, the gain or loss recognized by the participant will be treated as capital gain or loss, and the capital gain or loss will be short-term or long-term depending upon whether the participant held the shares for more than one year following the vesting or cessation of the substantial risk of forfeiture. However, if the participant files a Section 83(b) election with the Internal Revenue Service within 30 days after the date of grant of restricted stock, the participant’s ordinary income, commencement of the holding period. and the tax deduction will be determined as of the date of grant. In such a case, the amount of ordinary income recognized by such participant and deductible by us will be equal to the excess of the fair market value of the award as of the date of grant over the amount paid, if any, by the participant for the award. If a Section 83(b) election is made and the participant thereafter forfeits such award, no refund or deduction will be allowed for the amount previously included in the participant’s income.
Other Awards - The current federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the Director Plan generally follow certain basic patterns. Restricted stock unit awards generally result in income recognition by a participant at the time payment of such an award is made in an amount equal to the amount paid in cash or the then-current fair market value of the shares received, as applicable. In the case of another stock-based award, a participant will generally recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to any cash received and the fair market value of any common stock received on the date of payment or delivery, provided that the award is either exempt from or complies with applicable requirements under Section 409A of the Code. In that taxable year, we will receive a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income amount recognized by the participant.
Section 409A of the Code - Section 409A of the Code applies to certain plans providing deferred compensation to non-employee directors. Section 409A could potentially apply to certain of the different types of incentive awards available under the Director Plan. Generally, to the extent that the tax deferral of an award granted under the Director Plan fails to meet either an exemption from the application of Section 409A, or the requirements for compliance with Section 409A, such award may be subject to taxation and tax penalties under Section 409A. We intend to structure awards granted under the Director Plan and administer the Director Plan in a manner that either complies with or is exempt from the requirements of Section 409A. If any Director Plan provision or any outstanding award would result in the imposition of a tax or penalty under Section 409A, we may reform that Director Plan provision or award (to the extent permitted by Section 409A) to avoid imposition of the tax or penalty, and no such action taken to comply with Section 409A, or an exemption thereunder, will be deemed to adversely affect the participant’s rights to the award.
ERISA - The Director Plan is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Director Plan is not a qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Code.
|
|
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — APPROVAL OF 2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Awards Under the Director Plan
The Director Plan will not become effective until it is approved by our stockholders and the Administrator has not yet approved any awards under, or subject to, the Director Plan. Because all awards under the Director Plan are discretionary with the Administrator, neither the number nor types of Director Plan awards to be received by or allocated to particular participants or groups of participants is presently determinable. Information regarding awards made under the Existing Plans during fiscal 2017 to our non-employee directors is provided under “Director Compensation Table” on page 80.
Pursuant to our bylaws, approval of the 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the common shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting of stockholders. In addition to the vote required by our bylaws described above, under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, approval of the 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan requires approval of a majority of votes cast on the proposal.
Please see the "General Information About the Meeting and Voting" section in this proxy statement for additional information.
If the stockholders approve the Director Plan, it will be effective as of May 4, 2018. A copy of the Director Plan is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B. The preceding description of the Director Plan is not intended to be complete and is qualified by reference to Appendix B, which contains the complete text of the Director Plan.
|
|
INFORMATION ABOUT US |
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address applicable NYSE corporate governance listing requirements and various other corporate governance matters. The Board of Directors believes the Corporate Governance Guidelines assist in ensuring that:
the Board of Directors is independent from management;
the Board of Directors adequately performs its function as the overseer of management, and
the interests of management and the Board of Directors align with the interests of our stockholders.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a majority vote principle in connection with the election of our directors. This means that in an uncontested election (that is, an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” his or her election must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board unless such nominee has previously submitted an irrevocable letter of resignation in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that the Board of Directors may require, in order for any incumbent director to become a nominee for further service on the Board of Directors, that such incumbent director submit to the Board of Directors an irrevocable letter of resignation. The irrevocable letter of resignation is conditioned upon, and will not become effective until there has been (i) a failure by that nominee to receive more votes “for” his or her election than votes “withheld” from his or her election in any uncontested election of directors and (ii) acceptance of the resignation by the Board of Directors. In the event a director receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than “for” his or her election, the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding the action to be taken with respect to the tendered resignation. A director whose resignation is being considered will not participate in any committee or Board of Directors meetings where his or her resignation is being considered. The Board of Directors will consider the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee’s recommendation and decide whether to accept the tendered resignation within 90 days following the certification of the stockholder vote, and the Board of Directors will promptly and publicly disclose its decision. Each of the nominees for election to the Board of Directors has submitted an irrevocable letter of resignation in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Corporate Governance Documents
The following governance documents are available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations area of our website at www.tetratec.com and are also available upon written request addressed to Corporate Secretary, TETRA Technologies, Inc., 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas 77380:
Corporate Governance Guidelines which govern the qualifications and conduct of the Board of Directors.
Audit Committee Charter.
Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee Charter.
Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee Charter.
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Code of Business Conduct for directors, officers, and employees. The key principles of this code are honesty, loyalty, fairness, and accountability.
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. The key principles of this code include acting legally and ethically, promoting honest business conduct, and providing timely and meaningful public disclosures to our stockholders.
Supplier Code of Business Conduct which provides guidance on our expectations from our suppliers, vendors, contractors, and others with whom we do business.
Anti-Corruption Policy which provides targeted guidance in the very important areas of anti-corruption and anti-bribery compliance.
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers, which are designed to align the interests of our executive officers and directors with the interests of our stockholders.
Policy and Procedures for Receipt and Treatment of Complaints Related to Accounting and Compliance Matters (Whistleblower Policy), which provides for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters, or possible violations of laws, rules, or regulations applicable to us and the confidential, anonymous submission of concerns regarding those matters.
Human Rights Standards which set forth our commitment to supporting international principles aimed at protecting and promoting universal human rights.
If any substantive amendments are made to the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, the nature of such amendment will be disclosed on our website. In addition, if a waiver from either the Code of Business Conduct or the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is granted to an executive officer, director, or principal accounting officer, the nature of such waiver will be disclosed on our website.
Director Independence and Transactions Considered in Independence Determinations
Director Independence. The NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our Board of Directors to be comprised of at least a majority of independent directors. Our Board of Directors determines independence in accordance with the listing requirements of the NYSE, taking into consideration such facts and circumstances as it considers relevant. In order to assist the Board of Directors in making its determination of whether directors are independent, each director completed and delivered to us a questionnaire designed to solicit accurate and complete information that may be relevant in making such independence determinations. The Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee, reviewed summaries of responses to such questionnaires and such other information considered relevant with respect to the existence of any relationships between a director and us. All of the directors who serve as members of the Audit Committee, Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee and the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee are independent as required by the NYSE corporate governance rules. Under these rules, Audit Committee members also satisfy the separate SEC independence requirements, and the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee members satisfy the additional NYSE independence requirements.
20 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Corporate Governance
The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following directors are independent:
Transactions Considered in Independence Determinations. In making its independence determinations, our Board of Directors considered transactions that occurred between us and entities associated with the independent directors and their immediate family members.
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Mr. Sullivan is a director of SM Energy Company and Legacy Reserves GP LLC, and Mr. Winkler is a director of Eclipse Resources. Each of these entitiesCompany. SM Energy or theirits affiliates is a customer of TETRA, or CSI Compressco, although the revenues received from them areMr. Sullivan’s interest in these transactions was not considered to be material. In addition, Messrs. Sullivanmaterial and Coombs are directors of CSI Compressco GP Inc., the general partner of CSI Compressco, which are subsidiaries of ours. We have an ongoing business relationship with CSI Compressco.therefore did not impact his independence. We have considered the foregoing and have concluded that these transactions and relationships did not automatically disqualify Messrs.Mr. Sullivan Winkler, and Coombs from being considered independent under the rules of the NYSE. Our Board of Directors has also determined that none of Messrs.Mr. Sullivan Winkler, or Coombs hasdoes not have a material interest in these transactions and that eachhe is independent.
Ms. McGee, through SDBM, provided consulting services to TETRA from August 11, 2021 to December 31, 2021 and earned $9,814 during the term of themthe agreement. We have considered the foregoing and have concluded that this relationship did not disqualify Ms. McGee from being considered independent under the rules of the NYSE. In addition, with respect to Ms. McGee’s service on the HCMCC, our Board of Directors determined that the consulting fees received by Ms. McGee prior to her appointment did not impair her independence from management or ability to make independent executive compensation judgments and determined that she is independent.independent for board and all committee purposes.
Based upon his ongoing employment with us, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. BrightmanMurphy is not independent.
Board Leadership Structure; Separation of Positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
As set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we require the separation of the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors believes that the separation of these positions strengthens the independence of our Board of Directors and its ability to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders. Mr. Brightman, asOur Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for TETRA and provides the day-to-day leadership of its operations and performance, while Mr. Sullivan, asour Chairman provides overall leadership to our Board of Directors in its oversight function. AsOur Chairman Mr. Sullivan serves as the presiding director of executive sessions of the non-management and independent directors.
Our board is responsible for, and committed to, the oversight of the business of TETRA. In carrying out this responsibility, our board advises senior management, to help drivewhich is, in turn, responsible for the operations of our Company and driving long term value creation for our stockholders. Our board discusses and receives regular updates on a wide variety of matters affecting TETRA.
TETRA and the primary focus areas are business strategy, risk management, financial reporting and compliance, corporate governance and sustainability, CEO performance,
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 21 |
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
executive succession planning, and diversity and inclusion. In many of these areas, significant responsibilities are delegated to the board’s committees, which are responsible for reporting to the board on their activities and actions. Please refer to “Board Role in Risk Oversight” for additional information on our committees.
Business Strategy
Our board takes an active role in overseeing senior management’s formulation and implementation of our strategic plans.
OurIn addition to our annual, multi-day strategic planning board meeting, our board receives presentations covering company-wide, divisional, and regional strategy and discusses these matters throughout the year both during and outside of board meetings.
Our board’s focus on overseeingoversight of risk management enhances our directors’ abilityabilities to provide insight and feedback to senior management and, if necessary, challengeschallenge senior management on our risks associated with our strategic direction.
Our Chairman of the board helps facilitate our board’s oversight of strategy by ensuring that the directors receive adequate information about strategy and by discussing strategy with independent directors at executive sessions.
Board Role in Risk Oversight
It is our management’s responsibility to manage risks and to bring to the Board of Directors’ attention any aspects of our business or operations that may give rise to a material level of risk. Our Chief Executive Officer has ultimate responsibility for management of our business, including enterprise level risks and the risk management program and processes, and brings members of management from various business or administrative areas into meetings of the Board of Directors from time to time to make presentations and to provide insight to the board, including insight into areas of potential risk. Such risks include competition risks, industry risks, economic risks, credit and liquidity risks, risks from operations, risks posed by significant litigation and regulatory matters, cyber security risks, risks related to our compensation program and employee retention, and risks related to acquisitions and dispositions. The Board of Directors, either directly or through its committees, reviews with our management policies, strategic initiatives, and other actions designed to mitigate various types of risk. Board Oversight of COVID-19 Impact and Company Responses. The Board has received frequent updates on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our employees, operations, and customers and reviewed with management the various measures taken to protect people’s health and maintain continuity of service for our customers. This Board oversight has included updates at board meetings held from mid-March 2020 through the filing of this Proxy Statement. |
22 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Corporate Governance
Enterprise Risk Management. The board’s oversight of risk management is enhanced by the detailed information it receives as a result of our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program. Our ERM process is designed to identify potential key risks that may affect TETRA and manage risk within an established level of acceptable risk. The ERM assessment is performed quarterly and involves evaluation of key risk indicators. During the quarterly ERM assessment, management will review and, to the extent necessary, update or supplement a list of key risks affecting each respective business area along with the corresponding risk mitigation strategies. As part of the risk monitoring process, management evaluates each risk according to its likelihood of occurrence and, assuming that the development or event at risk was to occur, its most likely impact on our financial condition, operations, industry or reputation. The most significant risk items identified in each quarterly assessment are discussed with the Audit Committee. In addition, a complete copy of the ERM report is distributed to and discussed by the full board on an annual basis.
Cyber Security Risk Oversight. The board, with the assistance and support of the Audit Committee, oversees our management of cyber security risk. TETRA has taken a number of steps to manage risks and mitigate our cyber security risk, including entering into an information security risk insurance policy, establishing a dedicated IT security resource, engaging an independent firm to bringassess our security, improving our security posture, and rolling out continuing information security training to our employees. In addition, our IT organization has completed a ransomware incident response exercise and our management team has recently participated in a cyber incident response exercise conducted by an independent firm. At each quarterly meeting the BoardAudit Committee receives an update from management regarding our cyber security risk profile and the board receives a cyber security report from management on an annual basis.
Human Capital Management Risk Oversight. We believe our efforts around human capital management add long-term value to our business and foster an inclusive culture for our employees. We have demonstrated a commitment to diversity through the people who guide our Company – starting at the top. Three of Directors’ attention any aspectsthe seven director nominees (43% of our businessnominees) are women or operations that may give riseracially diverse. Our board, Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee and our other committees play a role in the active oversight of our human capital management program. This is accomplished by focusing on these key areas: safety, talent development, inclusion and diversity, ethics and compliance, talent acquisition and retention, and compensation and benefits.
Our Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee receives a report at each meeting regarding the performance of our human capital initiatives compared to a material level of risk. Our Chief Executive Officer brings members of management from various business or administrative areas into meetings ofkey performance indicators established by the Board of Directors from time to time to make presentations and to provide insight to the board, including insight into areas of potential risk. Such risks include competition risks, industry risks, economic risks, credit and liquidity risks, risks from operations, risks posed by significant litigation and regulatory matters, cyber security risks, and risks related to acquisitions and dispositions. The Board of Directors, either directly or through its committees, reviews with our management policies, strategic initiatives,committee and other actions designedhuman capital management matters, such as talent acquisition and retention, key employee compensation, talent development, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Our Audit Committee receives quarterly updates on our ethics and compliance program.
Our Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee ensures that we are seeking director candidates who will bring a diversity of background, experience, and viewpoints to mitigate various typesour board.
Our Board receives quarterly updates regarding the performance of risk. our HSE program
Our Board and Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee receive an annual update on succession plans for senior leadership.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 23 |
Corporate Governance
Board Oversight of Human Capital Management Our board and its committees are actively involved in overseeing our human capital management program. |
24 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Corporate Governance
The following table summarizes the role of the board and each of its committees in overseeing risk:
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors |
|
| Audit Committee | |
| ||||
The Board of Directors has ultimate responsibility for protecting stockholder value. Among other things, our Board of Directors is responsible for understanding the risks to which we are exposed, approving management’s strategy to manage these risks, and measuring management’s performance against the strategy. The Board of Directors’ responsibilities include, but are not limited to, appointing our Chief Executive Officer, monitoring our performance relative to our goals, strategies, and the performance of our competitors, reviewing and approving our annual budget, our compliance with rules and regulations, |
| Our Audit Committee oversees risks associated with the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and matters reported to the Audit Committee through our internal auditors, our chief compliance officer, and our anonymous reporting procedures. The Audit Committee reviews with management, internal auditors, and our independent auditors the accounting policies, the system of internal control over financial reporting, and the quality and appropriateness of disclosure content in the financial statements or other external financial communications. It also periodically reviews, with our management and our independent auditors, management’s | ||
Nominating, Governance & Sustainability Committee | Human Capital Management & Compensation Committee | |||
|
|
| ||
| ||||
Our Nominating, Governance and |
| |||
| ||||
Our Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee oversees risks primarily associated with | ||||
Corporate Responsibility – Health, Safety, EnvironmentStockholder Engagement
We engage with our investors in a variety of ways. Our CEO and Quality (“HSEQ”)Chief Financial Officer regularly meet with investors, prospective investors, and investment analysts. These meetings are generally focused on company performance and strategy and may include other senior leaders at TETRA.
Our focus on HSEQ, an approach we call “Drive to ZERO”, is more thanBoard of Directors has a priority, it is deeply rooted as one of our core values. Emphasizing our commitment to Drive to ZERO incidents, in 2016, we reviewedwell-developed stockholder engagement program that emphasizes biannual engagement and updated our HSEQ Policy to better align our messagedirect communication with our Dedicated toboard, primarily the CØre values. Our HSEQ Policy is a concise message stating our commitment to HSEQ and outlining our cornerstone principles essential for our future success. Our HSEQ policy has been endorsed by our CEO and communicated throughout the company, and to our suppliers and customers. Below are some examplesChairman of the steps we have taken towards upholding these values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board and the Chairmen of the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee and the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee. In general, our board’s discussions with our stockholders center around the following topics:
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 25 |
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
|
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors is focused on integrating sustainability into our Company’s long-term strategy. We are committed to operating in a sustainable manner and being a responsible corporate citizen for the benefit of our customers, investors, employees, the environment and the communities in which we operate. We focus on environmental stewardship, the health and safety of our workforce, the recruitment, development and retention of our workforce, and community engagement.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a policyguidelines with regard to stock ownership for our directors and executive officers. The stock ownership guidelines provided under the policy are intended to align the interests of our directors and executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Under this policy,the guidelines, our executive officers have historically been required to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to a multiple, based upon position, of their base salary. In addition to ownership of our stock, ownership of common units of CSI Compressco by our executive officers and directors counts toward fulfillment of the ownership requirement. For purposes of this guideline:these guidelines: (1) each share of our common stock and each CSI Compressco commonor unvested restricted stock unit (“RSU”) owned on the date of our Annual Meeting each year shall beis deemed to have a value equal to the greater of (a) the trading price of a share of our common stock or a CSI Compressco LP common unit, as applicable, as of the date the applicable share or common unit was acquired or (b) the trading price of a share of our common stock or a CSI Compressco common unit as of the date of our Annual Meeting. The policy establishesguidelines establish the following minimum ownership guidelines.ownership:
Executive Officers - must own shares of our common stock and/or common units of CSI Compressco LP with a value equal to a multiple, based upon position, of their base salary. The multiples are as follows::
Under the policy,guidelines, newly electedappointed officers have five years from their date of appointment to meet the guideline.guidelines. In addition, in the event the multiple of an executive officer’s base salary is increased, the executive officer will have five years from the time of such increase to meet the new guideline. The policy has not been updated to establish a guideline for a stand-alone President position.minimum.
As of the date of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, subject to the transition periods described above, all covered officers are in compliance with the policy, with the exception of one executive officer who is not an NEO. Such executive officer received a waiver from our board for a two-year period in February 2018.guidelines.
Non-Employee Directors - including the Chairman of the Board of Directors, are required to hold shares of our common stock and/or common units of CSI Compressco having a deemed value equal to five-times their annual cash retainer. Non-employee directors have four years from the date of their election or appointment to be in compliance.meet the guidelines. As of the date of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, subject to the transition periods described above, all non-employee directors are in compliance with the policy.guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
Board Committees. The Board of Directors assigns responsibilities and delegates authority to its committees, as appropriate, and the committees regularly report on their activities to the full board. During 2017,2021, the standing committees of the Board of Directors consisted of an Audit Committee, a Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee, and a Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee. Each committee has the authority to engage outside experts, advisors, and legal counsel to assist in its work.
The following table identifies the current committee members.chairs and membership of the board and each standing board committee. As discussed above, the board has determined that each member of the Audit, Human Capital Management and Compensation, and Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committees is independent in accordance with NYSE standards.
| Committee Membership |
| |||||||
Director | Audit |
| Compensation |
| Governance |
| |||
Mark E. Baldwin(1) | C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
|
|
| C |
|
|
|
| |
Paul D. Coombs | √ |
|
|
|
| √ |
| ||
John F. Glick |
|
|
| √ |
| C |
| ||
Stephen A. Snider |
|
|
| √ |
| √ |
| ||
William D. Sullivan(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth E. White, Jr. | √ |
| √ |
|
|
|
| ||
Joseph C. Winkler III | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number of Committee Meetings held in 2017 |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 3 |
|
| Board of Directors | Committee Membership | ||
Director |
| Audit | Compensation | Governance |
Mark E. Baldwin(1) | √ | C |
|
|
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. | √ |
| C |
|
John F. Glick | √ |
| √ | C |
Gina A. Luna | √ | √ |
| √ |
Sharon B. McGee | √ |
| √ | √ |
Brady M. Murphy ** | √ |
|
|
|
William D. Sullivan(2)(3) | √ |
|
| √ |
Shawn D. Williams | √ | √ | √ |
|
Number of Meetings held in 2021 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| (1) | Designated Audit Committee Financial Expert |
| (2) | Retiring at the conclusion of the 2022 Annual Meeting |
(3) | As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Sullivan is an ex officio member of the Audit |
| C | Committee Chair |
| √ | Member |
| ** | |
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Meetings and Attendance. During 2017,2021, the Board of Directors held sevenseventeen meetings, including fiveseven regular and twoten special meetings. Each member of the Board of Directors attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board of Directors held while serving as a member of the board and the meetings of each committee of the Board of Directors ofcommittees on which he was a member that were held during the time he was a member.they served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our preference is to have our directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All members of our Board of Directors who were serving at the time of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 20172021 attended that Annual Meeting.
Audit |
|
| |||
|
| The Audit Committee’s primary purpose is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of: | |||
(i) | the integrity of our financial statements; | ||||
(ii) | our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; | ||||
(iii) | the independent auditor’s qualifications; | ||||
(iv) | the performance of our internal audit function and independent | ||||
(v) | our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including major risk exposures and steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; and | ||||
(vi) | information technology security and risk, including cybersecurity. | ||||
The Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint and terminate our independent auditors. To promote the independence of the audit, the Audit Committee consults separately with the independent auditors, the internal auditors, and management. As required by NYSE and SEC rules regarding audit committees, the Board of Directors has reviewed the qualifications of its Audit Committee and has determined that none of the current members of the Audit Committee has a relationship with us that might interfere with the exercise of their independence from us or our management, as independence is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has determined that all current members of our Audit Committee are independent as defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act and as defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. Further, our board has determined that Mr. Baldwin, the current Audit Committee chairman, is an “audit committee financial expert” within the definition established by the SEC. |
|
|
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance
Nominating, Governance and |
|
| |||
|
| The Nominating, Governance and | |||
(i) | investigates and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with regard to all matters of corporate governance, including the structure, operation, and evaluation of the board and its committees; | ||||
(ii) | investigates and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to qualified candidates to be nominated for election to the board; | ||||
(iii) | reviews and makes recommendations to the board with regard to candidates for directors properly nominated by stockholders in accordance with our | ||||
| (iv) | in consultation with the board and each of guidance with respect to material environmental, social and other sustainability matters involving our Company and (b) receives updates from management regarding our Company’s environmental, social and other sustainability activities. |
Other Committees. From time to time, the board has established special committees to oversee certain projects or issues. During 2017, a Special Committee of directors (“Special Committee”), comprised of Messrs. Baldwin (chairman of the Special Committee), Coombs, and Winkler was formed to investigate, review and evaluate award procedures under our Third Amended and Restated 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”) and awards granted to Mr. Brightman on February 22, 2017 under the 2011 Plan in response to certain claims in a letter dated March 1, 2017 from an attorney purporting to represent one of our stockholders. Following the Special Committee investigation, on August 9, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the reformation of the February 2017 award to Mr. Brightman to comply with the terms of the 2011 Plan by rescinding certain stock option awards granted in excess of the 2011 Plan limits. As previously disclosed, in replacement of the stock options that were rescinded, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of cash-settled stock appreciation rights to Mr. Brightman (see the description below under the heading “Time-Based Awards Granted under the TETRA 2011 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan during 2017”). The Special Committee met four times in 2017.
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
Board and CommitteeCommittee Succession Planning
The Nominating, Governance and Corporate Governance Committee’s ongoingSustainability Committee regularly considers the long-term make up of our Board of Directors, the experience and skills needed for our board as our business and the markets in which we do business evolve, and whether the composition appropriately aligns with our business and strategic needs. The Committee also considers succession planning processin light of anticipated retirements and for the board takes into account the importance of board refreshment and having an appropriate balance of experience and perspectives on our board and eachcommittee chair and membership roles to maintain relevant expertise and depth of its committees. The committee recognizesexperience.
As a result of this ongoing process, over the importance of continuitylast eight years we have added seven new independent directors, who bring fresh and that refreshment should not be effectuated all at once and anticipates that changes to board composition should occur gradually over several years. Beginning in 2013, the committee retained Russell Reynolds Associates, a leading executive search consulting firm, as an advisor to help the committee oversee a multi-year succession planning process that to date added four new directors to infuse new ideas and freshdiverse perspectives into our boardroom. In addition, fournine directors retired from our board during the 2014-2016 time-period2014-2021 time period and twoone will retire at the conclusion of the 2022 Annual Meeting.
Director Nominations by the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee
The Board has a robust process for the consideration of potential director candidates through which the Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee (the “Governance Committee”) establishes criteria, screens candidates, and evaluates the qualifications of persons who may be considered as nominees for director, including any candidates nominated or recommended by stockholders. The following graph illustrates our general selection process for new directors:
30 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Corporate Governance
Diversity. Although we have not adopted a separate policy with regard to the consideration of diversity when evaluating candidates for election to our board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that when assessing candidates, we will consider diversity, including gender and ethnicity. The Governance Committee believes that board membership should reflect diversity in the broadest sense, taking into account our needs and the current composition of the board. We strive to maintain a diversity of backgrounds and experience among the members of the board, as we believe this improves the quality of the board’s deliberations. The Board of Directors’ final selection of board nominees is based on merit, giving consideration to the nominee’s knowledge, experience, skills in areas deemed critical to understanding our business, and personal characteristics such as integrity and judgment, diversity, including gender diversity, ethnicity, and background, and the candidates’ other time commitments.
The following chart illustrates the tenure of the director nominees of our Board of Directors. We believe the tenure of our directors provides the appropriate balance of expertise, experience, continuity, and perspective to our board to serve the best interests of our stockholders.
Years on Board of Directors
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 31 |
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
The Compensation Committee, the CEO, and the Vice President of Human Resources evaluate, from time to time each year, executive development and succession planning to prepare us for future success. The succession planning process covers the CEO position as well as all senior management positions. This review of executive talent determines readiness to take on additional leadership roles and identifies developmental opportunities needed to prepare our executives for greater responsibilities. Our short and long-term business strategy is considered when evaluating candidates and their skills. Where possible, our board gains insight through exposure to internal succession candidates from their presentations to the board, work with individual directors or board committees, and participation in board activities. The CEO makes a formal succession planning presentation to the Compensation Committee annually in which our directors who are not members of the Compensation Committee are invited to attend.
Director Orientation and Continuing Education
We provide each new director with an orientation that consists of a series of in-person briefings provided by Senior Managementsenior management and others on our business operations, strategic plans, significant accounting and risk management issues, corporate governance, compliance, and key policies and practices. The orientation sessions are tailored to the particular director depending on their orientation needs. Each director is expected to participate in continuing educational programs as necessary to maintain expertise to perform his or her responsibilities as a director. In this regard, from time to time we provide pertinent articles and information relating to our business, financial affairs, risks, competitors, corporate governance, and changes in legal and regulatory issues. We may also coordinate training and educational sessions for directors from outside experts and provide directors with tours of our facilities from time to time. We reimburse directors for reasonable costs associated with attending other relevant director education programs.
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process
Our board recognizes the critical role that board and committee evaluations play in ensuring the effective functioning of our board. Accordingly, each year, our Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee appraises the framework for our board and committee evaluation process and oversees the evaluation process to ensure that the full board and each committee conduct an assessment of their performance and functioning and solicit feedback for enhancement and improvement..improvement.
| |
| |
Our annual board and committee evaluations cover the following topics: • Board and committee composition, including skills, background and • Review of key areas of focus for the board and effectiveness in overseeing these • Satisfaction with board performance, including the performance of the board and committee chairs in those • Board and committee information needs and quality of materials • Areas where the board and committees should increase their • Satisfaction with the board schedule, agendas, time allotted for topics, and encouragement of open communication and • Satisfaction with committee structure and • Access to management, experts, and internal and external resources
|
2021 Evaluation Process | ||
Determine Format | Conduct Evaluation | Follow-Up |
The Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee discussed and considered the approach for the 2021 evaluation process. The board and each of the committees conducted their respective self-evaluations through a discussion-based approach to enhance candid dialog and utilized a list of topics and questions to frame the discussion.
| Executive session discussions of the board and committee self-evaluations were led by our board chairman and committee chairmen, respectively. | Committee chairmen reported to the full board regarding their respective committee self-assessments, including any action items. The board chairman communicated to the CEO any requests for enhancements in process that were noted. |
Throughout the year, board and committee members also have the opportunity to provide input directly to the board chairman and/or committee chairmen or to management. |
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
Executive SessionsSessions of the Board of Directors
Our independent non-management directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting. These executive sessions are presided over by Mr. Sullivan or, in his absence, another independent non-management director. The independent non-management directors presently consist of all current directors other than Mr. Brightman.Murphy.
Our security holders and other interested parties may communicate with one or more of our directors (including the non-managementpresiding director of executive sessions and the independent non-employee directors as a group) by mail sent to our Corporate Secretary, TETRA Technologies, Inc., 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, or by email at corpsecretary@tetratec.com. Such communications should specify the intended recipient or recipients. All such communications, other than commercial solicitations or communications, will be forwarded to the appropriate director or directors.
Director Nominations Submitted by Stockholders
The Nominating, Governance and Corporate GovernanceSustainability Committee will consider proposals for nominees for director from our stockholders. In order to nominate a director at the annual meeting, our bylaws require that a stockholder follow the procedures set forth in Article III, Section 3 of our bylaws.Bylaws. (This bylawBylaw provision is available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations area of our website at www.tetratec.com.) In order to recommend a nominee for a director position, a stockholder must be a stockholder of record at the time the stockholder gives notice of the recommendation, and the stockholder must be entitled to vote for the election of directors at the meeting at which such nominee will be considered.
Stockholder recommendations must be made pursuant to written notice delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than 80 days prior to the date of the annual or special meeting at which directors are to be elected; provided, that if the date of the annual or special meeting is not publicly announced more than 90 days prior to the annual or special meeting, such notice by the stockholder will be considered timely if delivered to the Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such announcement of the date of the meeting was communicated to the stockholders. |
The stockholder notice must set forth the following:
| 1. | name and address of the stockholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; |
| 2. | a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy to nominate the person or persons specified; |
| 3. | a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons under which the nomination(s) are |
| 4. | for each person the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, all information relating to such person that would be required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of such nominees as directors pursuant to Schedule 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act; and |
| 5. | for each person nominated, a written consent to serve as a director, if elected. |
In addition to complying with the foregoing procedures, any stockholder nominating a director must also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate Governance
Director Nominations by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Board has a robust process for the consideration of potential director candidates through which the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee” ) establishes criteria, screens candidates, and evaluates the qualifications of persons that may be considered for service as a director, including candidates nominated or recommended by stockholders. The following graph illustrates our selection process for new directors:Executive Succession Planning
Diversity. Although we have not adopted a formal policy with regardThe Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee, the CEO, and the Vice President of Human Resources evaluate, from time to time each year, executive development and succession planning to prepare us for future success. The succession planning process covers the considerationCEO position as well as all senior management positions and certain other key positions. This review of diversityexecutive talent determines readiness to take on additional leadership roles and identifies developmental opportunities needed to prepare our executives for greater responsibilities. Our short and long-term business strategy is considered when evaluating candidates for election toand their skills. Where possible, our board our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that when assessinggains insight through exposure to internal succession candidates we will consider diversity, including gender diversity. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that board membership should reflect diversity in the broadest sense, and so when reviewing candidates for nominationfrom their presentations to the Board of Directors,board, work with individual directors or board committees, and participation in board activities. The CEO makes a formal succession planning presentation to the committee considers each nominee’s diversity, including gender diversity, taking into accountHuman Capital Management and Compensation Committee annually in conjunction with our needs and the current composition of the board. We strive to maintain a diversity of backgrounds and experience among theannual strategy meeting in which our directors who are not members of the board, as we believe this improves the quality of the board’s deliberations. The Board of Directors’ final selection of board nominees is based on merit, giving considerationcommittee are invited to the nominee’s knowledge, experience, skills in areas deemed critical to understanding our business, personal characteristics such as integrity and judgment, diversity, including gender, ethnicity, and background, and the candidates’ other time commitments.attend.
Insider Trading Policy (including Hedging Transactions)
We acknowledge that sales of our common stock by our executive officers will occur periodically. In particular, we believe that our executive officers who have a significant portion of their net worth in our common stock may desire to diversify their investment portfolios over time and may be required to sell our common stock to finance stock option exercises and to pay related taxes. We have established a policy for trading in our common stock. This policy is designed to help ensure compliance with federal securities laws and allow the anticipated periodic sales to
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
occur in an orderly fashion.
Hedging Transactions. The trading policy also prohibits our directors, officers, and employees from engaging in short sales of our common stock, from buying or selling puts, calls or other derivative instruments involving our common stock, and from engaging in certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions involving our common stock. An exception to this prohibition may be granted where an officer, director or employee wishes to pledge our securities as collateral for a loan (not including margin debt) and clearly demonstrates the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities. Any director, officer or employee who wishes to pledge our securities as collateral for a loan must submit a request for approval to our General Counsel at least two weeks prior to the proposed execution of documents evidencing the proposed pledge.
Related Person Transaction Policy. The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, has adopted the Policy and Procedures with respect to Related Person Transactions (the “Policy”), for the review and approval of certain related person transactions. The Policy covers transactions in which (i) we, or any subsidiary of ours, are a participant, (ii) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $100,000, and (iii) any related party (generally, directors and executive officers, and their immediate family members, and 5% stockholders) has a direct or indirect material interest. The Policy generally requires that such transactions be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Under the Policy, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances available to the committee and will approve such transactions only if they are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. In the event a transaction is not identified as a related person transaction in advance, it will be submitted to the Audit Committee, which will evaluate the transaction, including ratification or rescission of the transaction, and possible disciplinary action.
Transactions with Related Persons. Shawn L. Shoemake, the spouse of Alicia P. Boston, our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, has been an employee of the Company since July 2009. Mr. Shoemake received total compensation of approximately $143,375 for his services for the year ended December 31, 2021.
We have determined that there are no other material transactions involving a director or any other related person that require disclosure.disclosure
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017,2021 regarding compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.
34 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Corporate Governance
Plan Category |
| Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options |
|
| Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options |
|
| Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Comp. Plans (Excluding Securities Shown in the First Column) |
| Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1) |
|
| Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (2) |
|
| Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Shown in the First Column) |
| ||||||
Equity compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
2007 Long Term Incentive |
|
| 2,031,529 |
|
| $ | 10.23 |
|
|
| — |
|
| 541,435 |
|
| $ | 6.79 |
|
|
| — |
|
2011 Long Term Incentive(2) |
|
| 3,615,389 |
|
| $ | 6.91 |
|
|
| 1,577,164 |
| |||||||||||
2011 Long Term Incentive |
| 2,346,668 |
|
| $ | 6.35 |
|
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
2018 Long Term Incentive (4) |
| 3,607,635 |
|
| $ | 4.19 |
|
|
| 5,661,917 |
| ||||||||||||
Total |
|
| 5,646,918 |
|
| $ | 8.10 |
|
|
| 1,577,164 |
|
| 6,495,738 |
|
| $ | 6.42 |
|
|
| 5,661,917 |
|
Equity compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
not approved by stockholders(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Equity compensation plans not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
approved by stockholders(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Serrano Plan |
|
| 79,051 |
|
| $ | 6.60 |
|
|
| — |
|
| 79,051 |
|
| $ | 6.60 |
|
|
| — |
|
2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 76,495 |
| ||||||||||||
Total |
|
| 79,051 |
|
| $ | 6.60 |
|
|
| — |
|
| 79,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76,495 |
|
All Plans(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total |
|
| 5,725,969 |
|
| $ | 8.00 |
|
|
| 1,577,164 |
| |||||||||||
All Plans Total |
| 6,574,789 |
|
| $ | 6.42 |
|
|
| 5,738,412 |
|
|
|
(2) | Represents weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding under the 2007 Plan, 2011 Plan and 2018 Plan. See note 1 above with respect to RSUs granted under the 2018 Plan. The weighted-average exercise price does not take these awards into account. |
(3) | Consists of the 2007 Plan, the 2011 Plan and the 2018 Plan. |
(4) | Under the |
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
| Consists of the award granted to Mr. Serrano in connection with his initial employment and the 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan. A description of each of these plans follows. |
|
|
Non-Stockholder Approved Plans
Serrano
Serrano Plan
On August 1, 2012, Elijio V. Serrano was appointed by our Board of Directors to the positions of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In connection with Mr. Serrano’s appointment, the Board of Directors authorized the grant to Mr. Serrano of an employment inducement award of 79,051 nonqualified stock options and 46,898 shares of restricted stock to be effective as of August 15, 2012. The exercise price of the nonqualified stock options is $6.60, which is equal to the closing price per share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on August 15, 2012. Subject to Mr. Serrano’s continued employment and other terms and conditions set forth the in the Employee Equity Award Agreement between us and Mr. Serrano, theThe nonqualified stock options vested 33.3334% on the first anniversary date of the award, continued to vest an additional 2.7778% each month, and becameare fully vested onand the third anniversary date of the award. The award will expire on August 12, 2022.15, 2022 and the restricted shares fully vested on August 15, 2015.
2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan
The TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan was adopted effective as of February 12, 2018 and accordingly it is not reflected in the table above.2018. The purpose of the plan is to attract and retain the best available individuals for positions of substantial responsibility by providing a material inducement for such individuals to enter into employment with us or any of our affiliates. In connection with the employment of Brady M. Murphy, currently our new President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer, the Board of Directors authorized the grant to Mr. Murphy of an employment inducement award of 502,513 shares of restricted stock, effective as of February 12, 2018. Subject to Mr. Murphy’s continued employment with us and other terms and conditions set forth in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement between us and Mr. Murphy,Fifty percent of the shares of restricted stock will vest 50%vested on the one-year anniversary date of the grant, 25% vested on the second-year anniversary date of the grant, and the remaining 25% on each of the second andshares of restricted stock vested on the third-year anniversariesanniversary of the date of grant. In addition, in connection with our acquisition of Swiftwater Energy Services, LLC, the Board of Directors authorized the grant of awards totaling 420,992 shares of restricted common stock to thirteen persons as an inducement to their employment with TETRA on February 28, 2018. Subject to their continued employment with us and other terms and conditions set forth in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement between us and each of the individuals, the
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 35 |
Corporate Governance
shares of restricted stock will vestvested 100% on the third-year anniversary of the date of grant. There are 76,495 shares available for future awards under the 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting, internal controls, and audit functions on behalf of the Board of Directors. Our management has the primary responsibility for preparing our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and assessing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We have a full-time internal audit department that reports to the Audit Committee. This department is responsible for the evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the organizations’ governance, risk management, and internal controls as well as carrying out assigned responsibilities to achieve the organizations’ stated goals and objectives.
Our independent registered public accountants, Ernst & Young,Grant Thornton LLP, or E&Y,GT, are responsible for auditing our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or PCAOB, and issuing their reports based on that audit. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements and schedule for the year ended December 31, 20172021 that are included in our Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with our management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
Ernst & Young LLP was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, and the first quarter of 2020. On June 12, 2020, the Audit Committee approved the dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as our registered public accounting firm. On June 15, 2020, management notified Ernst & Young that it would be dismissed as our independent registered public accounting firm effective immediately. The audit reports of Ernst & Young on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and through June 12, 2020, there were no (a) disagreements (as that term is used in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with Ernst & Young on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter in their reports; or (b) reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K). As reported in our 8-K filed June 18, 2020, the Audit Committee selected GT to be the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020.
The Audit Committee is comprised of fourthree non-employee independent directors and is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is reviewed by the committee annually and was last amended on December 18, 201513, 2021. The charter is available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations area of our website at www.tetratec.com. Under the charter, the primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities as to, among other duties: (1) the integrity of our financial statements, including a review of the application of accounting principles, significant financial reporting issues and judgments in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, and the effects of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the financial statements; (2) reviewing and discussing with management and our independent registered public accountants our earnings press releases, as well as public earnings guidance; (3) recommending to the Boardboard the filing of our audited financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (4) our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, including review of any material issues as to the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting; (5) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our Code of Business Conduct;Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers; (6) the performance of our internal audit function; (7) the performance of our compliance function; (8) our enterprise risk management process; (9) our information technology security and (9)risk, including cybersecurity, and (10) the evaluation, appointment and retention of our independent registered public accountants, including a review of the firm's qualifications, services, independence, fees and performance.
In connection with the evaluation, appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accountants, each year the Audit Committee reviews and evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent registered public accountants and lead audit partner, including taking into account the opinions of management and our internal auditor. In doing so, the Audit Committee
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 37 |
Audit Committee Report
considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: quality of services provided; sufficiency of firm resources,resources; technical expertise and knowledge of the industry; quality of communication and interaction with the firm; known significant legal or regulatory proceedings related to the firm; external data on audit quality and performance, including PCAOB reports; independence; objectivity; and professional skepticism. The Audit Committee also considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.
Further, the Audit Committee reviews in advance and pre-approves, explicitly,specifically, audit and permissible non-audit services provided to us by E&Y.GT. For more information regarding the Audit Committee’s preapproval procedures, please read “Audit Committee Preapproval Policies and Procedures” below.
The Audit Committee has also established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment, on a confidential basis, of any complaints related to accounting or compliance matters we receive. We encourage employees and third-party individuals and organizations to report concerns about our accounting controls, auditing matters, or anything else that appears to involve financial or other wrongdoing through one of the methods described in our Whistleblower Policy which is available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations area of our website at www.tetratec.com.
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
As discussed more fully in Proposal No. 2 on page 812 of the Proxy Statement, the Audit Committee and Boardboard believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to continue the retention of E&YGT to serve as our independent registered public accountants. TheAccordingly, the Audit Committee has continued retention of E&YGT as the Company’s independent auditor for 2018. E&Y2022. GT has been the independent auditor for the Company since 1981.June 2020. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accountants, the Audit Committee will continue to recommend that the Boardboard request the stockholders, at the Annual Meeting, to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accountants.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent and possesses the necessary level of financial literacy required to enable him or her to effectively serve as an Audit Committee member and that our Audit Committee Chairman qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert. There were five meetings of the Audit Committee during the year ended December 31, 2017.2021. The meetings of the Audit Committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the committee,members of the Audit Committee, management of the Company, our internal audit function, and E&Y.GT.
In connection with the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements and schedule included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, the Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and E&YGT the overall scope and plansplan for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal auditors and E&Y,GT, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal control,controls, including internal control over financial reporting, critical audit matters addressed during the audit, and the overall quality of our financial reporting.
The Audit Committee reviewed with E&Y,GT, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements and schedule with US generally accepted accounting principles, E&Y’sGT’s judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the committee by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB, including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, the rules of the SEC, and other applicable regulations. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with E&YGT their independence from our management and the Company, including the matters contained in the letter from E&YGT required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services performed by E&YGT with E&Y’sGT’s independence.
The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed together with management and E&YGT our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, and the results of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and E&Y’sGT’s audit of internal control over financial reporting.
Over the course of a year, the Audit Committee has a rolling agenda covering a variety of standing matters such as briefings from the Internal Auditor on TETRA’s enterprise risk management program, it’s internal control system and on the outcomes of internal audits and notable control matters, briefings from the Chief Compliance Officer, tax matters, and information technology management and security. In 2021, in addition to the standing matters, members of management, the internal auditor, and the independent auditors also made presentations to the Audit Committee throughout the year on specific topics of interest, including our (i) enterprisecyber security risk managementassessment and risk
38 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
Audit Committee Report
mitigation strategies; (ii) financial reporting for assets held for sale and discontinued operations; (iii) TETRA’s net operating loss carryforward position; (iv) an overview of international financial statements and tax audits; and (v) TETRA’s global cash repatriation process (ii) business continuity plans, (iii) information technology systems and controls, (iv) cybersecurity, (v) strategy and management of the implementation of new systems, (vi) critical accounting policies, (vii) income tax strategy, and (viii) business insurance program..
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that our audited consolidated financial statements and schedule be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2021, filed by the Company with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,
Mark E. Baldwin, Chairman
PaulGina A. Luna
Shawn D. CoombsWilliams
Kenneth E. White, Jr.
Joseph C. Winkler III
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
This report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically request that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act. Further, this report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference.
Fees Paid to Principal Accounting Firm
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us by our principal accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017,2021, and 2016,2020, respectively:
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2021 |
|
| 2020 |
| ||||
Audit fees |
| $ | 1,605,000 |
|
| $ | 1,984,000 |
|
| $ | 925,000 |
|
| $ | 1,111,000 |
|
Audit related fees |
|
| 65,000 |
|
|
| 67,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Tax fees(2) |
|
| 35,000 |
|
|
| 9,000 |
|
|
| 7,000 |
|
| $ | 7,500 |
|
All other fees |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Total fees |
| $ | 1,705,000 |
|
| $ | 2,060,000 |
|
| $ | 932,000 |
|
| $ | 1,118,500 |
|
(1) |
|
(2) | Consists solely of fees for |
|
|
The Audit Committee preapproved 100% of these fees shown in the above table. Before approving these fees, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of services by Ernst & Young LLPour principal accounting firm that are not related to the audit of our financial statements was compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP,our principal accounting firm, and the Audit Committee concluded that it was.
Audit Committee Preapproval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy with respect to the services that may be performed by our independent registered public accounting firmauditors (the “Audit Firm”). This policy provides that all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the Audit Firm must be specifically pre-approved on a case-by-case basis by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions made by such member(s) to the entire Audit Committee at or before its next scheduled meeting. As of the date hereof, the Audit Committee has delegated this authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Neither the Audit Committee, nor the person to whom pre-approval authority is delegated, may delegate to management their responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the Audit Firm.
All requests or applications by the Audit Firm to provide services to us must be submitted to the Audit Committee or its chairman by both the Audit Firm and the Chief Financial Officer and must include a description of the services being requested for pre-approval and a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating to auditor independence.
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTEXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our current executive officers and their ages and positions are as follows:
Name |
| Age |
| Position |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| President and Chief | |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
| ||
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
| Senior Vice President |
|
|
|
| Senior Vice President - |
|
|
| General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer | |
Richard D. O'Brien | 46 |
| Vice President - | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Vice President - Finance and Treasurer |
(Information regarding the business experience of Mr. BrightmanMurphy is set forth above under “Nominees for Director.”)
Brady M. Murphy has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since February 2018. Prior to joining TETRA, Mr. Murphy served as chief executive officer of Paradigm Group B.V., a private company focused on strategic technologies for the upstream energy industry, from January 2016 until February 2018. Mr. Murphy previously served at Halliburton Company and its affiliated companies for 26 years and held numerous international and North America positions, most recently as senior vice president - global business development and marketing from 2012 to December 2015, as senior vice president - business development Eastern Hemisphere from 2011 to 2012, and as senior vice president - Europe/Sub –Saharan Africa region from 2008 to 2011. Earlier in his career, from 1981 until 1989, Mr. Murphy held several positions with increasing responsibility at Gerhart Industries. Mr. Murphy received his B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University and is an alumnus of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.
Elijio V. Serrano has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2012. Mr. Serrano served as chief financial officer of UniversalPegasus International, a global project management, engineering and construction management company, from October 2009 through July 2012. Following his resignation from Paradigm BV in February 2009 and until his acceptance of the position with UniversalPegasus International in October 2009, Mr. Serrano was retired. From February 2006 through February 2009, Mr. Serrano served as chief financial officer and executive vice president of Paradigm BV (formerly, Paradigm Geophysical Ltd.), a provider of enterprise software solutions to the oil and gas industry. From October 1999 through February 2006, Mr. Serrano served as chief financial officer of EGL, Inc., a publicly-traded transportation and logistics company subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. From 1982 through October 1999, Mr. Serrano was employed in various capacities by Schlumberger Ltd., including as vice president and general manager of the western hemisphere operations of Schlumberger’s Geco-Prakla seismic division (from 1997 to 1999), as group controller for the global operations of the Geco-Prakla seismic division (from 1996 to 1997), and from 1992 to 1996, as controller of various geographical units of the Geco-Prakla seismic division. Mr. Serrano served as a director, chairman of the audit committee, and as a member of the corporate governance and nominating committee of Tesco Corporation, a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, until its acquisition by Nabors Industries Ltd. in December 2017. Mr. Serrano received his B.B.A. degree in Accounting and Finance from the University of Texas at El Paso. Mr. Serrano was a certified public accountant in the State of Texas from 1986 until March 2002, at which time his license became inactive.
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. has served as our General Counsel since 1994 and as a Senior Vice President since May 2011. Mr. Wallace served as our Corporate Secretary from 1996 until May 2013. From 1984 to 1994 he was engaged in the private practice of law. Mr. Wallace received his B.A. degree in Economics from the University of Virginia and his J.D. degree from the University of Texas School of Law.
|
|
|
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Matthew J. Sanderson has served as Senior Vice President with responsibility for our Energy Services Group since December 2016. Prior to joining TETRA, Mr. Sanderson most recently served as Regional Vice President - U.S. West at Schlumberger from October 2015 to November 2016. Mr. Sanderson started his career as a Field Engineer at Schlumberger in 1997 and held various engineering and managerial roles with increasing responsibility, including Vice President Wireline Production Services from December 2014 to September 2015 and QHSE Manager from October 2012 to November 2014. As Senior Vice President at TETRA, Mr. Sanderson also has primary responsibility for the Production Testing and Fluids engineering groups in addition to his managerial responsibilities at TETRA. He earned a Bachelor of Applied Science in Civil Engineering from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada and a Master's of Science in Oil & Gas Industry Management from Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Owen Serjeant has served as President and a director of our subsidiary, CSI Compressco GP Inc., the general partner of CSI Compressco LP, since November 2017. Mr. Serjeant served as Group Vice President – Global Operational Support of Schlumberger Limited, a publicly traded company subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, from April 2016 to November 2017. From July 1999 until April 2016, Mr. Serjeant served in various senior operations management roles with increasing responsibility, including most recently as Corporate Vice President – Global Operational Excellence and Group Vice President - Compression Systems Division, at Cameron International Corporation, a publicly traded company prior to its acquisition by Schlumberger in April 2016. Mr. Serjeant began his career with Cooper Energy Services and served in a variety of operations, engineering, marketing, and sales roles from 1981 to 1999. He earned his BSc degree in Mechanical Engineering from Aston University, United Kingdom, and his MBA degree from Henley Management College, United Kingdom.
Ben C. Chambers has served as our Vice President - Accounting and Controller since May 2001. He served as Chief Accounting Officer from May 2000 to May 2001. He was first employed by us in 1993, and served as Controller of our Oil & Gas Services Division from January 1995 to May 2000. From 1979 to 1992, Mr. Chambers held various management positions with Baker Hughes, Inc., ultimately serving as controller for its Tubular Services Division. Mr. Chambers received his B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of Oklahoma, and he is a certified public accountant.
Elisabeth K. Evans has served as our Vice President - Human Resources since January 2013. Ms. Evans served as senior vice president of human resources and corporate communications of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, a midstream master limited partnership that provides transportation, storage, gathering, and processing of natural gas and liquids, from February 2009 through September 2012. Following her departure from Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP and until her acceptance of the position with us in January 2013, Ms. Evans was engaged in independent consulting on human resources issues. From April 2003 through January 2009, Ms. Evans served as vice president of human resources and administrative services for AGL Resources Inc., and from 1999 through 2001, she served as a global human resources director for Accenture, Ltd. Ms. Evans was employed in various capacities by ARAMARK Corporation, including as human resources director, from 1994 through 1999. From 1988 through 1994, Ms. Evans served in human resources positions with BP. Ms. Evans received her B.A. and M.A. degrees in Economics from Indiana University.
Joseph J. Meyer has served as our Vice President - Finance and Treasurer since February 2015. He served as treasurer of JBT Corporation, a multi-national equipment and technology solutions provider to the food processing and air transportation industries, from July 2008 through May 2014. From June 2014 until January 2015, Mr. Meyer was self-employed. From June 2001 until July 2008, Mr. Meyer served as director, treasury operations of FMC Technologies, Inc., a multi-national company within the oil and gas equipment and services industry, food processing equipment industry, and air transportation equipment industry, and from 1995 until 2001 served in various managerial roles within the treasury department of FMC Corporation. From 1988 through 1994, Mr. Meyer held positons with increasing responsibility with several national banks. Mr. Meyer received his B.S. degree in Finance from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and his MS in Management from Northwestern University.EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Timothy C. Moeller has served as our Senior Vice President of Global Supply Chain and Chemicals since May 2020 and served as Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer from April 2018 to May 2020. Prior to joining TETRA, from September 2012 until March 2018, Mr. Moeller served as Chief Operating Officer of Melior Innovations and Chief Executive Officer of TessaFrac. From May 2006 until February 2012, Mr. Moeller held numerous Supply Chain management positions with increasing responsibility at Halliburton. Earlier in his career, Mr. Moeller held several supply chain management positions with Tyco International and YPF/Maxus Corporation. Mr. Moeller received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Texas A&M University. | ||
Alicia P. Boston has served as our General Counsel since August 2021 and has served as our Chief Compliance Officer since August 2020. Ms. Boston leads the global legal and compliance functions for our domestic and international operations and has oversight of all aspects of legal affairs, compliance and ethics. She has 25 years of combined legal experience in corporate law, contracts, strategic commercial transactions and managing litigation. From July 2009 to August 2021, she served in various in-house counsel roles in our legal department, including as assistant general counsel where she managed a broad range of legal matters with increasing responsibility. Prior to joining TETRA, Ms. Boston practiced law at private law firms in corporate and securities roles, including at Jackson Walker LLP (an Am Law 200 law firm) and other private law firms. In addition, Ms. Boston has also worked as in-house corporate legal counsel at TOTAL Petrochemicals USA, a corporate subsidiary of publicly-traded TOTAL S.A. Ms. Boston holds a Juris Doctor with honors from Texas Southern University and BBA in International Business from The University of Texas at Austin. She has been a member of the State Bar of Texas since 1997. | ||
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is designed to provide our stockholders with an understanding of our compensation philosophy and objectives and insight into the process by which our specific compensation practices are established and specific compensation decisions are made. Although the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”) is responsible for the oversight of all of our compensation programs, many of which apply to a broad-base of our employees, this CD&A focuses on the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) and other employees designated as our senior officers (together with our NEOs, “Senior Management”).
|
Company Operations and Performance
We are a geographically diversified oil and gas services company, focused on completion fluids and associated products and services, comprehensive water management solutions, frac flowback, production well testing, offshore rig cooling, and compression services and equipment. TETRA owns an equity interest, including all of the general partner interest, in CSI Compressco LP (NASDAQ: CCLP), a master limited partnership.
Our 2017 financial results reflect the improvement of oil and natural gas commodity prices during 2017 that spurred increased industry drilling and completion activity and resulted in improved demand for many of our products and services compared to 2016. Compared to 2016, our 2017 revenues increased 18.1%, and our 2017 gross profit increased 94.1%, despite the impact of continued pricing pressure in the gradually recovering market for oil and gas services.
| Richard O’Brien has served as our Vice President of Finance and Global Controller since March 25, 2019 and as Assistant Treasurer since May 3, 2019. Mr. O’Brien served in several senior finance positions with increasing responsibilities with BHP Petroleum from October 2002 until he joined TETRA. He served as Head of Separation of BHP’s shale business from June 2018 until March 2019 and prior to that as Head of Finance from July 2014 until May 2018. He also served as Operations Accounting Controller from December 2012 until July 2014. Mr. O’Brien received his B.A. degree in English Literature from Cardiff University in Cardiff, Wales, and is a Chartered Accountant and a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. | |
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
The gradual recovery that began in 2017 has increased competition for labor, including executive talent. As we enter 2018, we are mindful of the need to retain key members of Senior Management who are critical to the execution of our long-term growth strategies.
Consideration of Prior Year's Advisory Vote & Stockholder Outreach
During 2016, the chairman of our Committee conducted significant stockholder outreach to ensure the perspectives and feedback of our larger institutional stockholders were heard and well understood. We contacted stockholders who owned approximately 72% of our then outstanding common stock and requested an opportunity to have calls or in-person meetings with them. Stockholders who owned approximately 30% of our then outstanding common stock accepted the Committee's offer and participated in calls and in-person meetings with our Committee chairman and members of senior management from our human resources and legal departments. Their comments were summarized and discussed with both the Committee and our Board of Directors. During the engagement, stockholders were generally supportive of our compensation programs.
This support was reflected in the results of our “say-on-pay” resolution in May 2017, with approximately 99% of stockholder votes cast in favor of the resolution (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes). Following our 2017 Annual Meeting, as we considered the specific compensation practices through which we implement our compensation philosophy, we were mindful of the very strong support that our stockholders expressed for our 2016 executive compensation policies and practices. We made no significant changes to our compensation practices as a result of the 2017 say-on-pay vote.
Impact of Industry Cyclicality on Compensation
The unprecedented and lengthy downturn experienced by the oil and gas service industry required us to take certain cost reduction actions during 2015 and 2016, including reductions of several elements of Senior Management compensation. As we moved through 2017 and began to see signs of a recovery for the industry, we were able to reverse those reductions and effectively return most elements of the compensation of Senior Management to pre-downturn (2014) levels. In the latter half of 2017 and entering 2018, we are cognizant of the fact that our Senior Management compensation will require adjustment during 2018 in order to retain talent in the recovering market, which is characterized by a highly competitive labor market, particularly in certain geographic areas in which we operate.
|
| Jacek M. Mucha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
2021 CD&A At-A-Glance This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) reviews the objectives and elements of our executive compensation program and discusses the 2021 compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer and the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) and other employees designated as our senior officers (together with our NEOs, “Senior Management”). It also explains the decision-making process of our Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”) and actions the Committee took during 2021 based on its ongoing commitments to solicit and consider stockholder feedback regarding our compensation program for our Senior Management and to ensure that we continue to execute our long-term strategies and achieve sustainable growth in returns for our stockholders. During 2021, we: | |||
Successfully executed a key long-term strategy driving a significant improvement in the market price for our stock. | |||
Decreased the annual salary and increased the annual performance-based cash incentive target of our CEO and CFO, placing a larger portion of their target total direct compensation at risk. | |||
Reinstated base pay to pre-pandemic levels for NEOs other than our CEO and CFO. | |||
We refer to certain non-GAAP measures that are used in our compensation decisions throughout this CD&A. Please refer to Appendix A of this Proxy Statement for information regarding these measures. |
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
Company Operations and Performance
We are an industrial and oil & gas products and services company operating on six continents focused on bromine-based completion fluids, calcium chloride, water management solutions, frac flowback and production well testing services. Calcium chloride is used in the oil and gas, industrial, agricultural, road, food and beverage markets. We are evolving our business model by expanding into the low carbon energy markets with our chemistry expertise, key mineral acreage and global infrastructure. Recently announced initiatives include commercialization of TETRA PureFlow® an ultra-pure zinc bromide for stationary batteries and energy storage; advancing an innovative carbon capture utilization and storage technology with CarbonFree to capture CO2 and mineralize emissions to make commercial, carbon-negative chemicals; and development of our lithium and bromine mineral acreage to meet the growing demand for oil and gas products and energy storage.
In January of 2021, we divested our interests in CSI Compressco LP for over $30 million of cash proceeds, simplifying our capital structure and unlocking significant stockholder value, and announced several initiatives to leverage our chemistry expertise and resources around carbon capture and energy storage. These initiatives reflect our continued focus on sustainability and the environment, and present growth opportunities beyond our historic oil, gas, and industrial applications. By the end of 2021, our two ongoing business segments, Completion Fluids & Products and Water & Flowback Services, were rapidly approaching pre-pandemic performance levels well ahead of pre-pandemic industry activity levels.
42 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Positive 2021 Say-on-Pay Vote Outcome and Stockholder Engagement
In 2021, we received approximately 96% stockholder support on our say-on-pay advisory vote. We maintain an ongoing, proactive outreach effort with our stockholders. Our board has a practice of periodically engaging with stockholders to seek feedback on our executive compensation program. We appreciate that our stockholders take the time to have a candid dialog with us and provide us with meaningful feedback. Although each stockholder’s particular focus is slightly different, our pay for performance approach to executive compensation, emphasis on social responsibility, and human capital management have been well received. The feedback we receive from future stockholder outreach efforts will be considered in our assessment of any changes in our compensation programs. We are pleased with our say-on-pay results and stockholder feedback and will continue to engage with our stockholders to be sure we understand their perspectives. For a discussion of our stockholder engagement efforts on topics such as corporate governance and sustainability, please see page 23 in this Proxy Statement.
Overall CompensationCompensation Structure
We seek to structure a balance between achieving positive short-term annual results and ensuring long- term viability and success by providing both annual and long-term incentive opportunities. The following graphic illustrates the components of the total compensation opportunities available to members of our Senior Management:
Alignment of Pay with Stock Price Performance
A significant portion of our NEOs’ total compensation is in the form of long-term incentive awards that are tied to the long-term performance of our stock and certain key measures that drive stockholder returns. The process by which the Committee determines the structure of our NEOs’ long-term incentive awards takes into account TETRA’s stock price performance, its financial performance relative to our peers and internal budgeted expectations, market compensation and the need to retain executive talent over the long-term, and alignment with the returns generated for our stockholders.
To demonstrate this tie to performance, the table below detailsexplains the differences between Total Direct Compensation as presented in the Summary Compensation Table, Target Total Direct Compensation as approved by the Committee (that is, the total compensation opportunity), and current potential RealizableRealized Compensation (that is, the current value of the compensation as of December 31 of a given year, which reflects the performance level of our CEO, Mr. Brightman)Murphy). The table and accompanying graphsgraph represent supplemental information that is not intended to be a substitute for the information provided in the Summary Compensation Table on page 71,59, which has been prepared in accordance with the SEC’s disclosure rules.
Compensation | Components Included | ||||
Base Salary | Annual Performance- Based Cash | Long-Term Performance- Based Cash | Time-Based Equity | ||
|
| ||||
Summary Compensation Table: Total Direct Compensation | Actual Salary | Actual cash award earned based on annual performance | Actual portion of long-term cash incentive earned based on completed |
| Grant date value of awards made during the year |
Target Total Direct Compensation |
| Target annual cash | Target long-term cash |
|
| ||
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 43 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Compensation | Components Included | ||||
Base Salary | Annual Performance- Based Cash | Long-Term Performance- Based Cash | Time-Based Equity | ||
Realizable Compensation |
| Actual cash award earned based on annual performance | Actual portion of long-term cash incentive earned based on completed |
|
|
(1) This component refers to the long-term performance-based cash incentive award granted in 2015 for the January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 performance period that was paid, to the extent earned, in March 2018.
The graph below shows the "Realizable Compensation" of our CEO, Mr. Brightman's "realizable total compensation"Murphy in 2019, 2020, and 2021 in contrast to the original Target Total Direct Compensation opportunity for compensation awarded in 2015, 2016,2019, 2020, and 20172021. Additionally, the graph shows our indexed Total Stockholder Returns (TSR) as of the end of each year as well as the indexed median TSR of our one-year total stockholder returns (TSR) for 2015, 2016,Compensation Peer Group and 2017.the indexed TSR of the Philadelphia Oilfield Service Index (OSX), a modified market weighted index composed of companies involved in the oil services sector, as of the end of each year. As illustrated by the chart below,graph, changes in our CEO's realizable total compensation hasRealized Compensation have been well-alignedvery reflective of the gains and losses of a hypothetical stockholder who invested in our common stock at the end of 2018. Further, our indexed TSR is closely aligned with stockholder returns over the three- years endedindexed TSRs of our Compensation Peer Group and the OSX through 2020, but we significantly outperform both the Compensation Peer Group and OSX in 2021.
In 2019 and 2020, the material deficit in Realizable Compensation compared to Target Total Direct Compensation is largely attributable to decreases in the market price for our common stock, which reduces (in the case of restricted stock units (RSUs)) the intended (target) value of equity awards. During 2021, this deficit was considerably smaller due to the exceptional growth in the market price for our common stock during 2021.
(1) $100 invested in TTI common stock, our Compensation Peer Group, and the Philadelphia OSX on December 31, 2017, due in large part to the significant portion2018, including reinvestment of his pay that is comprised of equity awards.
dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
Key Compensation Practices and Policies
We have implemented and continue to maintain compensation practices and policies that we believe contribute to good governance.
What We Do | What We Don’t Do |
✓ Tie a significant portion of our pay to performance through objective performance measures ✓ ✓ ✓ Retain an independent compensation consultant that does not provide any services to management ✓ Ensure a fully independent Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee ✓ Have established procedures for granting of equity awards ✓ Beginning in 2020, utilize a returns-based performance metric in long-term incentive awards granted to our executive officers ✓Annually review pay and performance alignment, including S.M.A.R.T.(1) goals for our | X Enter into employment agreements with fixed terms with our officers X Guarantee annual salary increases or bonuses X Allow short sales, transactions involving derivatives of our stock, or X Reload, reprice, or back-date stock options X Grant stock options with an exercise price less than fair market value X Provide tax gross-ups or significant executive perquisites X X Have a poison pill X For long-term performance-based cash awards granted in and after 2020, we do not pay awards based on relative TSR in excess of target amounts if our absolute TSR is negative |
(1) Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound
(1) | ||
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
In order to recruit and retain highly qualified and competent individuals as Senior Management, we
We strive to maintain a compensation program that is competitive in the labor markets in which we operate. Our guiding philosophy is to maintain an executive compensation program that will attract, retain, motivate, reward, and rewardalign highly qualified and talented individuals to enable us to perform better than our competitors. The following are our key objectives in setting the compensation programs for our Senior Management:
designcompetitivetotalcompensationprogramsthatenhanceourabilitytoattractandretain knowledgeable and experienced SeniorManagement;
Attract | Retain | Motivate | Reward | Align | ||||||
Structure pay programs and compensation levels that reflect competitive market practices in relevant markets, taking into consideration pay practices of our relevant peer group. | Provide long-term equity and cash compensation opportunities that are consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and drive individual and organizational performance. | Motivate Senior Management to deliver outstanding financial and operational results by establishing performance objectives that incentivize exceptional individual and team effort. | Provide a significant percentage of total compensation that is “at-risk” or “variable,” based on achievable performance measures that are challenging and meaningful to our long-term strategic goals. | Ensure that a significant portion of total compensation is determined by increases in stockholder value, thus assuring alignment of Senior Management and our stockholders’ interests. | ||||||
motivateourSeniorManagementtodeliveroutstandingfinancialperformanceandmeetorexceed generalandspecificbusiness,operational,andindividualperformanceobjectives;
establishsalaryandannualcashincentivecompensationlevelsthatreflectcompetitivemarketpractices inrelevantmarkets,takingintoconsiderationcompensationpracticesfortherelevantpeergroup;
provideequityincentivecompensationandlong-termcashincentivecompensationopportunitiesthatare consistent with our overall compensationphilosophy;
provideasignificantpercentageoftotalcompensationthatis“atrisk,”or“variable,”basedon predeterminedperformancemeasuresandobjectives;and
ensure that a significant portion of the total compensation package is determined by increases in stockholdervalue,thusassuringanalignmentofSeniorManagementandourstockholders’interests.
Focus on Performance-Based Pay
In establishing target compensation levels, the Committee places a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation “at-risk” through the use of variable compensation, much of which is performance-based. VariableHistorically, variable pay includeshas included the following:
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive. Performance-based cash incentives based on achievement of specific annual performance objectives.
|
|
Long-term Cash Incentive. Performance-based long-term cash based on achievement of specific long-term financial and other performance objectives. Awards of long-term performance-based cash provide the same retention value as awards of long-term equity and allow us to conserve stockholder approved awards under our equity plans.
|
|
RSUs. Shares of TETRA restricted stock units (RSUs) that vest over time and have value based on the market price of TETRA stock at the time of vesting.
|
|
Phantom Units. Prior to our divestiture of CSI Compressco in January of 2021, CCLP units that vest over time and create value based on the price of CCLP common units at the time of vesting.
By weightingBeginning in 2020, based in part on feedback from our NEOs’stockholders, we revised the structure of our long-term incentive awards to provide more direct emphasis on financial performance metrics that incentivize Senior Management to focus on creation of long-term, sustainable stockholder value.
In addition, beginning with the long-term performance-based cash awards granted in 2020, a cap of 100% of the target compensation toward variable pay, we ensure that itaward amount is aligned with company performance, particularlyimposed on any payment of awards based on relative TSR if our absolute TSR over the long term. 3-year performance period is negative.
For 2017,2021, approximately 84% of the target compensation opportunities for our CEO and 67%69% of the target compensation opportunities for our other NEOs were variable or “at-risk”, as illustrated in the following pie charts.
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
| |
CEO | Other NEOs |
■ Long Term Performance-Based Incentive (1) | ■ Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive □ Long-Term Time-Vesting Incentive (2) |
(1) Awards of long-term performance-based cash for our CEO and other NEOs. (2) Awards of TETRA RSUs for our CEO and other NEOs. |
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 45 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Role of Committee. The Committee determines our overall compensation philosophy, sets the compensation of our CEO, approves the compensation of our NEOs, and oversees the compensation of the other members of Senior Management. In making compensation decisions, the Committee considers all of the following factors:
our financial and operational results;
our strategic goals and accomplishments;
alignment of compensation opportunities with the interests of our stockholders;
the performance and potential of our CEO and other members of Senior Management;
compensation paid by companies in our compensation peer group;
compensation data from available industry surveysoftheoilfieldservicesindustry for executive officers with similar positions and with roles and responsibilities similar to our Senior Management;
market data and analysis and recommendations provided by any compensation consultant engaged by the Committee;
overall compensation paid to our CEO and members of Senior Management in previous years, including the value of equity-based compensation;
the recommendations of our CEO with respect to specific compensation matters, including changes in compensation for our Senior Management;and
the retention value of long-term compensation plans.plans;
alignment of our overall compensation program with our policies and strategies related to human capital management, including diversity, equity, and inclusion; and
exogenous macroeconomic factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
The Committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants, outside counsel, or other advisors to assist the Committee in the discharge of its duties. In any given year, the Committee bases its decision on whether to retain a compensation consultant on factors including prevailing market conditions, regulatory changes governing executive compensation, and the quality of any other relevant data that may be available. If a compensation consultant is engaged, the Chairman of the Committee maintains a direct line of communication with the consultant and arranges meetings with the consultant that may include other members of the Committee and/or the CEO and certain members of Senior Management. The Committee, and/or its Chairman, also periodically meets with the compensation consultant independently of management. Through this communication with the Chairman of the Committee, the consultant reports to, and acts at the direction of, the Committee. Although our CEO and certain members of Senior Management may receive the consultant’s reportreports and data, the Committee retains and exercises sole control and authority over the compensation consultant.
Role of Compensation Consultant. During 2016, the Committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners ("Pearl Meyer"), an independent provider of compensation consulting services, to assist the Committee in its review of our compensation programs. As part of the engagement, Pearl Meyer provided the Committee with an evaluation of industry trends and executive compensation issues in August 2016 that indicated that most companies in our industry had, by that time, frozen or reduced executive base salaries and other elements of executive pay.
Before engaging Pearl Meyer, the Committee confirmed that Pearl Meyer did not provide other services to us, had procedures in place to prevent conflicts of interest, and did not have a business or personal relationship with any of our executive officers or any member of the Committee. The Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that there were no conflicts of interest with us with respect to the compensation consulting services provided by Pearl Meyer. The Committee continues to consider these matters on an ongoing basis.
The Role of Market Data. In most years, Pearl Meyer uses compensation data gathered from our peer group as well as supplemental data from market surveys to benchmark our Senior Management compensation. Our review of this data typically focuses on the main elements of Senior Management compensation: base salary, annual incentive cash award opportunity, long-term compensation, and total direct compensation. Although we review both target compensation and actual compensation paid, our focus is on target compensation, including the target amount of annual cash award opportunities, as it provides the best indication of competitive compensation levels for our Senior Management.
During 2016, the Committee reviewed Pearl Meyer’s evaluation of industry trends and executive compensation issues, which indicated that most companies in our industry had responded to the unprecedented downturn by freezing or reducing executive base salaries and other elements of executive pay. In light of that information, and a recommendation from the CEO that salaries should not be increased during 2017, the Committee did not seek the more specific data on peer-company compensation by position that would typically be provided by Pearl Meyer in November of a given year, and a peer group for the purpose of compensation review was not established.
Role of CEO. Our CEO makes recommendations to the Committee with regard to salary, including any adjustments, and the annual and long-term incentives available to our Senior Management, excluding himself. His recommendations are based on factors such as his judgment and experience, available market data, and his evaluation of individual performance and contribution.
In the Committee’s review of management’s annual compensation report and the changes in compensation recommended by the CEO, the Committee considers the CEO’s evaluations of and recommendations for each member of Senior Management as well as its own evaluations of Senior Management and if a compensation consultant is retained for that year, the reportinput and analysis of the Committee’s compensation consultant. TheIn conjunction with our CEO, the Committee reviews the compensation report in conjunction withof our CEO and approves any prospective changes in compensation for Senior Management other than for our CEO. Subsequently, the Committee, in executive session, establishes the compensation for our CEO.
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
Role of Compensation Consultant. In August of 2019, the Committee retained the services of Meridian Compensation Partners (“Meridian”), a provider of executive compensation consulting and corporate governance services to over 700 major publicly traded and privately held corporations. Before engaging Meridian, the Committee confirmed that Meridian did not have business or personal relationship with any of our executive officers or any member of the Committee, and that Meridian had procedures in place to prevent conflicts of interest. The Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the compensation consulting services provided by Meridian. The Committee continues to consider these matters, as they relate to Meridian, on an ongoing basis.
Peer Groups
In order to ensure the competitiveness of our compensation program, which is a critical factor in our ability to attract and retain high-caliber executive talent, the Committee periodically reviews compensation paid by other companies in the oilfield services industry. For 2021, the Committee, with the assistance of Meridian, adopted one peer group for both our evaluation of Senior Management compensation and our relative TSR performance measure under our long-term incentive awards. The peer group is reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis to ensure that we maintain appropriate comparator companies.
Criteria for selecting companies to be included in the peer group include competition with us in terms of the customers we serve, our belief that we compete with them for talent, overall comparability in terms of size (revenue and market cap), and comparable geographic areas of operation.
In November of 2020, based on Meridian’s recommendation, the Committee adopted the following peer group to be used for the purpose of making appropriate peer comparisons for the Committee’s evaluation of our 2021 compensation program and determination of changes to be made in 2021, and to measure our relative total stockholder return (“RTSR”) under our long-term cash incentive awards to be granted during 2021. Following the adoption of this peer group, the Committee determined that there would be only limited adjustments to 2021 executive compensation, and they did not review specific elements of compensation paid to the peer group:
Compensation & Performance Peer Group Used to evaluate the | • Archrock, Inc. • ChampionX Corporation • Exterran Corporation • Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. • Liberty Oilfield Services, Inc. • Newpark Resources, Inc. | • Oil States International, Inc. • Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. • Precision Drilling Corp. • RPC Inc. • Select Energy Services, Inc. • USA Compression Partners LP |
The Role of Market Data. While the Committee does consider our peer group’s practices in establishing compensation opportunities, it does not specifically benchmark the values of base salaries, annual incentives, or long-term incentives relative to that peer group or any survey data. Rather, the Committee periodically reviews the overall compensation offered by the members of our peer group in order to ensure that our compensation program remains competitive. Although we review both target compensation and actual compensation paid, our focus is on target compensation, including the target amount of annual and long-term award opportunities, as it provides the best indication of competitive compensation levels for our Senior Management.
The market data is also used to gauge industry practices regarding the structure and mechanics of annual and long-term incentive plans.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 47 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
We strongly believe that Senior Management should be compensated with a package that includes at a minimum, the following threefour elements:
salary and industry-standardbenefits,
annual incentive cash compensation tied to key financial and operating results,and
long-term incentive compensation tied to stock price and key long-term value drivers.
Element | Purpose | Key Features | Changes for 2021 |
Base salary | Fixed base pay to competitively compensate executives for their roles at TETRA | •The Committee periodically reviews relevant market data to ensure our salary program is competitive •Salary may be adjusted for performance, expansion of duties and responsibility, and changes in market salary levels •When considering salary adjustments, the Committee reviews corporate performance goals, individual performance and potential, and our CEO’s specific compensation recommendations (except with regard to his own salary) | •Base salaries for our CEO and CFO were reinstated to 90% of pre-pandemic levels in July 2021 in connection with 25% increases in their annual cash incentive targets |
Annual cash incentives | Drive achievement of specific annual performance objectives | •Target award opportunities are a percentage of base salary •A threshold, target, stretch, and over-achievement performance objective is established for each award opportunity •The majority (75%) of short-term incentive is tied to absolute financial measures •2021 measures: Division/Business Unit/Region Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA), Individual Performance Objectives (IPOs), and Safety •Actual payout can range from 0-200% of target | •Because safe operations are a fundamental expectation of all employees at all times, in 2021 safety is a negative modifier that may reduce payments earned under other performance metrics if trailing and leading indicators are not attained |
Long-term cash and equity incentives | Encourage executives to create long-term value for stockholders | •Granted as a combination of time-based TETRA RSUs and performance-based cash awards; mix provides increased retention value and rewards participants for both improved financial results and improved relative TETRA stock price performance •50% of 2021 LTI Award: Long-term Performance-based Cash − 3-year performance period − Payout range of 0% - 200% of target − Performance based on pre-established metrics: 50% - Relative Total Stockholder Return (RTSR) 50% - Return on Net Capital Employed (RONCE) (EBIT) •50% of 2021 LTI Award: TETRA Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) − Vests in installments over 3-year period − Ultimate value is dependent on stock price − TETRA RSUs provide full-value shares to our Senior Management, which is key to retention and aligning interests with our stockholders | •The RONCE (EBIT) performance measure focuses NEOs and Senior Management on creation of sustainable stockholder value through efficient use of capital to generate profits |
Employee benefits | Provide industry-standard benefits so executives can successfully execute their roles and maintain their well-being | •Benefit options offered to our executives are the same as other employees •Retirement plans include 401(k) and deferred compensation | •The Company matching contribution under our 401(k) plan was reinstated in July 2021 |
Each
Our utilization of each of these componentselements in our 2021 compensation program is discussed in greater detail below.
Salary. The Committee reviews relevant survey data and information and analysis provided by its compensation consultant, if one is retained for that year, or by management, if no compensation consultant is engaged, to ensure that our salary program is competitive. We believe that a competitive salary program and industry standard benefits are important factors in our ability to attract and retain Senior Management, and we generally compare base salaries paid to our Senior Management to the median base salaries reflected in the survey data as a check for competitiveness. The Committee reviews the salaries of all members of Senior Management at least annually. Salaries may be adjusted for performance, which may include individual, business unit, and/or company-wide performance, expansion of duties and responsibilities, and changes in market salary levels. In considering salary adjustments, the Committee gives weight to the foregoing factors, with particular emphasis on corporate performance goals, our CEO’s analysis of the individual’s performance and potential, and our CEO’s specific compensation recommendations (except with regard to his own salary). However, the Committee does not rely on formulas and considers all of the above factors when evaluating salary adjustments.
With the exception of Mr. Sanderson, who was first hired by us in November of 2016 and was not subject to the salary reduction program, salary reductions that were implemented during 2016 reducing our NEOs’ base salaries were still in effect as we entered 2017. In January 2017, a portion of our NEOs’ base salaries was restored, and their base salaries were fully reinstated on April 1, 2017. The table below shows the base salaries in effect for each of our NEOs during 2017. Mr. Elkhoury, our former Sr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, was no longer employed by us as of year-end 2017.
Name | Title | Annual Base Salary as of Jan. 1, 2017 |
| Partially Reinstated Base Salary as of Jan. 7, 2017 |
| Fully Reinstated Base Salary Effective Apr. 1, 2017 |
| |||
Stuart M. Brightman | President & Chief Executive Officer | $ | 506,249 |
| $ | 562,499 |
| $ | 625,000 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano | Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| 333,388 |
|
| 370,431 |
|
| 411,590 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson | Sr. Vice President |
| 360,000 |
|
| 360,000 |
|
| 360,000 |
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. | Sr. Vice President & General Counsel |
| 262,829 |
|
| 292,032 |
|
| 324,480 |
|
Peter J. Pintar | Sr. Vice President |
| 299,894 |
|
| 333,216 |
|
| 370,240 |
|
Joseph Elkhoury | Former Sr. Vice President & Chief Operating Officer |
| 364,500 |
|
| 405,000 |
|
| 450,000 |
|
Annual Cash Incentives.Each member of Senior Management is provided an annual cash incentive compensation opportunity, calculated as a percentage of base salary. For each award opportunity, a threshold, target, stretch, and over- achievement performance objective is established for each applicable performance measure and the amount of the award payment that may be received is based on the level of achievement of such objectives.
As part of its December 2016 review of Senior Management compensation, the Committee reviewed a preliminary estimate of the aggregate amount of annual cash incentive compensation to be awarded under our Cash Incentive Compensation Plan based on 2016 performance and discussed the overall effectiveness of the plan in furthering our compensation philosophy. In its consideration of changes for the 2017 plan year, the Committee gave significant
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
weight to the impactThe onset of the prolonged downturn impactingglobal COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent drop in energy prices during the first quarter of 2020 caused an immediate reduction in demand for our industry, products and elected notservices. In response, we actively managed our flexible cost structure by implementing temporary and permanent cost reductions, including reduced capital expenditures, workforce reductions, salary reductions, and suspension of matching contributions under our 401(k) plan. Effective April 11, 2020, the base pay of each of our NEOs was reduced by 20%. Effective July 31, 2021, in light of increased commodity prices and improved activity levels, base salaries for Messrs. Murphy and Serrano were partially reinstated to make changes90% of 2020 pre-pandemic levels, and base salaries for each of our other NEOs were fully reinstated to 100% of 2020 pre-pandemic levels. Also effective on July 31, 2021, the award opportunitiesavailableCommittee increased Mr. Moeller’s base salary by 15.2% in consideration of his new responsibilities managing our carbon capture and energy storage initiatives.
The table below shows the partially- or fully-reinstated base salary for each of our NEOs as of July 31, 2021 that are still in effect as of the date of this Proxy Statement, including the adjustment noted above for Mr. Moeller.
Name | Title | Unreduced 2020 Base Salary |
| Reduced Base Salary Effective April 11, 2020 |
| Reinstated Base Salary Effective July 31, 2021 |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy | President & Chief Executive Officer | $ | 700,000 |
| $ | 560,000 |
| $ | 630,000 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano | Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| 450,000 |
|
| 360,000 |
|
| 405,000 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson | Sr. Vice President |
| 415,000 |
|
| 332,000 |
|
| 415,000 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller | Sr. Vice President |
| 330,000 |
|
| 264,000 |
|
| 380,000 |
|
Jacek M. Mucha | Vice President - Finance & Treasurer |
| 260,000 |
|
| 208,000 |
|
| 260,000 |
|
Annual Cash Incentives
In July of 2021, in connection with the salary adjustments discussed above, the Committee increased the annual performance-based cash incentive targets for our CEO and CFO, placing a larger portion of their target total direct compensation at risk. Specifically, Mr. Murphy’s annual cash incentive target was increased from 100% of his annual base salary toourNEOsforthe2017planyear. 125% of his annual base salary, and Mr. Serrano’s annual cash incentive target was increased from 80% of his annual base salary to 100% of his annual base salary.
The following table sets forth the annual cash award opportunities for the 20172021 plan year, shown as a percentage of annual base salary, for our CEO and each of our other NEOs. As an example, as shown below, Mr. Murphy’s target award opportunity is 125% of his base salary; therefore, his threshold award opportunity, which is 30% of his target award opportunity, is 37.5% of his base salary. No amounts may be earned below the threshold percentage of base salary for any performance measure, and award opportunities are capped at the over-achievement percentage of base salary level for the NEOs shown in the table below. The target annual cash incentive opportunity for each NEO is based on his final 2021 base salary, as shown in the last column of the table above under “Base Salary.”
| Threshold % of Base Salary (30% of Target Award) |
| Target Award as % of Base Salary |
| Stretch % of Base Salary (150% of Target Award) |
| Over-Achievement % of Base Salary (200% of Target Award) |
|
Brady M. Murphy | 37.5% |
| 125.0% |
| 187.5% |
| 250.0% |
|
Elijio V. Serrano | 30.0% |
| 100.0% |
| 150.0% |
| 200.0% |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson | 21.0% |
| 70.0% |
| 105.0% |
| 140.0% |
|
Timothy C. Moeller | 21.0% |
| 70.0% |
| 105.0% |
| 140.0% |
|
Jacek M. Mucha | 15.0% |
| 50.0% |
| 75.0% |
| 100.0% |
|
The following table sets forth the performance measures and target performance objectives approved by the Committee for each of our NEOs for the 2021 plan year under the Cash Incentive Compensation Plan. Mr. Elkhoury, our former Sr. Vice PresidentCICP, and Chief Operating Officer, was no longer employed by us asthe business consideration underlying each performance measure. Please refer to Appendix A of year-end 2017.this Proxy Statement for reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures.
|
| Threshold |
|
| Target |
|
| Stretch |
|
| Over Achievement |
| ||||
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 36 | % |
|
| 120 | % |
|
| 180 | % |
|
| 240 | % |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 24 | % |
|
| 80 | % |
|
| 120 | % |
|
| 160 | % |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 18 | % |
|
| 60 | % |
|
| 90 | % |
|
| 120 | % |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 18 | % |
|
| 60 | % |
|
| 90 | % |
|
| 120 | % |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 18 | % |
|
| 60 | % |
|
| 90 | % |
|
| 120 | % |
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
| 24 | % |
|
| 80 | % |
|
| 120 | % |
|
| 160 | % |
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 49 |
The Committee may establish both financial and non-financial performance measures each year. As part of our ongoing efforts to build a robust culture of performance and a customer-centric environment, each performance measure under the 2017 plan was aligned to one of our four CØRE categories:COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
| Target Performance Objective | Business Consideration |
Aggregate Division Adjusted EBITDA (Determined based on the sum of Division Adjusted EBITDA results, adjusted to include an allocation of Corporate EBITDA) | $53.0 million at target (applicable to Messrs. Murphy and Serrano) | The Aggregate Division Adjusted EBITDA performance measure applies only to Corporate participants and ensures focus on the financial outcome of day-to-day and long-term operating decisions that impact the overall profitability of our businesses, including: • Ensuring that day-to-day spending is tightly managed and aligned with our annual operating budget, and that operational plans and projects (including acquisitions) are quickly integrated in order to maximize efficiencies. • Prioritizing projects across the organization to elevate focus on those that have the greatest potential return on investment. • Driving cross-functional alignment among product lines and geographies to capture incremental improvements in productivity. |
Division Adjusted EBITDA for: Completion Fluids & Products, and Water & Flowback Services | Completion Fluids & Products: $65.2 million at target Water & Flowback Services: $15.3 million at target (the sum of the two targets is applicable to Messrs. Sanderson and Mucha, the Completion Fluids & Products target is applicable to Mr. Moeller) | Our NEOs impact line-of-sight Division Adjusted EBITDA by: •Ensuring differentiation of service quality and depth of service, which position us to manage pricing through market cycles and pursue and maintain relationships with the most profitable customers. •Driving reductions in our cost to deliver services, through robust cost controls, automation, and new technologies. •Managing external relationships, including strong marketing efforts to spearhead our introduction to new geographies and customers. •Fostering innovation to develop new products and technologies that expand our customer base. •Supporting integration of our service offerings, to broaden the scope of products and services we offer to new and existing customers. |
Individual Performance Objectives (“IPOs”) | IPOs provide an opportunity for each NEO to earn incentive compensation based on their personal or team performance compared to established target objectives reviewed by the Committee at the beginning of the plan year. We believe that IPOs are a critical component of the plan structure, as they drive performance related to specific strategic objectives and line-of-sight goals. |
Under the annual Cash Incentive Compensation Planincentive awards for 2017,2021, safety is a negative modifier that may reduce payments earned under other performance metrics if trailing and leading indicators are not attained. In addition, actual results for the TETRAAggregate Division Adjusted EBITDA and Division Adjusted EBITDA performance measuremeasures had to reach a minimum threshold level of 70% of the established target performance objective for any portion of their awards to be earned;objectives shown in the table below that level of performance, no amount could be earned for any performance measure, other than Individual Performance Objectives (IPOs). In addition, for Messrs. Sanderson and Pintar, Division EBITDA for their respective areas of responsibility had to reach a minimum threshold level of 70% of established target performance objectives for any portion of their awards other than IPOs to be earned. For our corporate NEOs (Messrs. Brightman, Serrano, and Wallace), actual results for the TTI Adjusted EBITDA performance measure had to exceed 100% of the target performance objective for any other performance measure (other than IPOs) to be deemed to have been earned above the target level. Similarly, for Messrs. Sanderson and Pintar, Division EBITDA for their respective areas of responsibility had to exceed 100% of the target performance objective for any portion of the award other than IPOsawards based on those measures to be deemed to have been earned above the target level.earned. A threshold payment level of 30% corresponds to the threshold performance level of 70% offor each establishedsuch performance objective (withand a maximum payment level of 150% corresponds to the exceptionmaximum performance level of 125% for each such performance measures in the Drive to ZERØ category, for which no payment is earned for results below the target performance level); forobjective. For actual results that fall between threshold and target,maximum, straight line interpolation is used to determine the earned amount of the award.
Under the terms For results that exceed 125% of Mr. Elkhoury’s Separation and Release Agreement dated June 1, 2017, as further described below, Mr. Elkhoury received a cashan established target performance objective, an over-achievement payment of $180,000up to 200% of an individual’s target award may be allocated by the Committee on March 16, 2018, and he did not receive any portion of his annual Cash Incentive Compensation Plan award for 2017 performance.a discretionary basis.
The following table shows each performance measure for our corporate NEOs (Messrs. Brightman, Serrano, and Wallace) and our NEOs with responsibility for a specific business area (for Mr. Sanderson, our Energy Services Group (ESG) Division, and for Mr. Pintar, our former TETRA Offshore Services (TOS) Division), the CØRE strategy to which it aligns, the target performance objective underand actual 2021 result for each performance measure applicable to our 2017 annual incentiveNEOs, as well as the IPOs that were reviewed and approved by the Committee for each of our NEOs for the 2021 plan our 2017 results, the percentage of the target performance objective attained, and the resulting percentage of the award deemed to have been earned based on 2017 results and the performance criteria discussed above.year.
Performance Measure | Target Performance Objective | Result of 2021 Performance Period |
Aggregate Division Adjusted EBITDA | $53.0 million | $38.0 million (71.7% of target) |
Division Adjusted EBITDA, Completion Fluids & Products | $65.2 million | $50.0 million (76.8% 0f target) |
Division Adjusted EBITDA, Water & Flowback Services | $15.3 million | $14.9 million (94.0% of target) |
50 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 51 |
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
| Strategy | Performance Measure | Target Performance Objective | Result of 2017 Performance Period | % of Target Attained(1) | % of Target Earned(1) |
CUSTOMERS | Develop new business, retain customers and manage price to protect market share | Revenues / Revenues from Key Business (TOS) | $86.9 million / $12.5 million | $96.7 million / $37.1 million | 111.3% / 296.8% | 0.0% / 0.0% |
Revenues from New Business / Sales of T5 Tech. (ESG) | $57.0 million / 25% of revenues | $59.1 million / 24.0% | 103.7% / 96.0% | 103.7% / 90.7% | ||
DRIVE to ZERO | Change behaviors, identify hazards, and manage risks to Drive to Zero incidents | TRIR, CVIR, & BBO Participation(2) (Corporate) | 0.62 TRIR / 0.58 CVIR / 85%BBO | 0.99 TRIR / 0.63 EIR / 87% BBO | 0.0% / 0.0% / 102.4% | 0.0% / 0.0% / 100.0% |
TRIR, CVIR, & BBO Participation(2) (ESG) | 0.64 TRIR / 0.52 CVIR / 70%BBO | 1.51 TRIR / 0.77 CVIR / 80% BBO | 0.0% / 0.0% / 114.3% | 0.0% / 0.0% / 114.3% | ||
TRIR, EIR, & BBO Participation(2) (TOS) | 0.14 TRIR / 0.00 EIR / 90% BBO | 0.08 TRIR / 0.00 EIR / 117% BBO | 143% / 100% / 130% | 0.0% / 0.0% / 0.0% | ||
RETURNS | Identify synergies, optimize costs and leverage to safeguard profitability | TTI Adj. EBITDA (All NEOs) | $86.5 million | $75.4 million | 87.2% | 70.1% |
ESG EBITDA & ESG Operating Expense Savings | $56.8 million / $4.0 million | $63.7 million / $6.4 million | 111.2% / 160.0% | 111.2% / 150.0% | ||
TOS EBITDA & TOS Operating Expense Savings | $9.2 million / $1.0 million | $(725) million / $2.2 million | 0.0% / 220.0% | 0.0% / 0.0% | ||
EMPLOYEES | Train, retain, and recognize high value employees to improve performance | High-value retention (All NEOs) | 90% retention | 100% retention | 100% | 100% |
Performance Reviews | Completion of annual performance reviews | 100% completion | 100% | 100% | ||
Training (all NEOs) | 1 training completed per quarter, per employee | Better than 90% of employees completed each quarterly training | 100% | 100% |
|
|
|
| Mr. Sanderson | Mr. Moeller | Mr. Mucha | |
Achieve 2021 RONCE goal, deliver target free cash flow, and right-size corporate SG&A following divestiture of CSI Compressco | X | X | X | X | X |
Maintain overall driving scores at or above 90%, improve TRIR a minimum of 15% compared to 2020 | X | X | X | X | X |
Ensure execution of key employee development plans, retain at least 90% of identified key employees, make meaningful progress toward D&I objectives | X | X | X | X | |
Continue to progress long-term strategies, including continued differentiation of water and flowback services, develop branding around new initiatives, continue to develop low carbon strategies, improve international market share | X | X | X | X | |
Overall 2021 IPO Performance Rating | Exceptional | Exceeds Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | Exceptional | Exceptional |
The relative weight of specific performance measures varies based on each participant's responsibilities; however, for each NEO, performance measures in the Returns category comprise 70% of the total target annual incentive, reflecting our NEOs’ significant focus on generating strong financial returns. Individual performance objectives (“IPOs”) for each NEO are aligned to the CØRE strategies and were approved by the Committee in February 2017. The following tables showtable shows the weight of each performance measure, the percentage of the award deemed to have been earned based on 2017 results and the performance criteria discussed above and 2021 results, and the amount of the award opportunity earned related to each performance measure.
| Target Amount of 2021 Award Opportunity |
| Weight of Financial Performance Measure |
| Weighted % of Financial Performance Measure Earned |
| Weight of IPOs |
| Weighted % of IPOs Earned |
|
| Total Amount of 2021 Award Earned |
| ||||||
Brady M. Murphy | $ | 787,500 |
|
| 75.0 | % |
| 25.4 | % |
| 25.0 | % |
| 23.3 | % |
| $ | 383,035 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 405,000 |
|
| 75.0 | % |
| 25.4 | % |
| 25.0 | % |
| 20.6 | % |
|
| 186,358 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| 290,500 |
|
| 75.0 | % |
| 41.2 | % |
| 25.0 | % |
| 18.9 | % |
|
| 174,543 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller |
| 266,000 |
|
| 75.0 | % |
| 34.3 | % |
| 25.0 | % |
| 23.3 | % |
|
| 153,186 |
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
| 130,000 |
|
| 75.0 | % |
| 41.2 | % |
| 25.0 | % |
| 25.0 | % |
|
| 86,071 |
|
Long-Term Incentives
2021 Awards of Long-Term Incentives
Target values of awards of long-term incentives granted to our NEOs in 2021 consist 50% of TETRA RSUs and 50% of long-term performance-based cash. In establishing the structure of these awards, the Committee considered the following factors: the similar retention value provided by long-term awards of equity and cash; their desire to ensure that a minimum of 50% of the target values of long-term awards would be at-risk, based on achievement of specific long-term financial and other performance objectives; and, the need to conserve the number of stockholder approved equity awards available under our equity plan.
The following table summarizes the 2021 awards of long-term incentives to each of our NEOs.
| Target Amount of Award Opportunity |
| Weight of Metric |
| % of Target Earned |
| Weighted % Earned |
| Amount of Award Earned |
| |||||
Stuart M. Brightman | $ | 749,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 70.0 | % |
| 70.1 | % |
| 49.1 | % | $ | 367,874 |
|
Corporate TRIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Corporate CVIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Corporate BBO Participation |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 12,525 |
|
High Value Retention |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 12,525 |
|
Performance Reviews |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 12,525 |
|
Training |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 12,525 |
|
IPOs |
|
|
|
| 20.0 | % |
| 90.0 | % |
| 18.0 | % |
| 135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| 73.7 | % | $ | 552,974 |
|
|
| Target Value of TETRA Restricted Stock Units(1) |
|
| Target Value of Long-Term Performance-Based Cash |
|
| Total Target Long-Term Award Value(1) |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy |
| $ | 1,250,000 |
|
| $ | 1,250,000 |
|
| $ | 2,500,000 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| 1,000,000 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 300,000 |
|
|
| 300,000 |
|
|
| 600,000 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller |
|
| 200,000 |
|
|
| 200,000 |
|
|
| 400,000 |
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
| 112,500 |
|
|
| 112,500 |
|
|
| 225,000 |
|
(1) | The values of TETRA RSUs and the Total Long-Term Award Values in the table above reflect the values targeted by the Committee when granting these awards. The numbers of TETRA RSUs awarded are determined using 20-day average closing market prices through the day prior to the award date. For actual grant date values of the number of TETRA RSUs awarded, refer to the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
| Target Amount of Award Opportunity |
| Weight of Metric |
| % of Target Earned |
| Weighted % Earned |
| Amount of Award Earned |
| |||||
Elijio V. Serrano | $ | 329,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 70.0 | % |
| 70.1 | % |
| 49.1 | % | $ | 161,508 |
|
Corporate TRIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Corporate CVIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Corporate BBO Participation |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 5,499 |
|
High Value Retention |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 5,499 |
|
Performance Reviews |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 5,499 |
|
Training |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 5,499 |
|
IPOs |
|
|
|
| 20.0 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 20.0 | % |
| 65,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| 75.7 | % | $ | 249,358 |
|
| Target Amount of Award Opportunity |
| Weight of Metric |
| % of Target Earned |
| Weighted % Earned |
| Amount of Award Earned |
| |||||
Matthew J. Sanderson | $ | 216,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 30.0 | % |
| 70.1 | % |
| 21.0 | % | $ | 45,403 |
|
ESG Division EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 30.0 | % |
| 111.2 | % |
| 33.4 | % |
| 72,058 |
|
ESG OpEx Savings |
|
|
|
| 10.0 | % |
| 150.0 | % |
| 15.0 | % |
| 32,400 |
|
ESG Revenues from New Business |
|
|
|
| 5.0 | % |
| 103.7 | % |
| 5.2 | % |
| 11,189 |
|
ESG Sales of T5 Technology |
|
|
|
| 5.0 | % |
| 90.7 | % |
| 4.5 | % |
| 9,785 |
|
ESG TRIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
ESG CVIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
ESG BBO Participation |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 114.3 | % |
| 1.9 | % |
| 4,104 |
|
High Value Retention |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 3,607 |
|
Performance Reviews |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 3,607 |
|
Training |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 120.5 | % |
| 2.0 | % |
| 4,342 |
|
IPOs |
|
|
|
| 10.0 | % |
| 90.0 | % |
| 9.0 | % |
| 19,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| 95.3 | % | $ | 205,934 |
|
| Target Amount of Award Opportunity |
| Weight of Metric |
| % of Target Earned |
| Weighted % Earned |
| Amount of Award Earned |
| |||||
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. | $ | 194,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 70.0 | % |
| 70.1 | % |
| 49.1 | % | $ | 95,494 |
|
Corporate TRIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Corporate CVIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Corporate BBO Participation |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 3,251 |
|
High Value Retention |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 3,251 |
|
Performance Reviews |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 3,251 |
|
Training |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 1.7 | % |
| 3,251 |
|
IPOs |
|
|
|
| 20.0 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
| 20.0 | % |
| 38,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| 75.7 | % | $ | 147,437 |
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
Target Amount of Award Opportunity |
| Weight of Metric |
| % of Target Earned |
| Weighted % Earned |
| Amount of Award Earned |
| ||||||
Peter J. Pintar | $ | 222,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 30.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % | $ | - |
|
TOS Division EBITDA |
|
|
|
| 30.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
TOS OpEx Savings |
|
|
|
| 10.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
TOS Revenues |
|
|
|
| 5.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Revenues from Key Business |
|
|
|
| 5.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
TOS TRIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
TOS EIR |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
TOS BBO Participation |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
High Value Retention |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Performance Reviews |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
Training |
|
|
|
| 1.7 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| 0.0 | % |
| - |
|
IPOs |
|
|
|
| 10.0 | % |
| 80.0 | % |
| 8.0 | % |
| 17,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| 8.0 | % | $ | 17,772 |
|
Long-Term Incentive Awards
Long-term incentives (or “LTI”) have historically comprised a significant portion of our Senior Management’s total compensation package. The Committee seeks to strike a balance between achieving short-term annual results and ensuring strong long-term success through grants of stock options, restricted stock, and long-term cash incentives for members of TETRA’s Senior Management, all of which are geared toward longer-term performance as they generally vest over multiple years and their values are tied to TETRA stockholder returns and longer term value drivers. We believe that tying a significant portion of the compensation of our CEO and our Senior Management team directly to our stockholders’ returns is an important aspect of our total compensation plan.
The following table summarizes the various elements of our 2017 long-term incentive program for our NEOs and Senior Management of TETRA, and their alignment with our compensation principles:
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
2017 Program Awards
While the Committee does consider peer group compensation practices in establishing equity incentive opportunities, it does not specifically benchmark the value of equity awards relative to any survey or peer group data. The Committee has observed that market price volatility resulting from changes in commodity prices, weather events in the Gulfhistorically approved awards of Mexico and elsewhere, and other industry-specific and broader, macro-economic cycles and trends create significant year-to-year variances in the value of our equity awards. As these variances are difficult to predict and may not impact all peer group companieslong-term incentives on an equalannual basis, the accuracy and usefulnessin February of peer group data in establishing specific equity award benchmarks may be limited.each calendar year, following their review of prior calendar year performance. The Committee does, however, annually review peer group equity compensation practices in order to gain a general impressionapproved annual awards of the proportionate share of equity award value and the magnitude of equity awards in the total compensation packages offered by peer group companies.
The following tables summarizes the 2017 LTI grants to each of our Named Executive Officers:
|
| Stock/ Options Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
| Restricted Shares |
|
| Long-Term Performance Based Cash |
|
| Total Long-Term Award Value |
| ||||
Stuart M. Brightman(1) |
| $ | 638,827 |
|
| $ | 750,004 |
|
| $ | 1,000,000 |
|
| $ | 2,388,831 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 285,000 |
|
|
| 285,000 |
|
|
| 380,000 |
|
|
| 950,000 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 135,001 |
|
|
| 135,002 |
|
|
| 180,000 |
|
|
| 450,003 |
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 139,050 |
|
|
| 139,052 |
|
|
| 185,400 |
|
|
| 463,502 |
|
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 112,502 |
|
|
| 112,502 |
|
|
| 150,000 |
|
|
| 375,004 |
|
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
| 345,001 |
|
|
| 345,001 |
|
|
| 460,000 |
|
|
| 1,150,002 |
|
|
|
Time-Based Awards GrantedTETRA RSUs under the TETRA 2011First Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan during 2017.
The Committee approved awards of TETRA stock options and restricted stock(the “2018 Plan”) to each of our NEOs on February 22, 2017.17, 2021. One-third of the TETRA stock options, which were granted with an exercise price equal to 100% of the market price on the date of grant,RSUs vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and 2.78% portions of the stock options vest monthly thereafter. One-third of the shares of restricted stock vests on the first anniversary of the grant date, and 16% portionsa one-sixth portion of the shares of restricted stockRSUs will vest once every six months thereafter.until fully vested.
Subsequent to the Committee’s approval of such awards, we determined that the aggregate number of shares of our common stock covered by the February 22, 2017 award to Mr. Brightman were not validly granted pursuant to the 2011 Plan because such awards exceeded plan limits on the maximum awards that may be granted to a participant in a calendar year. Accordingly, on August 9, 2017, the Committee modified and reformed the stock option award to Mr. Brightman to cover a total of 233,702 shares of our common stock. References in this proxy statement to Mr. Brightman’s 2017 stock option awards reflect only the stock option awards that were validly granted. Also on August 9, 2017, the Committee unanimously approved the grant of cash-settled stock appreciation rights covering 133,946 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price equal to the exercise price contained in the voided awards. One-third of such stock appreciation rights, vested on February 22, 2018, and 16% portions of the stock appreciation rights vest once every six months thereafter. The stock appreciation rights were designed to replace the value of the stock options that were not validly granted.
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentives.
In February 2017,17, 2021, the Committee established performance measures and performance objectives applicable to the long-term, performance-based cash incentiveportions of the LTI awards granted to our NEOsNEOs. Such awards were granted under the Cash Incentive Compensation PlanCICP for the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2019.2023. The performance measures and the relative weights of each such performance measure for these long-term cash incentive awards are:
TETRA's three-year cumulative free cash flowRONCE (EBIT) for each year in the three-year period ending December 31, 2019,2023, weighted 50%; and
total stockholder return relative to aour peer group for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019,2023, weighted 50%.
For these 2021 long-term cash awards, the Committee determined to utilize the RONCE (EBIT) performance measure in order to focus our NEOs and Senior Management on creation of sustainable stockholder value.
In addition, a cap of 100% of the target award amount will be imposed on the 50% portion of the long-term cash awards based on relative TSR if our absolute TSR over the three-year performance period is negative. The Committee believes that this provision promotes better alignment with the financial outcomes experienced by our long-term stockholders.
On an annual basis, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, the Committee develops a peer group that is used to measure our RTSR under our long-term cash incentive awards. The peer group is comprised of companies that directly compete with us in terms of one or more of the products and services we offer or the customers and geographies we serve. The following peer group was adopted by the Committee in November of 2020 in anticipation of their approval of the long-term cash incentive compensation awards for the performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023:
Compensation & Performance Peer Group Used to evaluate the | • Archrock, Inc. • ChampionX Corporation • Exterran Corporation • Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. • Liberty Oilfield Services, Inc. • Newpark Resources, Inc. | • Oil States International, Inc. • Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. • Precision Drilling Corp. • RPC Inc. • Select Energy Services, Inc. • USA Compression Partners LP |
For each performance measure, the following performance objectives and payment levels have been established by the Committee. If actual results fall between these established performance levels, straight line interpolation will be used to determine earned amounts of the awards:
For TETRA's RONCE (EBIT), the threshold performance level is 80% of the target performance objective and corresponds to a 30% payment level; no portion of the award may be earned for results below the threshold performance level. The stretch performance level is 125% of the target performance objective and corresponds to a 150% payment level, and the over-achievement performance level is 150% of the target performance objective and corresponds to a 200% payment level.
For total stockholder return relative to our peer group for the three-year period ending December 31, 2023, the threshold performance level is 50% of the target performance objective and corresponds to a 0% payment level; no portion of the award may be earned for results below the threshold performance level. The stretch performance level is 150% of the target performance objective and corresponds to a 200% payment level.
|
|
|
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 53 |
For each performance measure, a threshold, target, stretch, and over achievement performance objective has been established by the Committee.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The amountamounts of the awardawards that may be earned by a participant at the end of the three-year performance period will be based on our attainment of suchthese performance objectives, subject to the discretion of the Committee.
Payment of Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentives Granted in 2015. 2019
In May 2015,February of 2019, the Committee established performance measures and performance objectives applicable to long-term cash incentive awards granted to certain of our NEOs under the Cash Incentive Compensation PlanCICP for the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2017.2021. The performance measures for these long-term incentive awards granted to Messrs. Murphy, Serrano, and the weight ofSanderson were: TETRA’s cash from operations per share for each performance measureyear in the determination of payouts under the awards were:
three-year period ended December 31, 2021; and total stockholder return relative to aour performance peer group weightedfor the three-year period ending December 31, 2021. The performance measure for these long-term incentive awards granted to Messrs. Moeller and Mucha was TETRA’s cash from operations per share for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021.
In addition, in May of 2019 upon Mr. Murphy’s promotion to the position of Chief Executive Officer, the Committee established a performance measure and performance objectives applicable to a long-term cash incentive award for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2021. The sole performance measure for this long-term cash incentive award was RONCE (EBIT), determined on an annual basis, with payment of any earned amounts deferred until March of 2022. Our RONCE (EBIT) performance measure is defined as earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), divided by the average of current year and last year net capital employed. Net capital employed is defined as total assets minus cash, minus current liabilities, plus current debt. The Committee utilized the RONCE (EBIT) performance measure for this long-term incentive award in order to focus our then incoming CEO on the creation of sustainable stockholder value. Please refer to Appendix A in this Proxy Statement for reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures.
Payments Earned Under 2019 relative TSR Performance Measure.50%; and The following performance peer group was adopted by the Committee in 2019 in connection with their approval of the long-term cash incentive compensation awards based on relative TSR for the performance period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021:
cumulativefreecashflowforthethree-yearperiodendedDecember31,2017,weighted50%.
Performance Peer Group Used to evaluate our RTSR under performance-based | • Archrock, Inc. • Basic Energy Services, Inc. • C&J Energy Services, Inc. • Flotek Industries, Inc. • Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. • Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. • Key Energy Services, Inc. | • Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. • Newpark Resources, Inc. • Oceaneering International, Inc. • Select Energy Services, Inc. • Superior Energy Services, Inc. • Tidewater Inc. • USA Compression Partners, LP |
For eachthe relative TSR performance measure, a threshold, target, stretch, and over achievementstretch performance objective was established by the Committee. Messrs. Sanderson and Elkhoury, who were not employed by us at the time the 2015 awards were granted, did not receive long-term performance-based cash incentive awards in 2015.
The following table provides the specific performance objectiveobjectives established by the Committee for each of the relative TSR performance measuresmeasure and the portion of the target amount of the total award that would be earned at each level of performance:
Performance & Payout Levels – 2015 Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentives | ||||||||||
Performance Level |
| TSR v. Peer Group |
| Portion of Target Award Vested |
|
| 3-Year Cumulative Free Cash Flow |
| Portion of Target Award Vested |
|
Below Threshold |
| below 25th %tile |
| —% |
|
| $133.0 million |
| —% |
|
Threshold |
| 25th %tile |
| 10% |
|
| $133.0 million |
| 10% |
|
Target |
| 50th %tile |
| 50% |
|
| $190.0 million |
| 50% |
|
Stretch |
| 75th %tile |
| 80% |
|
| $247.0 million |
| 80% |
|
Over Achievement |
| 90th %tile |
| 100% |
|
| $285.0 million |
| 100% |
|
2019 Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentives: TSR vs. Peer Group |
| ||||
Performance Level | Target Performance Objective | Portion of Target Award Vested | |||
Threshold | 25th %tile | 0% | |||
Target | 50th %tile | 100% | |||
Stretch | 75th %tile | 200% |
Based on an analysis of our results for the performance period ended December 31, 2017,2021, the Committee has determined that our total stockholder return placed us at the 7996.7thpercentile (within the first quartile, as shown below) of the applicable peer group, betweenabove the stretch and over achievement performance levels. While recognizing thatlevel. In addition, our total stockholder returnabsolute TSR for the performance period was negative,52.9%, and we were one of only two companies in our peer group to achieve a positive TSR for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. Accordingly, the Committee noteddetermined that only one company in200% of the peer grouprelative TSR portion of the 2019 award had achieved a positive total stockholder return for the performance period,been earned, and our ability to outperform the majority of our peers in an extremely challenging market meritedapproved payment of the total stockholder return portionfollowing earned portions of the award between2019 awards based on relative TSR to the stretch and over achievement levels established by the Committee.
following NEOs who received such awards:
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
|
| Target Value of 2019 Long-Term Cash Incentive Award based on Relative TSR |
|
| Amount Earned as of December 31, 2021 |
|
| % of Target Award Opportunity Earned |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy |
| $ | 375,000 |
|
| $ | 750,000 |
|
|
| 200.0 | % |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 237,500 |
|
|
| 475,000 |
|
|
| 200.0 | % |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 125,000 |
|
|
| 250,000 |
|
|
| 200.0 | % |
Payments Earned Under 2019 Cash from Operations per Share Performance Measure.2015 Peer Group TSR Percentile Rank The following table provides the specific performance objectives established by the Committee for the cash from operations per share performance measure and the portion of the target amount of the award that would be earned at each level of performance:
2019 Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentives: 3-Year Cash From Operations per Share |
| ||||||||||||
|
| Target Performance Objectives |
|
| Portion of |
| |||||||
Performance Level |
| Year 1 |
| Year 2 |
| Year 3 |
|
| Target Award Vested |
| |||
Threshold |
| $ | 0.33 |
| $ | 0.56 |
| $ | 0.65 |
|
| 0% |
|
Target |
| $ | 0.41 |
| $ | 0.70 |
| $ | 0.81 |
|
| 100% |
|
Stretch |
| $ | 0.51 |
| $ | 0.88 |
| $ | 1.01 |
|
| 200% |
|
The Committee further determined that our three-year cumulative free cash flowfrom operations per share results for the performance period did not reach the required threshold level of performance. Accordingly, the Committee has approved payment of the following earnedperformance and no portions of the 20152019 long-term, performance-based cash awards were earned by the following NEOs who received such awards:
|
| Target Value of 2019 Long-Term Cash Incentive Award based on Cash from Operations per Share |
|
| Amount Earned as of December 31, 2021 |
|
| % of Target Award Opportunity Earned |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy |
| $ | 375,000 |
|
| $ | 0 |
|
|
| 0.0 | % |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 237,500 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 0.0 | % |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 125,000 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 0.0 | % |
Timothy C. Moeller |
|
| 62,500 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 0.0 | % |
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
| 30,000 |
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
| 0.0 | % |
Payments Earned Under 2019 RONCE (EBIT) Performance Measure. The following table provides the specific performance objectives established by the Committee for the RONCE (EBIT) performance measure and the percentage of the target amount of the award that may be earned at each level of performance, as well as the portion of the total target award amount that may be earned for each year within the three-year performance period:
2019 Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentives: RONCE (EBIT) |
| ||||||||||
|
| Target Performance Objectives |
|
| Portion of |
| |||||
Performance Level |
| Year 1 |
| Year 2 |
| Year 3 |
|
| Target Award Vested |
| |
Threshold |
| 2.0% |
| 8.9% |
| 10.7% |
|
| 30% |
| |
Target |
| 2.5% |
| 11.1% |
| 13.4% |
|
| 100% |
| |
Stretch |
| 3.1% |
| 13.9% |
| 16.8% |
|
| 150% |
| |
OA |
| 3.8% |
| 41.9% |
| 48.1% |
|
| 200% |
| |
Portion of Total Award That May Be Earned, at Target, for Performance in Each Year |
| 10.0% |
| 41.9% |
| 48.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee determined that our RONCE (EBIT) result for the first year in the three-year performance period was 2.8%, above the target performance level established for that year, and 124% of the 10% portion of the total target award for the first year was deemed to be earned. Following the end of the second and third years in the three-year performance period, the Committee determined that our RONCE (EBIT) results for each applicable year did not reach the required threshold level of performance. Payment of the portion of the award earned based on performance during the first year was deferred until March 2022 for Mr. Murphy:
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 55 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
|
| Target Value of 2019 Long-Term Cash Incentive Award based on RONCE (EBIT) |
|
| Amount Earned as of December 31, 2021 |
|
| % of Target Award Opportunity Earned |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy |
| $ | 1,000,000 |
|
| $ | 124,000 |
|
|
| 12.4 | % |
Payments Earned Under 2020 Performance Awards
During 2020, the sudden onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent drop in energy prices created a need to review and refocus the target performance objectives established under our CICP for 2020. Considering this uncertainty and acknowledging our particular need to retain key employees critical to the long-term success of our businesses, the Committee approved time- and performance-based incentive awards (“Performance Awards”) for certain NEOs, that would be settled at the end of the performance period in a combination of cash and stock.
In determining the structure and maximum award opportunities available under the Performance Awards, the Committee gave significant weight to the following officersfactors:
The base salary of each of our NEOs had been reduced by 20%.
Annual awards under our CICP for 2020 were not expected to be earned (and in fact, none of the NEOs who received such awardsa 2020 Performance Award earned any portion of their CICP award for 2020).
The market for executive management talent was very competitive with a number of companies emerging from bankruptcies with strong balance sheets and who are includedlooking for new leadership.
The maximum value of each Performance Award was equal to 100% of each NEOs’ unreduced annual base salary for 2020 (“Unreduced Salary”). The Performance Awards were comprised of the following four components:
□ Component One Time-Based Amount | |
■ Component Two Time-Based Amount | |
■ Component One Maximum Performance-Based Amount | |
■ Component Two Maximum Performance-Based Amount |
The dollar value of the time-based amount and maximum performance-based amount with respect to each component of the Performance Awards granted to each NEO is shown in our NEOs for 2017:the table below:
2015 Earned Award Opportunities - Long-Term Cash Incentive Compensation Plan |
| |||||||
|
| Target Value of 2015 Long-Term Performance-Based Award |
|
| Amount Earned as of December 31, 2017 |
| ||
Stuart M. Brightman |
| $ | 584,025 |
|
| $ | 494,669 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 225,000 |
|
|
| 190,575 |
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 115,875 |
|
|
| 98,146 |
|
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 222,144 |
|
|
| 188,156 |
|
| Component One Time-Based Amount |
| Component One Maximum Performance-Based Amount |
| Component Two Time-Based Amount |
| Component Two Maximum Performance-Based Amount |
| ||||
Brady M. Murphy | $ | 87,500 |
| $ | 87,500 |
| $ | 87,500 |
| $ | 437,500 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 56,250 |
|
| 56,250 |
|
| 56,250 |
|
| 281,250 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| 51,875 |
|
| 51,875 |
|
| 51,875 |
|
| 259,375 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller |
| 41,250 |
|
| 41,250 |
|
| 41,250 |
|
| 206,250 |
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
| 32,500 |
|
| 32,500 |
|
| 32,500 |
|
| 162,500 |
|
• | Component One – The maximum amount of component one of the Performance Awards (“Component One”) was equal to 25% of each applicable NEO’s Unreduced Salary. One half of Component One was time-based and earned on the earlier of April 2, 2021 and the date of a “Change in Control” (as defined in the 2018 Plan) (such applicable date, the “Achievement Date”), contingent upon the NEO’s continued employment through the Achievement Date. The remainder of Component One was earned based upon (i) the NEO’s continued employment through the Achievement Date and (ii) our attainment of at least (x) $60 million of liquidity as of |
56 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
December 31, 2020 and (y) $8 million of adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2020. To the extent performance exceeded such threshold goals, the amount earned with respect to the performance-based portion of Component One was proportionately increased to reflect the amount by which performance exceeded such goals. |
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 57 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
•Component Two – The maximum amount of component two of the Performance Awards (“Component Two”) was equal to 75% of each applicable NEO’s Unreduced Salary. One-sixth of Component Two was time-based and earned on the Achievement Date, contingent upon the NEO’s continued employment through such date. The remainder of Component Two was earned based upon (i) the NEO’s continued employment through the Achievement Date and (ii) the level of appreciation of the average closing market price for our common stock over a minimum of $0.28 per share (the closing market price for our stock on March 31, 2020) for the ten consecutive trading days preceding March 31, 2021. |
Average Stock Price as of March 31, 2021 | Component Two Performance-Based Amount (% of Unreduced Salary) |
|
$0.28 or less | —% |
|
$0.57 | 12.5% |
|
$1.14 | 37.5% |
|
$2.28 | 62.5% |
|
As of April 2, 2021, each NEO who received a Performance Award earned the Component One and Two time-based amounts. Further, based on our attainment of $93.7 million of liquidity as of December 31, 2020, adjusted EBITDA of $11.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2020, and an average closing market price of $2.72 for the ten consecutive trading days preceding March 31, 2021, 84.3% of the Component One performance-based amount (based on the proportional increase in liquidity from the $60 million target to our $93.7 million result), and 100% of the Component Two performance-based amount were deemed to have been earned. Please refer to Appendix A in this Proxy Statement for reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures. The table below shows amounts earned and payable in cash and stock with respect to the Performance Awards as determined on the April 2, 2021 Achievement Date, and reported as compensation earned during 2021 in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement.
| Total Target Amount of Performance Award Earned |
| Portion of Award Paid in Cash |
| Portion of Award Paid in Immediately Vested Shares |
| |||
$ | 686,263 |
|
| 61.7 | % |
| 38.3 | % | |
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 441,169 |
|
| 61.7 | % |
| 38.3 | % |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| 406,856 |
|
| 80.9 | % |
| 19.1 | % |
Timothy C. Moeller |
| 323,524 |
|
| 80.9 | % |
| 19.1 | % |
Jacek M. Mucha |
| 254,898 |
|
| 80.9 | % |
| 19.1 | % |
Retirement, Health, and Welfare Benefits
We offer a variety of health and welfare benefits to all eligible employees. Members of Senior Management are generally eligible for the same benefit programs on the same basis as the broad-base of our employees. Our health and welfare programs are intended to protect employees against catastrophic loss and to encourage a healthy lifestyle. These health and welfare programs include medical, wellness, pharmacy, dental, life insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, and insurance against accidental death and disability.
401(k) Plan. We offer a 401(k) program that is intended to supplement a participant’s personal savings and social security benefits. Under our 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), eligible employees may contribute on a pretax basis up to 70% of their compensation, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount established under the Code. We generally make a matching contribution under the 401(k) Plan equal to 50% of the first 6%8% of annual compensation the participant contributes to the 401(k) Plan; however,Plan. Matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan were suspended from April of 2020 through October of 2021 in connection with other cost reduction efforts,actions taken in response to the matching contribution was suspended from May 2016 through August 2017.global COVID-19 pandemic. As of December 31, 2017,2021, approximately 90%88% of all eligible employees were participating in the 401(k) Plan. All employees (other than nonresident aliens) who have reached the age of
58 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
eighteen and have completed six months of service with us are eligible to participate in the 401(K) Plan.Plan beginning on the first day of the month following their completion of 30 days of service with us.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. We provide our Senior Management, directors, and certain other key employees with the opportunity to participate in the Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan, an unfunded, deferred compensation program. There were 2513 participants in the program at December 31, 2017.2021 (none of our current NEOs participate in this plan). Under the program, participants may defer a specified portion of their annual total cash compensation, including salary and performance-based cash incentive compensation, subject to certain established minimums. The amounts deferred may increase or decrease depending on the deemed investment elections selected by the participant from among various
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
hypothetical investment election options. Deferral contributions and earnings credited to such contributions are 100% vested and may be distributed in cash at a time selected by the participant and irrevocably designated on the participant’s deferral form. In-service distributions may not be withdrawn until two years following the participant’s initial enrollment. Notwithstanding the participant’s deferral election, the participant will receive distribution of his deferral account if the participant becomes disabled or dies, or upon a change in control.
Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, requires us to disclose the annual total compensation of Mr. Brightman, our CEO, and our median employee, as well as the ratio of their respective annual total compensation to each other (in each case, with annual total compensation calculated in accordance with SEC rules applicable to the Summary Compensation Table). For 2017:
Median employee’s total compensation$72,760
Mr. Brightman’s total annual compensation$3,042,482
Ratio of CEO to median employee compensation41.8 to 1
We used a consistently applied compensation measure to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees, and to determine the annual total compensation of our CEO. To make them comparable, salaries for newly hired employees who had worked less than a year were annualized, and the target annual bonus amount was applied to their total compensation measure. To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees and the median employee’s compensation, we took the following steps:
We determined that our employee population as of December 31, 2017 consisted of 2,575 full- and part-time employees located in 12 countries (we do not have temporary or seasonal workers).
We selected December 31, 2017 as our identification date for determining our median employee because it enabled us to make such identification in a reasonably efficient and economic matter.
For our international employees paid in their local currency, we converted each such employee’s total annual compensation as of December 31, 2017 to U.S. dollars; however, we did not make any cost of living adjustment with respect to any of our U.S. or international employees.
The CEO pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in accordance with SEC rules and methods for disclosure. Due to estimates, assumptions, and adjustments, as well as significantly varying workforce structures, CEO pay ratios reported by other companies are not likely to be comparable to our CEO pay ratio.
Perquisites (“perks”) are not a material component of our executive compensation. In general, NEOs are not compensated for and do not receive reimbursements for the private use of country clubs, meals, airline and travel costs other than those costs allowed for all employees, or for tickets to sporting events or entertainment events, unless such tickets are used for business purposes. Further, our NEOs do not receive compensation or reimbursements for hunting and fishing camp costs or home security expenses. During 2017,2021, no NEO received any compensation for or reimbursement of any of the foregoing costs or expenses incurred for non-business purposes.
In 2018, the Committee adopted the Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, or Clawback Policy. This policy covers recoupment of certain incentive compensation paid to certain of our officers, including each of our NEOs. Incentive compensation includes any performance bonuses or incentive awards, including short and long-term incentive bonuses (in cash or otherwise) and all forms of equity-based awards that are granted, earned or vested under any TETRA plan, arrangement or agreement based wholly or in part on the attainment of a financial reporting measure. The policy provides a mechanism to recoup incentive compensation in the event we are required to prepare a restatement of our previously issued financial statements to correct one or more errors that are material to those financial statements (other than to comply with changes in applicable accounting principles or to reflect retrospective reclassification or adjustment in accordance with applicable SEC rules and regulations) due to our material noncompliance with any financial requirement under the federal securities laws or in the event that our board concludes that a covered officer engaged in misconduct that caused significant financial or reputational harm to us but did not cause the need for a restatement of our financial statements.
Severance Plan and Termination Payments
With the exception of the Change of Control Agreements described below, and the Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. Elkhoury, we do not have a defined severance plan for, or any agreement with, any Named Executive Officer that would require us to make any termination payments.
Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. Elkhoury. On June 1, 2017, in connection with his resignation from the positions of Sr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, we entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Elkhoury, pursuant to which Mr. Elkhoury remained employed by us and provided transition services to us through November 30, 2017. The Separation Agreement contains a confidentiality provision and imposes other obligations on Mr. Elkhoury that are applicable before and after his effective separation date. In addition, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Separation Agreement, Mr.
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
Elkhoury received a lump sum payment of $400,000, less legally required withholdings, on June 6, 2017. Upon termination of Mr. Elkhoury’s employment, the remaining unvested shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to his inducement award became fully vested and were no longer subject to forfeiture. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement and as a result of Mr. Elkhoury continuing his employment with us through November 30, 2017, (a) 12,124 shares of unvested restricted stock awarded to Mr. Elkhoury in 2017 became fully vested and no longer subject to forfeiture, and (b) Mr. Elkhoury received a cash payment of $180,000 on March 16, 2018. Mr. Elkhoury also received payment or waiver of any contribution that would otherwise be required from him for continuing to receive coverage for medical, prescription, and dental benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, through the date of Mr. Elkhoury’s commencement of other employment through which he became eligible for such benefits.
We have previously entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Brightman,Murphy, Serrano, Sanderson, Wallace,Moeller, and PintarMucha that are substantially identical to the form of agreement executed by all of our employees. Each agreement evidences the at-will nature of employment and does not guarantee the term of employment, which is entirely at the discretion of the Board of Directors, or otherwise set forth the salary and other compensation of the NEOs, which is established in accordance with the procedures described above. Mr. Elkhoury had also executed a similar form of employment agreement.
Double Trigger Change of Control Agreements
We have entered into change of control agreements ("COC Agreements") with each of our current NEOs and certain other members of our Senior Management. Each COC Agreement has an initial two-year term, with an
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 59 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
automatic one- yearone-year extension on the second anniversary of the effective date (or any anniversary date thereafter) unless a cancellation notice is given at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then applicable term. Under the COC Agreements, we have an obligation to provide certain benefits to each NEO upon a qualifying termination event that occurs in connection with or within two years following a “change of control” of TETRA .TETRA. A qualifying termination event under the COC Agreements includes termination of the NEO’s employment by us other than for Cause (as that term is defined in the COC Agreements) or termination by the NEO for Good Reason (as that term is defined in the COC Agreements). For an overview of the specific terms and conditions of the NEOs' COC Agreements, please read the section titled "Potential Payments upon a Change of Control or Termination" below.
Each of our current directors and NEOs has executed an indemnification agreement that provides that we will indemnify these directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Amended and Restated Bylaws and applicable law. The indemnification agreement also provides that our directors and officers will be entitled to the advancement of fees as permitted by applicable law, and sets out the procedures required for determining entitlement to and obtaining indemnification and expense advancement. In addition, our charter documents provide that each of our directors and officers and any person serving at our request as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise is indemnified to the fullest extent permitted by law in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding (including civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative proceedings) arising out of or in connection with his or her services to us or to another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, at our request. We purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is a director or officer of the aforementioned corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him or her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as an officer or director. In addition, Messrs. Brightman and Serrano, in their capacities as directors and/or executive officers of CSI Compressco LP, have executed indemnification agreements with CSI Compressco LP that are substantially similar to the indemnification agreements executed by each of them in connection with their services to us.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a policy regarding stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers. The stock ownership guidelines provided under the policy are intended to align the interests of our directors
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)
and executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Under this policy, our executive officers must hold shares of our common stock equal to a multiple, based upon position, of their base salary. In addition, ownership of the common units of CSI Compressco LP counts toward fulfillment of the ownership requirement. The multiples applicable to our executive officers are as follows:
Chief Executive Officer, five-times base salary; Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, two-times base salary; and,
Senior Vice Presidents, General Counsel, and Vice Presidents, one-times base salary.
Newly elected officers and directors have five years from the date of appointment to achieve compliance with the policy.
As of the date of this report, subject to the transition period described above, all directorsofficers and officersdirectors are in compliance with the policy, with the exception of one executive officer who is not an NEO. Such executive officer received a two-year waiver of compliance with the guideline from our board in February 2018.policy.
Tax and Accounting Implications of Executive Compensation
Under Section 162(m) of the Code, publicly-held corporations generally may not take a tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1,000,000 in a year with respect to the corporation’s chief executive officer and other named executive officers. The former exception to this $1,000,000 limitation for performance-based compensation was repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Our analysis of the impact of the recent tax legislation on our ability to take such deductions in the future is still ongoing; however, we do not expect it to have a material impact on the structure of our compensation programs.
We may from time to timetime-to-time pay compensation to our executive officers that may not be deductible, including payments made under our Cash Incentive Compensation Plan,CICP, discretionary bonuses, and other types of compensation outside of our plans. Although tax deductibility is one of the Committee has generally attempted to structure executivefactors we consider in the design of our compensation so as to preserve deductibility, it also believesplans and programs, we believe that there are circumstances where our interests are best served by maintaining flexibilityproviding competitive compensation opportunities to our NEOs and other members of Senior Management, even if that results in the way compensation is provided.
In March 2018, in lightnon-deductibility of strengthening commodity prices and signs of an improving market forcertain amounts under the oil and gas industry, the Committee approved increases in the base salaries of our NEOs, with the exception of Mr. Pintar, who was no longer employed by us following the March 1, 2018 divestiture of our TOS business. The following increases were effective as of March 3, 2018:
Changes in 2018 Annual Base Salaries |
| |||||||
|
| Original Base Salary as of January 1, 2018 |
|
| Increased Base Salary Effective as of March 3, 2018 |
| ||
Stuart M. Brightman |
| $ | 625,000 |
|
| $ | 700,000 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 411,590 |
|
|
| 450,000 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 360,000 |
|
|
| 390,000 |
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 324,480 |
|
|
| 350,000 |
|
Peter J. Pintar(1) |
|
| 370,240 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
Code.
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee met fourfive times during the year ended December 31, 2017.2021. The Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon the review and discussions described above, the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statementProxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders.
Submitted by the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,
Thomas R. Bates, Jr., Chairman
John F. Glick
Stephen A. SniderSharon B. McGee
Kenneth E. White, Jr.Shawn D. Williams
This report of the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or be “filed” with the SEC subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically request that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Further, this report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference.
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 61 |
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Summary Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by (i) our Chief Executive Officer (“Principal Executive Officer”), (ii) our Chief Financial Officer (“Principal Financial Officer”), (iii) our former Sr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, who served in such positions for a portion of 2017, and (iv)(iii) each of our other three most highly compensated executive officers (each a “Named Executive Officer”), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2021.
Name and Principal |
| Salary(1) |
| Bonus |
|
| Stock Awards(2) |
| Option Awards(2) |
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Comp.(3) |
| All Other Comp.(4) |
| Total |
|
| Salary(1) |
| Bonus |
|
| Stock Awards(2) |
| Option Awards(2) |
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3) |
| All Other Compensation(4) |
| Total |
| ||||||||||||||
Position | Year | ($) |
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| Year | ($) |
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ||||||||||||||
Stuart M. Brightman(5) | 2017 | $ | 606,008 |
| $- |
|
| $ | 750,004 |
| $ | 638,827 |
| $ | 1,047,643 |
| $- |
| $ | 3,042,482 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brady M. Murphy | 2021 | $ | 589,615 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 1,975,810 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 1,680,798 |
| $ | 7,703 |
| $ | 4,253,926 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
President & CEO | 2016 |
| 535,095 |
| - |
|
|
| 1,250,009 |
| 625,001 |
| 525,000 |
| 16,460 |
| 2,951,565 |
| 2020 |
| 624,615 |
| - |
|
|
| 1,286,609 |
| - |
| - |
| 4,308 |
| 1,915,532 |
| ||||||||||
| 2015 |
| 624,998 |
| - |
|
|
| 1,468,057 |
| 584,025 |
| 1,425,354 |
| 17,704 |
| 4,120,138 |
| 2019 |
| 642,154 |
| - |
|
|
| 1,703,461 |
| - |
| 502,670 |
| 5,600 |
| 2,853,885 |
| ||||||||||
Elijio V. Serrano | 2017 | $ | 399,084 |
| $- |
|
| $ | 285,000 |
| $ | 285,000 |
| $ | 439,933 |
| $ | 877 |
| $ | 1,409,894 |
| 2021 | $ | 379,038 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 856,683 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 933,777 |
| $ | 3,584 |
| $ | 2,173,082 |
| |
Sr. Vice President & CFO | 2016 |
| 352,385 |
| - |
|
|
| 461,155 |
| 236,008 |
| 252,000 |
| 14,170 |
| 1,315,718 |
| 2020 |
| 401,538 |
| - |
|
|
| 509,790 |
| - |
| 96,520 |
| 4,154 |
| 1,012,002 |
| ||||||||||
| 2015 |
| 411,590 |
| - |
|
|
| 600,023 |
| 225,000 |
| 551,113 |
| 17,704 |
| 1,805,430 |
| 2019 |
| 450,000 |
| - |
|
|
| 511,193 |
| - |
| 475,686 |
| 8,400 |
| 1,445,279 |
| ||||||||||
Matthew J. Sanderson | 2017 | $ | 357,231 |
| $- |
|
| $ | 135,002 |
| $ | 135,001 |
| $ | 205,934 |
| $ | 97,049 |
| $ | 930,217 |
| 2021 | $ | 367,115 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 489,614 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 753,587 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 1,610,316 |
| |
Sr. Vice President | 2016 |
| 27,692 |
| 154,508 |
| (8) |
| 379,561 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 561,761 |
| 2020 |
| 370,308 |
| - |
|
|
| 299,832 |
| - |
| 50,800 |
| 5,108 |
| 726,048 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2019 |
| 405,385 |
| - |
|
|
| 358,682 |
| - |
| 303,315 |
| 8,400 |
| 1,075,782 |
| ||||||||||
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. | 2017 | $ | 314,621 |
| $- |
|
| $ | 139,052 |
| $ | 139,050 |
| $ | 245,583 |
| $- |
| $ | 838,306 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sr. Vice President & | 2016 |
| 277,805 |
| - |
|
|
| 224,996 |
| 115,147 |
| 113,568 |
| 12,860 |
| 744,376 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Counsel | 2015 |
| 324,480 |
| - |
|
|
| 381,774 |
| 115,876 |
| 341,282 |
| 17,328 |
| 1,180,740 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter J. Pintar | 2017 | $ | 358,990 |
| $- |
|
| $ | 112,502 |
| $ | 112,502 |
| $ | 205,928 |
| $ | 1,602 |
| $ | 791,524 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sr. Vice President | 2016 |
| 316,982 |
| - |
|
|
| 126,442 |
| 126,700 |
| 155,501 |
| 13,691 |
| 739,316 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timothy C. Moeller | 2021 | $ | 313,077 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 336,819 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 414,835 |
| $ | 2,727 |
| $ | 1,067,458 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sr Vice President | 2020 |
| 286,269 |
| - |
|
|
| 121,379 |
| - |
| - |
| 3,734 |
| 411,382 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 |
| 370,240 |
| - |
|
|
| 316,626 |
| 166,609 |
| 337,207 |
| 17,526 |
| 1,208,208 |
| 2019 |
| 300,000 |
| - |
|
|
| 134,488 |
| - |
| 86,172 |
| 9,500 |
| 530,160 |
| ||||||||||
Joseph Elkhoury | 2017 | $ | 423,184 |
| $- |
|
| $ | 345,001 |
| $ | 345,001 |
| $- |
| $ | 400,000 |
| $ | 1,513,186 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former Sr. Vice President & | 2016 |
| 385,269 |
| - |
|
|
| 509,696 |
| 260,852 |
| - |
| 14,582 |
| 1,170,399 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COO | 2015 |
| 450,000 |
| - |
|
|
| 377,325 |
| - |
| 368,280 |
| 70,325 |
| 1,265,930 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacek M. Mucha | 2021 | $ | 230,000 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 203,976 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 292,219 |
| $ | 2,684 |
| $ | 728,879 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
VP Finance & Treasurer | 2020 |
| 232,000 |
| - |
|
|
| 114,098 |
| - |
| - |
| 3,200 |
| 349,298 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 |
| 226,154 |
| - |
|
|
| 74,794 |
| - |
| 91,728 |
| 6,104 |
| 398,780 |
|
(1) |
|
(2) | The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, |
Name |
| Earned Portions of 2020 Performance Awards Paid in Immediately Vested Shares for Period Ending April 1, 2021 |
|
| Value of 3-Year Vesting Restricted Stock Units Granted Under 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards |
|
| Stock Awards |
| |||
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy |
| $ | 273,235 |
|
| $ | 1,702,575 |
|
| $ | 1,975,810 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 175,652 |
|
|
| 681,031 |
|
|
| 856,683 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 80,996 |
|
|
| 408,618 |
|
|
| 489,614 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller |
|
| 64,406 |
|
|
| 272,413 |
|
|
| 336,819 |
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
| 50,744 |
|
|
| 153,232 |
|
|
| 203,976 |
|
(3) | For |
Name |
| Earned Portions of 2020 Performance Awards Paid in Cash for Period Ending April 1, 2021 |
|
| Earned Amounts of Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Plan Awards for Year Ending Dec. 31, 2021 |
|
| Earned Amounts of Long-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentive Awards for 3-Year Period Ending Dec. 31, 2021 |
|
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation |
| ||||
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
| ||||
Brady M. Murphy |
| $ | 423,763 |
|
| $ | 383,035 |
|
| $ | 874,000 |
|
| $ | 1,680,798 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 272,419 |
|
|
| 186,358 |
|
|
| 475,000 |
|
|
| 933,777 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 329,044 |
|
|
| 174,543 |
|
|
| 250,000 |
|
|
| 753,587 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller |
|
| 261,649 |
|
|
| 153,186 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 414,835 |
| |
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
| 206,148 |
|
|
| 86,071 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 292,219 |
|
(4) | For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table discloses the actual number of TETRA stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock awardsRSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172021 to each Named Executive Officer, including the grant date fair value of these awards, and the threshold, target, and maximum amounts of annual cash incentives and long-term non-equity (cash) incentives granted to each Named Executive Officer.
Grants of Plan Based Awards Table
|
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|
|
| All Other Stock Awards: |
|
| All Other Option Awards: |
| Exercise |
| Grant Date Fair Value of Stock |
| |||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
|
|
| Number of Shares or Units(1) |
|
| Securities Underlying Options(2) |
| Price of Option Awards |
| and Option Awards(3) |
| |||||||
|
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
|
|
| (#) |
|
| (#) |
| ($/Share) |
| ($) |
| |||||||
Stuart M. Brightman | 2/22/2017 | $ | 225,000 |
| $ | 750,000 |
| $ | 1,500,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 | $ | 200,000 |
| $ | 1,000,000 |
| $ | 2,000,000 |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 166,298 |
|
|
| 233,702 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 1,226,756 |
|
| 8/9/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 133,946 |
|
|
|
| $ | 162,075 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano | 2/22/2017 | $ | 98,782 |
| $ | 329,272 |
| $ | 658,544 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 | $ | 76,000 |
| $ | 380,000 |
| $ | 760,000 |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63,193 |
|
|
| 139,706 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 570,001 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson | 2/22/2017 | $ | 64,800 |
| $ | 216,000 |
| $ | 432,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 | $ | 36,000 |
| $ | 180,000 |
| $ | 360,000 |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29,934 |
|
|
| 66,177 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 270,003 |
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. | 2/22/2017 | $ | 58,406 |
| $ | 194,688 |
| $ | 389,376 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 | $ | 37,080 |
| $ | 185,400 |
| $ | 370,800 |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30,832 |
|
|
| 68,162 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 278,103 |
|
Peter J. Pintar | 2/22/2017 | $ | 66,643 |
| $ | 222,144 |
| $ | 444,288 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 | $ | 30,000 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 300,000 |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24,945 |
|
|
| 55,148 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 225,004 |
|
Joseph Elkhoury | 2/22/2017 | $ | 108,000 |
| $ | 360,000 |
| $ | 720,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 | $ | 92,000 |
| $ | 460,000 |
| $ | 920,000 |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/22/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76,497 |
|
|
| 169,118 |
| $ | 4.51 |
| $ | 690,002 |
|
|
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|
| All Other Stock Awards: |
|
| All Other Option Awards: | Exercise | Grant Date |
| |||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
|
| Number of Shares of Stock or Units(1) |
|
| Number of Securities Underlying Options | or Base Price of Option Awards | Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(2) |
| |||||
|
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
|
| (#) |
|
| (#) | ($/Share) | ($) |
| |||||
Brady M. Murphy | 2/17/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 647,367 |
|
|
|
| $ | 1,702,575 |
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 236,250 |
| $ | 787,500 |
| $ | 1,575,000 |
| (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | - |
| $ | 625,000 |
| $ | 1,250,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 187,500 |
| $ | 625,000 |
| $ | 1,250,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano | 2/17/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 258,947 |
|
|
|
| $ | 681,031 |
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 121,500 |
| $ | 405,000 |
| $ | 810,000 |
| (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | - |
| $ | 250,000 |
| $ | 500,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 75,000 |
| $ | 250,000 |
| $ | 500,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson | 2/17/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 155,368 |
|
|
|
| $ | 408,618 |
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 87,150 |
| $ | 290,500 |
| $ | 581,000 |
| (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | - |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 300,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 45,000 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 300,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C. Moeller | 2/17/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 103,579 |
|
|
|
| $ | 272,413 |
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 79,800 |
| $ | 266,000 |
| $ | 532,000 |
| (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | - |
| $ | 100,000 |
| $ | 200,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 30,000 |
| $ | 100,000 |
| $ | 200,000 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek M. Mucha | 2/17/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58,263 |
|
|
|
| $ | 153,232 |
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 39,000 |
| $ | 130,000 |
| $ | 260,000 |
| (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | - |
| $ | 56,250 |
| $ | 112,500 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/17/2021 | $ | 16,875 |
| $ | 56,250 |
| $ | 112,500 |
| (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
| The amounts reported are the number of |
| The dollar amount reported reflects the fair value on the date of grant |
| The non-equity incentive plan |
| The non-equity incentive plan |
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 63 |
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table shows certain information regarding outstanding stock option awards and restricted stock unit awards (RSUs) granted under the TETRA equity plans and outstanding phantom unit awards and performance phantom unit awards granted under the CSI Compressco equity plan, all as of December 31, 2017.2021.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
|
| Option Awards |
| Stock or Unit Awards |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options |
|
|
| Option Exercise |
|
| Option Expiration |
| Number of Shares of Stock or Units that Have Not |
|
|
| Market Value of Shares of Stock or Units that Have Not |
|
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units that Have Not |
|
|
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value or Payout Value of Unearned Units that Have Not |
| ||||||||||
Name |
| Exercisable |
|
| Unexercisable |
|
|
| Price(1) |
|
| Date |
| Vested |
|
|
| Vested(2) |
|
| Vested(3) |
|
|
| Vested(3) |
| |||||||
|
| (#) |
|
| (#) |
|
|
| ($/Share) |
|
|
|
| (#) |
|
|
| ($) |
|
| (#) |
|
|
| ($) |
| |||||||
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 77,000 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 21.10 |
|
| 5/20/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 100,000 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 3.78 |
|
| 2/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 52,150 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 10.20 |
|
| 5/20/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 54,873 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 13.00 |
|
| 5/20/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 78,480 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 6.81 |
|
| 5/20/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 91,055 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 10.30 |
|
| 5/20/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 87,210 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 11.16 |
|
| 5/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 158,646 |
|
|
| 25,589 |
| (4) |
| $ | 7.15 |
|
| 5/4/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 104,387 |
|
|
| 93,398 |
| (5) |
| $ | 7.14 |
|
| 5/2/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart M. Brightman |
| — |
|
|
| 233,702 |
| (6) |
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
| — |
|
|
| 133,946 |
| (7) |
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13,614 |
| (8) |
| $ | 58,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43,768 |
| (9) |
| $ | 186,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 166,298 |
| (10) |
| $ | 710,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13,697 |
| (11) |
| $ | 74,923 |
|
|
| 74,761 |
| (12) |
| $ | 408,943 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 79,051 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 6.60 |
|
| 8/15/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 29,646 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 10.30 |
|
| 5/20/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 41,860 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 11.16 |
|
| 5/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 61,120 |
|
|
| 9,858 |
| (4) |
| $ | 7.15 |
|
| 5/4/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 39,418 |
|
|
| 35,268 |
| (5) |
| $ | 7.14 |
|
| 5/2/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| — |
|
|
| 139,706 |
| (6) |
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5,245 |
| (8) |
| $ | 22,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,493 |
| (9) |
| $ | 70,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63,193 |
| (10) |
| $ | 269,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6,984 |
| (11) |
| $ | 38,202 |
|
|
| 26,989 |
| (12) |
| $ | 147,630 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| — |
|
|
| 66,177 |
| (6) |
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 67,179 |
| (13) |
| $ | 286,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29,934 |
| (10) |
| $ | 127,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 50,000 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 21.10 |
|
| 5/20/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 56,000 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 3.78 |
|
| 2/12/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 17,000 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 10.20 |
|
| 5/20/2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 14,872 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 13.00 |
|
| 5/20/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 21,365 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 6.81 |
|
| 5/20/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 19,664 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 10.30 |
|
| 5/20/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 18,866 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 11.16 |
|
| 5/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 31,477 |
|
|
| 5,077 |
| (4) |
| $ | 7.15 |
|
| 5/4/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 19,232 |
|
|
| 17,207 |
| (5) |
| $ | 7.14 |
|
| 5/2/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
| — |
|
|
| 68,162 |
| (6) |
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,701 |
| (8) |
| $ | 11,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,047 |
| (9) |
| $ | 34,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30,832 |
| (10) |
| $ | 131,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6,984 |
| (11) |
| $ | 38,202 |
|
|
| 13,168 |
| (12) |
| $ | 72,029 |
|
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 24,926 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 6.81 |
|
| 5/20/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 22,437 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 10.30 |
|
| 5/20/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 25,829 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | 11.16 |
|
| 5/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 45,258 |
|
|
| 7,300 |
| (4) |
| $ | 7.15 |
|
| 5/4/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 21,161 |
|
|
| 18,934 |
| (5) |
| $ | 7.14 |
|
| 5/2/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Pintar |
| — |
|
|
| 55,148 |
| (6) |
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,884 |
| (8) |
| $ | 16,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Pintar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,854 |
| (9) |
| $ | 37,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
| Option Awards |
| Stock or Unit Awards |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options |
|
|
| Option Exercise |
|
| Option Expiration |
| Number of Shares of Stock or Units that Have Not |
|
|
| Market Value of Shares of Stock or Units that Have Not |
|
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units that Have Not |
|
|
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value or Payout Value of Unearned Units that Have Not |
| ||||||||||
Name |
| Exercisable |
|
| Unexercisable |
|
|
| Price(1) |
|
| Date |
| Vested |
|
|
| Vested(2) |
|
| Vested(3) |
|
|
| Vested(3) |
| |||||||
|
| (#) |
|
| (#) |
|
|
| ($/Share) |
|
|
|
| (#) |
|
|
| ($) |
|
| (#) |
|
|
| ($) |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24,945 |
| (10) |
| $ | 106,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6,984 |
| (11) |
| $ | 38,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Option Awards |
| Stock or Unit Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options |
| Option |
|
| Option |
| Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have |
|
| Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have |
|
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units that Have |
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value or Payout of Value of Unearned Units that Have | |||||||
Name | Exercisable |
|
| Unexercisable |
| Exercise Price(1) |
|
| Expiration Date |
| Not Vested |
|
| Not Vested(2) |
|
| Not Vested |
| Not Vested | ||||
| (#) |
|
| (#) |
| ($/Share) |
|
|
|
| (#) |
|
| ($) |
|
| (#) |
| ($) | ||||
Brady M. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53,810 |
| (3) | $ | 152,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brady M. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 407,415 |
| (4) | $ | 1,157,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brady M. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 268,582 |
| (5) | $ | 762,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brady M. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 647,367 |
| (6) | $ | 1,838,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brady M. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 79,051 |
|
|
|
| $ | 6.60 |
|
| 8/15/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 29,646 |
|
|
|
| $ | 10.30 |
|
| 5/20/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 41,860 |
|
|
|
| $ | 11.16 |
|
| 5/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 70,978 |
|
|
|
| $ | 7.15 |
|
| 5/4/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 74,686 |
|
|
|
| $ | 7.14 |
|
| 5/2/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 139,706 |
|
|
|
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| 98,056 |
|
|
|
| $ | 3.87 |
|
| 2/22/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34,080 |
| (3) | $ | 96,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 106,419 |
| (5) | $ | 302,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 258,947 |
| (6) | $ | 735,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| 66,177 |
|
|
|
| $ | 4.51 |
|
| 2/22/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| 51,609 |
|
|
|
| $ | 3.87 |
|
| 2/22/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17,937 |
| (3) | $ | 50,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40,742 |
| (4) | $ | 115,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 105,575 |
| (5) | $ | 299,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 155,368 |
| (6) | $ | 441,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C Moeller |
| 16,618 |
|
|
|
| $ | 4.19 |
|
| 5/4/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C Moeller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,485 |
| (3) | $ | 12,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C Moeller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30,557 |
| (4) | $ | 86,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C Moeller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25,338 |
| (5) | $ | 71,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy C Moeller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 103,579 |
| (6) | $ | 294,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,153 |
| (3) | $ | 6,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31,027 |
| (7) | $ | 88,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23,819 |
| (5) | $ | 67,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58,263 |
| (6) | $ | 165,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Under the terms of the TETRA equity plans, the option exercise price must be greater than or equal to 100% of the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant. |
(2) | Market value of awards granted under the TETRA equity plans is determined by multiplying the number of shares of stock that have not vested by |
(3) |
|
(4) | The |
(5) |
|
(6) | One-third of the |
(7) |
|
|
| |
64 I TETRA | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth certain information regarding TETRA stock options and stock awards exercised and vested, respectively, under the TETRA equity plans, and phantom unit awards vested under the CSI Compressco LP Second Amended and Restated 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan by each of our Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2021.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
|
| Option Awards |
|
| Stock Awards |
| ||||||||||
Name |
| Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise |
|
| Value Realized on Exercise |
|
| Number of Shares or Units Acquired on Vesting |
|
| Value Realized on Vesting |
| ||||
|
| (#) |
|
| ($) |
|
| (#) |
|
| ($) |
| ||||
Stuart M. Brightman |
| — |
|
| $ | - |
|
|
| 79,396 |
|
| $ | 248,475 |
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
| — |
|
| $ | - |
|
|
| 31,016 |
|
| $ | 97,322 |
| |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| — |
|
| $ | - |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
| — |
|
| $ | - |
|
|
| 15,267 |
|
| $ | 47,827 |
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| — |
|
| $ | - |
|
|
| 19,111 |
|
| $ | 59,837 |
|
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
| — |
|
| $ | - |
|
|
| 115,685 |
|
| $ | 392,916 |
|
|
| Option Awards |
|
| Stock Awards |
| ||||||||
Name |
| Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise |
| Value Realized on Exercise |
|
| Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting |
|
| Value Realized on Vesting |
| |||
|
| (#) |
| ($) |
|
| (#) |
|
| ($) |
| |||
Brady M. Murphy(1) |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
|
| 862,459 |
|
| $ | 1,936,489 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano(1) |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
|
| 487,700 |
|
| $ | 1,138,634 |
|
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
|
| 179,124 |
|
| $ | 482,268 |
|
Timothy C. Moeller(1) |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
|
| 86,181 |
|
| $ | 198,964 |
|
Jacek M. Mucha(1) |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
|
| 82,883 |
|
| $ | 205,837 |
|
(1) | ||
|
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Nonqualified DeferredDeferred Compensation
The following table discloses contributions, earnings, and balances for each of the Named Executive Officers under the TETRA Technologies, Inc. Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan, as of December 31, 2017.2021. None of our current NEOs participates in this plan.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
Name |
| Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year |
|
| Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year |
|
| Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year |
|
| Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions |
|
| Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End |
| |||||
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
| |||||
Stuart M. Brightman(1) |
| $ | 54,541 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 386,977 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 2,205,846 |
|
Elijio V. Serrano |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |||||
Matthew J. Sanderson |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |||||
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 10,403 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 84,154 |
| |||
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| Executive Contributions in Fiscal Year | Registrant Contributions in Fiscal Year | Aggregate Earnings in Fiscal Year | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End | ||||||||||||||
($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ||||||||||||||||
Brady M. Murphy | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Elijio V. Serrano | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Sanderson | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Timothy C. Moeller | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Jacek M. Mucha | — | — | — | — | — |
The Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan is an unfunded deferred compensation plan pursuant to which the Named Executive Officers and non-employee directors may elect to participate. The Named Executive Officers may elect to defer up to 100% of their base salary and performance-based cash incentive compensation. Deferral elections as to annual base salary are due by mid-December, and are effective as of January 1 of the succeeding year. Deferral elections for cash incentive compensation may be made in the December enrollment period, or in a mid-year enrollment period. Deferrals are held for each participant in separate individual accounts in a rabbi trust. Deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses depending upon the participant’s deemed investment elections from among hypothetical investment election options which are made available. All hypothetical investments are our unfunded obligations. Deferral contributions made by the participant and earnings credited to such contributions are 100% vested. A deferral period and payment date must be irrevocably specified at election for each deferral. In-service distributions may not be withdrawn until two years following the participant’s initial enrollment. Notwithstanding the participant’s deferral election, the participant will receive distribution of his deferral account upon termination of employment or service, as applicable, or upon disability or death. Hardship withdrawals are permitted for unforeseeable emergencies. In the event the Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan is terminated within twelve months of a change in control, the deferred amounts will become payable to each participant.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 65 |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
With the exception of the Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. Elkhoury, asAs of the date of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, we do not have a defined severance plan for, or any agreement with, any Named Executive Officer that would require us to make any termination payments. We have previously entered into employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers that are substantially identical to the form of agreement executed by all of our employees. These agreements evidence the at-will nature of employment, and do not guarantee term of employment, salary, severance or change in control payments.
In addition, we have entered into change of control agreements ("COC Agreements")Agreements with each of our NEOs and other members of our senior management.Senior Management. The COC Agreements have an initial two-year term, with an automatic one-year extension on the second anniversary of the effective date (or any anniversary date thereafter) unless a cancellation notice is given at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then applicable term. Under the COC Agreements, we have an obligation to provide certain benefits to each Named Executive Officer upon a qualifying termination event that occurs in connection with or within two years following a “change of control” of TETRA. A qualifying termination event under the COC Agreements includes termination of the Named Executive Officer's employment by us other than for Cause (as that term is defined in the COC Agreements) or termination by the Named Executive Officer for Good Reason (as that term is defined in the COC Agreements).
For purposes of the COC Agreements, the following terms generally mean:
“Cause” means a willful breach in any material respect, a conviction (or plea of guilty or nolo contendere) by a court for any felony, or with respect to employment, for a crime involving fraud, embezzlement, dishonesty, or moral turpitude, a failure to substantially follow the reasonable and lawful written instructions or policies of the Board or us, the willful failure to render material services to us, which results in a material neglect of duties.
“Good Reason” means an occurrence of any of the following without the NEO’s written consent: (i) a material diminution in authority, duties, or responsibilities; (ii) a material diminution in base salary, target annual or long-term bonus opportunity, or employee benefits; (iii) a required relocation of more than 50 miles; (iv) our failure to obtain an assumption of the COC Agreements by any successor entity; or, (iv) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by us.
“Change of Control” will be deemed to have occurred upon any of the following events: (i) any person other than us and certain related entities acquiring beneficial ownership of more than 50% of our outstanding shares; (ii) the consummation of a merger or other business combination or reorganization that results in our stockholders prior to any such change owning more than 50% of the voting securities of the surviving entity; (iii) the consummation of the sale or disposition by us of substantially all of our assets, unless such sale or disposition results in our stockholders prior to owning more than 50% of the voting securities of the acquiror; (iv) the approval by our stockholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution; or, (v) the individuals that constitute a majority of our Board cease for any reason to constitute a majority of our Board.
Under the COC Agreements, if a qualifying termination event occurs in connection with or within two years following a change of control, we have an obligation to pay to each Named Executive Officer the following cash severance
|
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
amounts: (i)(A) an amount equal to the Named Executive Officer's earned but unpaid Annual Bonus (as that term is defined in the COC Agreement) attributable to the immediately preceding calendar year and earned but unpaid Long Term Bonus (as that term is defined in the COC Agreement) attributable to the performance period ended as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar to the extent such amounts would have been paid to the Named Executive Officer had the Named Executive Officer remained employed by us, and in each case only to the extent the performance goals for each such bonus were achieved for the respective performance period, plus (B) the Named Executive Officer's prorated target Annual Bonus for the current year, plus (C) an amount equal to the Named Executive Officer's target Long Term Bonus for each outstanding award; plus (ii) the product of 2.99, in the case of Mr. Brightman,Murphy, or 2, in the case of the other Named Executive Officers, times the sum of the Named Executive Officer's Base Salary and target Annual Bonus amount for the year in which the qualifying termination event occurs; plus (iii) an amount equal to the aggregate premiums and any administrative fees applicable to the Named Executive Officer due to an election of continuation of coverage that the Named Executive Officer would be required to pay if the Named Executive Officer elected to continue medical and dental benefits under our group health plan for the Named Executive Officer and the Named Executive Officer's eligible dependents without subsidy from us for a period of two years following the date of a qualifying termination of the Named Executive Officer's employment. The Agreement also provides for full acceleration of any outstanding stock options, restricted stock units awards (RSUs), and other stock-based awards upon a qualifying termination of the Named Executive Officer's employment to the extent permitted under the applicable plan. All payments and benefits due under the COC Agreement are conditioned upon the execution and nonrevocation by the Named Executive Officer of a release for our benefit. All
66 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
payments under the COC Agreement are subject to reduction as may be necessary to avoid exceeding the amount allowed under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The COC Agreements also contain certain confidentiality provisions and related restrictions applicable to the NEOs. In addition to restrictions upon improper disclosure and use of Confidential Information (as defined in the COC Agreement), each Named Executive Officer agrees that for a period of two years following a termination of employment for any reason, such Named Executive Officer will not solicit our employees or otherwise engage in a competitive business with us as more specifically set forth in the COC Agreement. Such obligations are only applicable to the Named Executive Officer if he receives the severance benefits described above.
Under the CSI Compressco LPTETRA Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 20112007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, the CSI Compressco Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the vesting of phantom units and performance phantom units held by plan participants upon termination of their employment. Similarly, under the TETRA Technologies, Inc. Third Amended and Restated 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, and the First Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors may accelerate the vesting of stock options, restricted stock awards,RSUs, and other equity-based awards held by plan participants at its sole discretion. The following table quantifies the potential payments to Named Executive Officers who were employed by us as of December 31, 2017,2021, under the contracts, agreements or plans discussed above in various scenarios involving a change of control or termination of employment, assuming a December 31, 20172021 termination date. In addition to the amounts reflected in the table, the Named Executive Officers would receive upon termination any salary earned through December 31, 2017,2021, and any benefits they would otherwise be entitled to under our 401(k) Plan and Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan.
Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. Elkhoury. On June 1, 2017, in connection with his resignation from the positions of Sr. Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, we entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Elkhoury, pursuant to which Mr. Elkhoury remained employed by us and provided transition services to us through November 30, 2017. The Separation Agreement contains a confidentiality provision and imposes other obligations on Mr. Elkhoury that are applicable before and after his effective separation date. In addition, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Separation Agreement, Mr. Elkhoury received a lump sum payment of $400,000, less legally required withholdings, on June 6, 2017. Upon termination of Mr. Elkhoury’s employment, the remaining unvested shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to his inducement award became fully vested and were no longer subject to forfeiture. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement and as a result of Mr. Elkhoury continuing his employment with us through November 30, 2017, (a) 12,124 shares of unvested restricted stock awarded to Mr. Elkhoury in 2017 became fully vested and no longer subject to forfeiture, and (b) Mr. Elkhoury received a cash payment of $180,000 on March 16, 2018. Mr. Elkhoury also received payment or waiver of any contribution that would otherwise be required from him for continuing to receive coverage for medical, prescription, and dental benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, through the date of Mr. Elkhoury’s commencement of other employment through which he became eligible for such benefits.
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 67 |
|
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control Table
Name |
| Cash Severance Payment(1) |
|
| Bonus Payment(2) |
|
| Accelerated Exercisability of Unvested Options(3) |
|
| Accelerated Vesting of Shares or Units(4) |
|
| Continuation of Health Benefits |
|
| Total |
|
| Cash Severance Payment |
|
| Bonus Payment |
|
| Accelerated Exercisability of Unvested Options(3) |
|
| Accelerated Vesting of Shares or Units(3) |
|
| Continuation of Health Benefits |
|
| Total |
| ||||||||||||
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brady M. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Death/disability |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 1,440,456 |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 1,440,456 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 3,801,000 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 3,801,000 |
|
Retirement |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,440,456 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,440,456 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,801,000 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,801,000 |
| ||||||||
Termination for cause |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination for no cause or good reason |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination upon a change of control |
|
| 4,111,250 |
|
|
| 2,672,643 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,440,456 |
|
|
| 55,461 |
|
|
| 8,279,810 |
|
|
| 4,238,325 |
| (1) |
| 5,112,500 |
| (2) | — |
|
|
| 3,801,000 |
|
|
| 47,233 |
|
|
| 13,199,058 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death/disability |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 548,487 |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 548,487 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1,102,471 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1,102,471 |
|
Retirement |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 548,487 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 548,487 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,102,471 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,102,471 |
| ||||||||
Termination for cause |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination for no cause or good reason |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination upon a change of control |
|
| 1,481,724 |
|
|
| 1,057,433 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 548,487 |
|
|
| 34,187 |
|
|
| 3,121,831 |
|
|
| 1,620,000 |
| (1) |
| 1,905,000 |
| (2) | — |
|
|
| 1,102,471 |
|
|
| 28,943 |
|
|
| 4,656,414 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death/disability |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 414,673 |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 414,673 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 882,157 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 882,157 |
|
Retirement |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 414,673 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 414,673 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 882,157 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 882,157 |
| ||||||||
Termination for cause |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination for no cause or good reason |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination upon a change of control |
|
| 1,152,000 |
|
|
| 385,928 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 414,673 |
|
|
| 44,478 |
|
|
| 1,997,079 |
|
|
| 1,411,000 |
| (1) |
| 1,153,000 |
| (2) | — |
|
|
| 882,157 |
|
|
| 38,276 |
|
|
| 3,484,433 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timothy C. Moeller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Death/disability |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 287,778 |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 287,778 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 452,527 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 452,527 |
|
Retirement |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 287,778 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 287,778 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 452,527 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 452,527 |
| ||||||||
Termination for cause |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination for no cause or good reason |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination upon a change of control |
|
| 1,038,336 |
|
|
| 546,858 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 287,778 |
|
|
| 48,139 |
|
|
| 1,921,111 |
|
|
| 1,292,000 |
| (1) |
| 653,500 |
| (2) | — |
|
|
| 452,527 |
|
|
| 31,489 |
|
|
| 2,429,516 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter J. Pintar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Death/disability |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 199,108 |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 199,108 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 318,123 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 318,123 |
|
Retirement |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 199,108 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 199,108 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 318,123 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 318,123 |
| ||||||||
Termination for cause |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||||||
Termination for no cause or good reason |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |||||||
Termination upon a change of control |
|
| 1,184,768 |
|
|
| 525,928 |
|
| — |
|
|
| 199,108 |
|
|
| 48,139 |
|
|
| 1,957,943 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 318,123 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 318,123 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Separation Agreement(5) |
| $ | 400,000 |
|
| $ | 180,000 |
|
| — |
|
| $ | 48,739 |
|
| $ | 8,023 |
|
| $ | 636,762 |
|
(1) | Amounts shown are a multiple of base salary plus target annual cash bonus, as provided under the terms of the COC Agreements. |
(2) | Includes |
(3) | The TETRA |
Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, requires us to disclose the annual total compensation of Mr. Murphy, our CEO, and our median employee, as well as the ratio of their respective annual total compensation to each other (in each case, with annual total compensation calculated in accordance with SEC rules applicable to the Summary Compensation Table). For 2021:
68 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
•Median employee’s total compensation | $90,722 |
•Mr. Murphy’s total annual compensation | $4,253,926 |
•Ratio of CEO to median employee compensation | 46.9 : 1 |
We used a consistently applied compensation measure to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees, and to determine the annual total compensation of our CEO. To make them comparable, salaries for newly hired employees who had worked less than a year were annualized, and the target annual bonus amount was applied to their total compensation measure. To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees and the median employee’s compensation, we took the following steps:
We determined that our employee population as of December 31, 2021 consisted of 1,136 full- and part-time employees located in 14 countries (we do not have temporary or seasonal workers).
We selected December 31, 2021 as our identification date for determining our median employee because it enabled us to make such identification in a reasonably efficient and economic matter.
For our international employees paid in their local currency, we converted each such employee’s total annual compensation as of December 31, 2021 to U.S. dollars; however, we did not make any cost of living adjustment with respect to any of our U.S. or international employees.
The CEO pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in accordance with SEC rules and methods for disclosure. Due to estimates, assumptions, and adjustments, as well as significantly varying workforce structures, CEO pay ratios reported by other companies are not likely to be comparable to our CEO pay ratio.
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
The Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee (the “HCMCC”) of our Board of Directors reviews and evaluates potential risks related to the design of our compensation programs. In its evaluation of our annual and long-term incentive compensation plans that were in effect during 2017,2021, as well as the incentive compensation arrangements proposed for 20182022 as described above, the Compensation CommitteeHCMCC determined that such plans are designed with the appropriate balance of risk and reward relative to our overall business strategy. In addition, the stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers encourage them to focus on the creation of long-term value for stockholders rather than short-term results.
Specifically, under our Cash Incentive Compensation Plan,CICP, the amount of each participant’s prospective payment, for both annual and long-term awards, is established as a percentage of annual base salary, and is contingent on performance, including the attainment of targeted levels of performance that include both financial and nonfinancial measures. With respect to long-term Cash Incentive Compensation Plan,CICP, attainment of targeted levels of performance is measured over two or more years. Notwithstanding the attainment of any established performance measures, the amount of the annual or long-term cash incentive payment received by any participant is subject to the ultimate discretion of the Compensation Committee.HCMCC. Further, annual and long-term cash awards are paid only after the Compensation CommitteeHCMCC has reviewed our audited financial statements for the applicable performance period.
Long-term equity incentive awards typically consist of stock options, restricted stock, and/or CSI Compressco phantom unitsRSUs that generally vest ratably over a three-year period, and/or CSI Compressco performance phantom units that vest at the end of a performance period. The recipients of such awards can realize an increase in the value of their long-term equity awards only to the extent that our investors benefit from an increase in the market price for our common stock or the CSI Compressco units.
stock.
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
During the period from March 1, 2016 until March 31, 2017, the Board of Directors voluntarily agreed to reductions in the annual retainers and meeting fees paid in cash in order to align with our employee wage and salary reductions that were in effect during that time. These reductions ended March 31, 2017 and the board compensation structure that was in effect prior to the reductions was reinstated at that time.
The key terms of our non-managementindependent director compensation include the following:
|
| |
Board Annual Retainer paid to all non-employee directors except Chairman of the Board (paid in cash) | ● |
|
Non-Executive Chairman Annual Retainer (paid in cash) |
| ● $132,000; paid in monthly installments |
Committee Chair Annual Retainers (paid in cash) | ● Audit Committee - ● Human Capital Management and Compensation
|
●
|
|
|
|
Annual Equity Award |
| ● Annual award value of $100,000 granted in ● Annual awards granted on the date of TETRA’s Annual Stockholder Meeting |
Other | ● All non-employee directors, including Mr. Sullivan, are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board or its committees and related activities, including director education courses and materials. ● Directors who are also our officers or employees do not receive any compensation for duties performed as directors |
Effective April 1, 2020, the Board of Directors voluntarily agreed to a 20% reduction in the annual retainers and meeting fees paid in cash described above to align with our employee wage and salary reductions. Effective August 1, 2021, the Board of Directors reinstated the cash retainers paid to the non-employee directors of the Company. Effective July 1, 2021, the Board of Directors amended its non-employee director compensation guidelines to increase the annual cash retainer from $50,000 to $70,000 (unreduced) and eliminate all meeting fees. |
|
On May 4, 2017,26, 2021, each non-employee director as of that date, including Mr. Sullivan, received an award of 32,363 shares of restricted stock31,216 RSUs with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $100,002. Twenty-five$112,065.44. One hundred percent of the shares of restricted stockRSUs so awarded vestedwill vest on the date of grant, and additional 25% portionsone-year anniversary of the award vested on August 4 and November 4, 2017 and February 4, 2018.grant date (May 26, 2022). It is anticipated that future compensation arrangements approved by the board will include awards of grants of approximately $100,000 in value of restricted stockRSUs to each Non-employee Directornon-employee director on an annual basis, to be awarded in conjunction with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in May of each year.
|
|
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
In addition, on February 23, 2017, eachOn March 31, 2021, in connection with his appointment as a member of the non-employee directors were granted shares of bonus stock pursuant to the TETRA Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan to compensate for awards of restricted stock granted, with respect to Messrs. Baldwin, Bates, Coombs, Glick, Sullivan, and White on May 4, 2015, with respect to Mr. Snider on August 13, 2015, and with respect to Mr. Winkler on August 29, 2015, that were subsequently determined by our Board of Directors, Mr. Williams received an award of 5,115 immediately vested RSUs with a grant date fair market value of $12,276, representing the prorated portion of the annual equity award to have been nullnon-employee directors for the term of his service between his date of appointment and void.May 26, 2021, the date of the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Williams’ prorated award fully vested on the date of grant.
Under the Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan, each director may elect to defer the receipt of up to 100% of the cash compensation paid to such director by making an irrevocable deferral election. Deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses depending on the participant’s deemed investment elections from among hypothetical investment election options which are made available. All hypothetical investments are our unfunded obligations. Deferral contributions made by the participant and earnings credited to such contributions are 100% vested.
The following table discloses the cash, equity awards, and other compensation earned, paid, or awarded, as the case may be, to each of our Non-employee Directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2021.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 71 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation Table
Name |
| Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
|
| Stock Awards(1) |
|
| Option Awards |
|
| All Other Compensation |
|
| Total |
|
| Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
|
| Stock Awards (1) |
|
| All Other Compensation |
|
| Total |
| |||||||||
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
|
| ($) |
| |||||||||
Mark E. Baldwin |
| $ | 84,487.53 |
|
| $ | 163,782.72 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| 248,270.25 |
|
| $ | 82,183 |
|
| $ | 112,065 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 194,248 |
|
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
|
| 75,795.03 |
|
|
| 163,782.72 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 239,577.75 |
|
|
| 80,983 |
|
|
| 112,065 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 193,048 |
|
Paul D. Coombs |
|
| 74,415.03 |
|
|
| 163,782.72 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 238,197.75 |
|
|
| 32,929 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 32,929 |
|
John F. Glick |
|
| 80,010.03 |
|
|
| 163,782.72 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 243,792.75 |
|
|
| 79,133 |
|
|
| 112,065 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 191,198 |
|
Stephen A. Snider (3) |
|
| 68,986.03 |
|
|
| 147,457.92 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 216,442.95 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Gina Luna |
|
| 71,833 |
|
|
| 112,065 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 183,898 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Sullivan |
|
| 125,730.00 |
|
|
| 163,782.72 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 237,267.75 |
|
|
| 116,600 |
|
|
| 112,065 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 228,665 |
|
Kenneth E. White, Jr. (2) |
|
| 73,485.03 |
|
|
| 163,782.72 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 237,267.75 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Shawn D. Williams |
|
| 48,633 |
|
|
| 124,341 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 172,974 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph C. Winkler, III |
|
| 70,200.03 |
|
|
| 143,499.51 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 213,699.50 |
|
|
| 32,929 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 32,929 |
|
(1) | On May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Our health insurance plan permits directors who were former employees of TETRA to participate in our health plan. Mr. Coombs |
(3) | Fees earned or paid in cash for Messrs. Coombs and Winkler represent compensation earned for service as a director from January 1, 2021 through May 26, 2021, respectively, at which time each of them retired from service as a director. Neither Mr. Coombs nor Mr. Winkler received an equity award during 2021. |
|
|
|
|
|
BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIPOWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 2017,2021, with respect to each person that beneficially owns five percent (5%) or more of our common stock, and as of March 5, 201828, 2022 with respect to (i) our directors; (ii) our Named Executive Officers; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group.
Name and Business Address of Beneficial Owner |
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
| Percentage of Class |
| ||
5% Stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Inc. |
|
| 9,698,246 |
| (1) |
| 7.60 | % |
Jack Yetiv |
|
| 8,120,000 |
| (2) |
| 6.40 | % |
Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. |
|
| 7,567,217 |
| (3) |
| 5.96 | % |
Directors, Director Nominees and NEOs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Baldwin |
|
| 244,806 |
| (4) | * |
| |
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
|
| 439,260 |
| (4) | * |
| |
John F. Glick |
|
| 396,838 |
| (4) | * |
| |
Gina A. Luna |
|
| 224,034 |
| (4) | * |
| |
Sharon B. McGee |
|
| 9,946 |
| (5) | * |
| |
Brady M. Murphy |
|
| 1,546,122 |
| (6) |
| 1.21 | % |
William D. Sullivan |
|
| 233,369 |
| (4) | * |
| |
Shawn D. Williams |
|
| 36,331 |
| (4) | * |
| |
Timothy C. Moeller |
|
| 155,707 |
| (7) | * |
| |
Jacek M. Mucha |
|
| 70,540 |
|
| * |
| |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 540,087 |
| (8) | * |
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 1,424,741 |
| (9) |
| 1.12 | % |
All Executive Officers, Directors and Director Nominees as a group (14 persons) |
|
| 5,648,574 |
| (10) |
| 4.43 | % |
Name and Business Address of Beneficial Owner |
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
| Percentage of Class |
| ||
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
| 15,089,690 |
| (1) |
| 13.0 | % |
55 East 52nd Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
|
| 9,257,520 |
| (2) |
| 7.90 | % |
100 E. Pratt Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland 21202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
|
| 8,759,343 |
| (3) |
| 7.55 | % |
100 Vanguard Blvd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. |
|
| 8,081,075 |
| (4) |
| 6.8 | % |
401 Borel Way, Suite 300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Mateo, California 94402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR LLC |
|
| 6,558,671 |
| (5) |
| 5.64 | % |
245 Summer Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP |
|
| 5,956,819 |
| (6) |
| 5.14 | % |
6300 Bee Cave Road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, Texas 78746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Baldwin |
|
| 72,308 |
|
| * |
| |
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
|
| 108,830 |
|
| * |
| |
Stuart M. Brightman |
|
| 2,109,490 |
| (7) |
| 1.7 | % |
Paul D. Coombs |
|
| 751,338 |
|
| * |
| |
John F. Glick |
|
| 91,408 |
|
| * |
| |
Stephen A. Snider |
|
| 56,659 |
|
| * |
| |
William D. Sullivan |
|
| 167,410 |
|
| * |
| |
Kenneth E. White, Jr. |
|
| 143,410 |
|
| * |
| |
Joseph C. Winkler III |
|
| 55,791 |
|
| * |
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 917,430 |
| (8) | * |
| |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| 172,383 |
| (9) | * |
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 513,980 |
| (10) | * |
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 363,285 |
| (11) | * |
| |
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
| 317,306 |
| (12) | * |
| |
Directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) |
|
| 7,144,226 |
| (13) |
| 5.69 | % |
* | Less than 1% |
(1) | Pursuant to |
(2) | Pursuant to a Schedule |
BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
| Pursuant to Schedule 13G/A dated February |
(4) | Includes 31,216 RSUs vesting within 60 days of the |
(5) |
|
(6) |
|
(7) | Includes |
(8) | Includes |
(9) | Includes |
(10) | Includes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 73 |
|
BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of CSI Compressco LP common units as of March 5, 2018 with respect to (i) our directors; (ii) our Named Executive Officers; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
| Percentage of Class |
| ||
Mark E. Baldwin |
|
| — |
|
| * |
| |
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. |
| 500 |
|
| * |
| ||
Stuart M. Brightman |
| 38,667 |
|
| * |
| ||
Paul D. Coombs |
|
| 32,999 |
|
| * |
| |
John F. Glick |
|
| 2,000 |
|
| * |
| |
Stephen A. Snider |
|
| — |
|
| * |
| |
William D. Sullivan |
|
| 47,768 |
|
| * |
| |
Kenneth E. White, Jr. |
|
| — |
|
| * |
| |
Joseph C. Winkler III |
|
| — |
|
| * |
| |
Elijio V. Serrano |
|
| 6,984 |
|
| * |
| |
Matthew J. Sanderson |
|
| — |
|
| * |
| |
Bass C. Wallace, Jr. |
|
| 16,984 |
|
| * |
| |
Peter J. Pintar |
|
| 30,000 |
|
| * |
| |
Joseph Elkhoury |
|
| 2,000 |
| (1) | * |
| |
Directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) |
|
| 321,549 |
|
|
| 1.0 | % |
|
|
|
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock (Forms 3, 4, and 5) with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, directors, and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all such forms they file.
To our knowledge, and based solely on our review of the copies of such reports, we have received written representations by certain reporting persons that no reports on Form 5 were required and we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors, and 10% stockholders were complied with in a timely manner, with the exception of the initial Form 3 for Owen Serjeant.
We must receive a stockholder proposal
Stockholder proposals intended to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials relating to our 20192023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received at our principal executive offices no later than November 23, 2018.December 12, 2022. To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement,Proxy Statement, such proposal must also comply with the other requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act as well as the procedures set forth in our bylaws,Bylaws, which are separate and distinct from, and in addition to, SEC requirements.
For proposals not intended to be submitted in next year’s proxy statement,Proxy Statement, but sought to be presented at our 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our bylawsBylaws provide that stockholder proposals, including director nominations, must be received at our principal executive offices no later than eighty (80) days prior to the date of our annual meeting, provided, that if the date of the annual meeting was not publicly announced more than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the annual meeting, the notice by the stockholder will be timely if delivered to our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was communicated to the stockholders. Proxies to be solicited by the board for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will confer discretionary authority to vote on any stockholder proposal presented at
|
|
BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
that meeting, unless we receive notice of such proposal not later than February 13, 2018.March 5, 2022. A copy of our bylawsBylaws may be obtained upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas 77380.
Additional Financial Information
Stockholders may obtain additional financial information about us for the year ended December 31, 20172021 from our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. A copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K may be obtained without charge either by sending a request in writing to TETRA Technologies, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, or by calling (281) 367-1983.
The Board of Directors has no knowledge at this time of any matters to be brought before the annual meeting other than those referred to in this document. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote said proxy in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
A certified copy of the list of stockholders as of the record date of March 5, 201828, 2022 will be available for stockholder inspection at our office ten days prior to the meeting date of May 4, 2018.
24, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATIONINFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
This proxy statementProxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc., to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Friday,Tuesday, May 4, 201824, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. local time, and at any adjournment(s) thereof. The purposes of the Annual Meeting are set forth in this proxy statementProxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The complete mailing address of our principal executive offices is 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, and our telephone number is (281) 367-1983.
Attendance at the Annual Meeting is limited to stockholders as of the record date (or their authorized representatives) with evidence of their share ownership and our guests.
We intend to hold our annual meeting in person. However, due to the uncertainties surrounding the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19), it may not be possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting in person and we are planning for the possibility that the annual meeting may be delayed or held by means of remote communication. If we decide to take either such step, we will announce the decision to do so in advance of the annual meeting. If we elect to hold our annual meeting by remote communication, details on how to participate will be issued by press release, filed with the SEC, and posted on our website at http://ir.tetratec.com/events-and-webcasts and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as additional proxy material.
Internet and Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials
As permitted by the rules adopted by the SEC, we are making this proxy statement and related proxy materials available on the internet under the “notice and access” delivery model. The “notice and access” model removes the requirement for public companies to send stockholders a printed set of proxy materials and allows companies instead to deliver to their stockholders a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” and to provide access to the documents over the internet. Our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) was first mailed to stockholders of record and beneficial owners on or about March 22, 2018.April 11, 2022. The Notice is not a form for voting, and presents only an overview of the more complex proxy materials. Stockholders are encouraged to access and review the proxy materials before voting.
This proxy statement, the form of proxy, and voting instructions are being made available to stockholders on or about March 22, 2018April 11, 2022 at www.envisionreports.com/TTI for registered holders and at www.proxyvote.com for beneficial holders. You may also request a printed copy of this proxy statement and the form of proxy by telephone, over the internet or by email by following the instructions printed on your Notice.
Our Annual Report to Stockholders, including financial statements, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172021 is being made available at the same time and by the same methods. The Annual Report to Stockholders is not to be considered as a part of the proxy solicitation material or as having been incorporated by reference.
In addition, any stockholder may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. Receiving future proxy materials by email will save the cost of printing and mailing documents to stockholders and will reduce the impact of annual meetings on the environment. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect unless the stockholder terminates it.
General Voting Instructions
Below are instructions on how to vote as well as information on your rights as a stockholder as they relate to voting. Some of the instructions will differ depending on how your stock is held. It is important to follow the instructions that apply to your situation.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 75 |
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered a stockholder of record and the Notice was sent directly to you by us.
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Your Notice will be your evidence of ownership and serve as your authorization to vote in person; we will provide a ballot for you when you arrive at the meeting. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, check the appropriate box on the proxy card and bring evidence of your share ownership to the meeting. The proxy card and the evidence of your ownership will serve as your authorization to vote in person.
If you do not wish to vote in person or if you will not be attending the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy. You may vote by internet by following the instructions in the Notice or, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, you can vote by internet, by telephone, or by delivering your proxy through the mail.
Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account.
If you are a beneficial owner, in order to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the organization that holds your shares and bring evidence of your stock ownership from the organization with you to the meeting.
If you do not wish to vote in person or if you will not be attending the Annual Meeting, you may direct the vote of your shares by following the instructions on the Notice delivered to you by the organization holding your account. Many brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, or other similar organizations participate in the Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Online and Telephone Program. This program provides eligible stockholders the opportunity to vote via the internet or by telephone. Voting forms will provide instructions for beneficial owners if the organization holding their account participates in the program or other similar programs.
401(k) Plan Participants. If you participate in our 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) and have contributions allocated to the TETRA stock fund, you are entitled to direct the 401(k) Plan trustee to vote the shares of our common stock credited to your account as of the close of business on the record date. You may deliver your voting instructions to the 401(k) Plan trustee by internet or telephone by following the instructions on your proxy card, or by indicating your voting instructions on your proxy card and returning it by mail. All proxy cards that are properly completed, signed, and returned by mail or submitted via the internet or by telephone prior to May 1, 201823, 2022 will be voted. If you return your proxy card with no voting instructions marked, or if you do not return a proxy card or submit voting instructions via the internet or by telephone, your shares will be voted by the trustee as directed by our 401(k) Plan Administrator.
How to Revoke Your Proxy. All valid proxies received prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions so indicated. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. A proxy may be revoked by a stockholder of record at any time before it is exercised by submitting a written revocation or a later-dated proxy to our Corporate Secretary at the mailing address provided above, by voting again via the internet or telephone, or by attending the Annual Meeting in person and so notifying the Inspector of Elections. If you are a beneficial owner and wish to change your vote, you must contact the organization that holds your shares prior to the Annual Meeting to assist you with this process. If you are a 401(k) Plan participant, you may revoke your voting instructions by submitting a new proxy containing your voting instructions via the internet, by telephone, or by delivering a later dated proxy card by mail prior to April 27, 2018.May 23, 2022.
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
Stockholders Entitled to Vote - the Record Date. We fixed the close of business on March 5, 201828, 2022 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment(s) thereof. As of the record date, we had issued and outstanding 126,210,853127,646,966 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock.
Quorum Required. A quorum must be present at the Annual Meeting for us to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. To establish a quorum, we need the presence, either in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote. We will count abstentions and broker
76 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
nonvotes to determine whether a quorum is present. Broker nonvotes occur when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power and the nominee has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.
Number of Votes. You are entitled to one vote per share of our common stock that you own as of the record date on each matter that is called to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Voting on Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors. When voting on this proposal, you have two options:
vote FOR a nominee; or
WITHHOLD authority to vote for a nominee.
If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, the seven persons receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected to serve as directors. Therefore, any shares that are not voted and votes that are withheld will not influence the outcome of the election of directors. Brokers who have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner do not have the discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors. Therefore, broker nonvotes will not be considered in the vote totals and will have no effect on the vote regarding the election of directors. However, as described in greater detail in the “Corporate Governance” section of this proxy, our Board of Directors has adopted a majority vote policy that applies to the election of directors. Under this policy, in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of “withheld” votes from his or her election than votes “for” his or her election is required, unless such nominee has previously submitted an irrevocable resignation in accordance with the policy, to tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, the number of “withheld” votes with respect to a nominee will affect whether or not our majority vote policy will apply to that individual. You may not cumulate your votes for any one of the nominees.
Voting on Proposal Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5.Other Proposals. When voting on Proposal Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5,4 you have three options:
vote FOR a given proposal;
vote AGAINST a given proposal; or
ABSTAIN from voting on a given proposal.
Proposal No. 2 - Ratification of the appointment of independent auditors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares having voting power on such matter that are present or represented at the Annual Meeting. Brokers who have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner have the discretionary authority to vote on this matter. Therefore, broker nonvotes will be included in the vote totals and have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. For the purpose of determining whether the proposal has received a majority vote, abstentions will be included in the vote totals with the result that an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
Proposal No. 3 - Advisory vote to approve the compensation of executive officers is advisory in nature and will not be binding on or overrule any decisions by our Board of Directors or the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee (“HCMCC”) of our Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation CommitteeHCMCC value the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent that there is any significant vote against the compensation of our executive officers, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns, and our Board of Directors will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the advisory vote to approve executive compensation. Consequently, broker nonvotes will not be considered in the vote totals for this proposal and will have no effect on the vote. For the purpose of determining whether the proposal has received a majority vote, abstentions will be included in the vote totals with the result that an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Proposal No. 4 - Approval– The stockholder proposal is precatory and, accordingly, is not binding on the Board of Directors or the 2018 Equity Incentive PlanCompany and requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares having voting power on such matter that are present or represented at the Annual Meeting. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal. Consequently, broker nonvotes will not be considered in the vote totals for this proposal and will have no effect on the vote. For the purpose of determining whether the proposal has received a majority vote, abstentions will be included in the vote totals with the result that an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 77 |
In addition to the vote required by our bylaws described above, under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, the approval of this proposal requires approval of a majority of votes cast on the proposal. The NYSE takes the position that a broker non-vote is not a “vote cast.” Accordingly, broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this matter. However, abstentions will be counted by the NYSE as a vote cast and will be treated as a vote against the proposal.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
Proposal No. 5 - Approval of the 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares having voting power on such matter that are present or represented at the Annual Meeting. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal. Consequently, broker nonvotes will not be considered in the vote totals for this proposal and will have no effect on the vote. For the purpose of determining whether the proposal has received a majority vote, abstentions will be included in the vote totals with the result that an abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
In addition to the vote required by our bylaws described above, under the NYSE rules, the approval of this proposal requires approval of a majority of votes cast on the proposal. The NYSE takes the position that a broker non-vote is not a “vote cast.” Accordingly, broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this matter. However, abstentions will be counted by the NYSE as a vote cast and will be treated as a vote against the proposal.
The proxy confers discretionary authority to the persons named in the proxy authorizing those persons to vote, in their discretion, on any other matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. Our Board of Directors is not currently aware of any such other matters.
Voting of Proxies with Unmarked Votes. All proxies that are properly completed, signed, and returned or submitted via the internet or by telephone prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted. If you return or submit your proxy with no votes marked, your shares will be voted as follows:
FOR the election of each of the nominees for director;
FOR the appointment of Ernst & YoungGrant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm;
FOR the approval of the compensationadvisory vote to approve of executive officers;compensation; and
FORABSTAIN on the approval of our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan; and
FOR the approval of our 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan.stockholder proposal.
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
It is possible for a proxy to indicate that some of the shares represented are not being voted as to certain proposals. This occurs, for example, when a broker is not permitted to vote on a proposal without instructions from the beneficial owner of the stock. In such a case, the nonvoted shares will be considered in the manner described above.
Who Counts the Votes. Votes will be counted by Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
Information About the Solicitation of Proxies.
Our Board of Directors is soliciting the proxy accompanying this statement in connection with the Annual Meeting. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of this proxy statement, our directors, officers, and employees may, without extra compensation, solicit the return of proxies by mail, personal interview, telephone, or email. We have also retained Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $7,500$10,000 plus customary costs and other expenses. Brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries will be requested, in connection with the stock registered in their names, to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of such stock.
We will pay all costs of preparing, printing, assembling, and delivering the Notice of the Annual Meeting, the Notice, this proxy statement, the enclosed form of proxy card and any additional materials, as well as the cost of forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of stock and all other costs of solicitation.
Householding of Annual Meeting Materials
SEC rules regarding the delivery of the notice of internet availability, proxy statements and annual reports permit us, in specified circumstances, to deliver a single set of these reports to any address at which two or more stockholders reside. This method of delivery, often referred to as “householding,” will reduce the amount of duplicative information that security holders receive and lower printing and mailing costs for us. Each stockholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card.
We have delivered only one notice of internet availability of the proxy materials or one paper copy proxy statement and annual report, as applicable, to eligible stockholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from any such stockholder prior to the mailing date. If a stockholder prefers to receive separate copies of our notice of internet availability of proxy materials or our proxy statement or annual report, either now or in the future, we will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the notice of internet availability of proxy materials or our proxy statement or annual report, as requested, to that stockholder at the shared address to which a single copy was delivered. Such requests should be communicated to our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, either by sending a request in writing to 350 Indiana462 South 4th Street, Suite 800, Golden, Colorado 80401,1600, Louisville, KY 40202, or by calling (303) 262-0600.1-866-641-4276.
78 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
If you are currently a stockholder sharing an address with another stockholder and wish to have only one notice of internet availability of proxy materials or proxy statementProxy Statement and annual report delivered to the household in the future, please contact Computershare at the address or telephone number indicated above.
| By order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Kimberly M. O'Brien |
| Corporate Secretary |
|
|
The Woodlands, Texas |
|
|
|
|
| TETRA Technologies, Inc. I |
Appendix A – Information Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures
TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
2018 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
1.Purposes of this Plan. The purposes of this Plan are to: (i) attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, (ii) provide additional incentive to Employees and Consultants, and (iii) promote the success of the Company's business interests. This Plan permits the grant of Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Performance Shares, Other Stock-Based Awards and cash-based awards.
2.Definitions. As used in this Plan, the following definitions shall apply:APPENDIX A – INFORMATION REGARDING
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
(a)“Administrator” means the Board or anyStatement Regarding Use of its Committees that shall be administering this Plan,Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to financial results determined in accordance with Section 4 ofU.S. GAAP, this Plan.
(b)“Applicable Laws” meansproxy may include the requirements relating tofollowing non-GAAP financial measures for the administration of equity-based awards or equity compensation plans under U.S. federalCompany: consolidated and state corporate laws, U.S. federalsegment adjusted EBITDA, adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations, net debt, liquidity, return on capital employed and state securities laws, the Code, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under this Plan.
(c)“Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Performance Shares, Other Stock‑Based Awards and cash-based awards.
(d)“Award Agreement” means the written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to each Award. An Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan.
(e)“Awarded Stock” means the Common Stock subject to an Award.
(f)“Board” means the Board of Directorscash from operations per share. The following schedules provide reconciliations of the Company.non-GAAP financial measures included in this proxy to their most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures. The non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as more fully discussed in the Company’s financial statements and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(g)“Cause” meansAdjusted EBITDA for external reporting purposes is defined as defined in an employment agreementearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, impairments, and certain non-cash charges, non-recurring adjustments and discontinued operations. Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes also excludes adjusted realized and unrealized income or similar agreement betweenloss from investments and certain board and executive compensation, which are considered outside of management’s control. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management as a supplemental financial measure to assess the Participant and the Company. If no such agreement exists, or if such an agreement exists but “cause” is not defined therein, then Cause means a terminationfinancial performance of the Participant's status as a Service Provider because of: (i) any actCompany’s assets, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or omissionhistorical cost basis and to assess the Company’s ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures. Management believes that constitutes a material breachthe exclusion of the special charges from the historical results of operations enables management to evaluate more effectively the Company’s operations over the prior periods and to identify operating trends that could be obscured by the Participantexcluded items.
Adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations is defined as cash from operations less discontinued operations EBITDA and discontinued operations capital expenditures, less capital expenditures net of anysales proceeds and cost of his or her obligations under an Award Agreement or anyequipment sold and including cash distributions to TETRA from CSI Compressco and cash from other material agreement betweeninvestments. Management uses this supplemental financial measure to:
assess the Participant andCompany’s ability to retire debt;
evaluate the Company; (ii) the Participant's conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, (A) any felony or (B) another crime involving dishonesty or moral turpitude or which could reflect negatively upon the Company or any Subsidiary or otherwise impair or impede its or their operations; (iii) the Participant engaging in any act of dishonesty, violence or violation of federal securities laws that is or could be materially injurious to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates; (iv) the Participant's material breach of a written policy of the Company or the rules of any governmental or regulatory body applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; (v) the Participant's refusal to follow the lawful directions of the Participant's immediate supervisor, the Administrator or the Committee; or (vi) any other willful misconduct by the Participant which is materially injurious to the financial condition, operations or business reputation of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affiliates. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, whether Cause exists shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.
(h)“Change in Control” means (y) if the Participant is a party to an employment agreement or similar agreement between the Participant and the Company and any such agreement provides for a definition of “change in control” (or substantially similar term), the definition contained therein, or (z) if no such agreement exists, or if any such agreement exists but “change in control” (or
substantially similar term) is not defined therein, then Change in Control means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i)Any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), but other than (1) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any affiliate, or (2) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Common Stock in the Company) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power represented by the Company's then outstanding voting securities;
(ii)The sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets other than (1) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assetscapacity of the Company to a person or persons (as defined above) who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, at least fifty percent (50%) or more offurther invest and grow; and
to measure the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company at the time of the sale or (2) pursuant to a spin-off type transaction, directly or indirectly, of such assets to the Company's stockholders;
(iii)A change in the composition of the Board during any twelve (12) consecutive month period the result of which fewer than a majority of the Directors are Incumbent Directors. For this purpose, “Incumbent Directors” are Directors who are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election or nomination (but shall not include an individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of Directors to the Company); or
(iv)A merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.
(i)“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder. Any reference to a section of the Code shall be deemed a reference to any successor or amended section of the Code.
(j)“Committee” means a committee of Directors or other individuals that satisfies Applicable Laws and was appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 4 of this Plan.
(k)“Common Stock” means the common stock, $0.01 par value per Share, of the Company.
(l)“Company” means TETRA Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor to thereto.
(m)“Consultant” means any natural person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary to render services to such entity.
(n)“Corporate Transaction” means a transaction described in either clause (ii) or clause (iv) of the definition of a Change in Control.
(o)“Date of Grant” means the effective date on which an Award is granted by the Administrator to a Participant, or such later date as may be specified by the Administrator on the date the Administrator approves the Award, in each case as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement; provided, however, that for purposes of compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act or other
Applicable Law, the Date of Grant will be the date of shareholder approval of the Plan if such date is later than the effective date of the Award, as applicable.
(p)“Director” means a member of the Board.
(q)“Disability” means, if the Participant is a party to an employment agreement or similar agreement between the Participant and the Company and any such agreement provides for a definition of “disability” (or substantially similar term), the definition contained therein. If no such agreement exists, or if any such agreement exists but “disability” (or substantially similar term) is not defined therein, then (y) Disability shall have the meaning given to such term (or substantially similar term) within a disability insurance program that is sponsored by the Company for the benefit of the Participant, or if no such definition exists or the Participant is not covered by such a program, then (z) Disability means Participant: (i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months; (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company; or (iii) is determined by the Social Security Administration to be disabled. Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, the term Disability means a total and permanent disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code for all Awards intended to qualify for Incentive Stock Option treatment. For all purposes of this Section 2(q), the Participant shall not be considered to have incurred a “disability” unless proof of such impairment, sufficient to satisfy the Administrator in its sole discretion, is provided by or on behalf of such Participant to the Administrator.
(r)“Dividend Equivalent” means a credit, made at the sole discretion of the Administrator, to the account of a Participant in an amount equal to the value of dividends paid on one Share for each Share represented by an Award held by such Participant. Under no circumstances shall the payment of a Dividend Equivalent be made contingent on the exercise of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right. Additionally, Dividend Equivalents shall be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Award with respect to which they were paid.
(s)“Employee” means any person, including an officer, employed by the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director's fee by the Company shall be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.
(t)“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(u)“Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:
(i)If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, the Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or system for the day of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;
(ii)If the Common Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock for the day of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable; or
(iii)In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall be determined in good faith by the Administrator.
Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, for federal, state, and local income tax reporting purposes and for such other purposes as the Administrator deems appropriate, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Administrator in accordance with uniform and nondiscriminatory standards adopted by it from time to time.
(v)“Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify and receive favorable tax treatment as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, as designated in the applicable Award Agreement.
(w)“Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option that by its terms does not qualify or is not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.
(x)“Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option to purchase Common Stock granted pursuant to this Plan.
(y)“Other Stock-Based Award” means any other award not specifically described in this Plan that is payable by delivery of Shares or valued, in whole or in part, by reference to, or are otherwise based on, Shares in accordance with Section 12 of this Plan.
(z)“Parent” means either (y) with respect to an Award of Incentive Stock Options, a “parent corporation” with respect to the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code; or (z) with respect to an Award other than an Incentive Stock Option, an entity that is a parent to the Company as determined by the Board.
(aa)“Participant” means a Service Provider who has been granted an Award under this Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Award.
(bb)“Performance Goal” means a goal which has been established by the Committee in connection with an Award and that is based on one or more of the following criteria, as determined by the Committee in its absolute and sole discretion: net income; cash flow; cash flow on investment; cash flow from operations; pre-tax or post-tax profit levels or earnings; operating income or earnings; closings; return on investment; earned value added; expenses; free cash flow; free cash flow per share; earnings; earnings per share; net earnings per share; net earnings from continuing operations; sales growth; sales volume; economic profit; expense reduction; return on assets; return on net assets; return on equity; return on capital; return on sales; return on invested capital; organic revenue; growth in managed assets; total stockholder return; stock price; stock price appreciation; EBITDA; adjusted EBITDA; return in excess of cost of capital; profit in excess of cost of capital; capital expended; working capital; net operating profit after tax; operating margin; profit margin; adjusted revenue; revenue; net revenue; operating revenue; cash provided by operating activities; net cash provided by operating activities per share; cash conversion percentage; new sales; net new sales; cancellations; gross margin; gross margin percentage; revenue before deferral; implementation or completion of critical projects; research; horsepower; horsepower utilization rate; product development; government relations; compliance; mergers; acquisitions or sales of assets or subsidiaries; health; safety; environmental; debt level; cost reduction targets; equity ratios; depreciation and amortization; G&A expense or adjusted G&A measures; charge offs; and such other criteria as established by the Committee in its sole discretion from time to time.
(cc)“Performance Period” means the time period during which the Performance Goals must be met.
(dd)“Performance Share” means Shares issued pursuant to a Performance Share Award under Section 10 of this Plan.
(ee)“Performance Unit” means, pursuant to Section 10 of this Plan, an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver Shares, cash or other securities equal to the value set forth in the Award Agreement.
(ff)“Plan” means this 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. In accordance with Section 16, this Plan became effective on the date it was adopted by the Board, subject to the Company's stockholders approving this Plan within the 12-month period thereafter.
(gg)“Restricted Stock” means Shares issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award under Section 8 of this Plan.
(hh)“Restricted Stock Unit” means an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver Shares, cash, other securities or a combination thereof equal in value to the Fair Market Value of one Share in the Company on the date of vesting or settlement, or as otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, pursuant to Section 11.
(ii)“Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or any successor to Rule 16b‑3, as in effect when discretion is being exercised with respect to this Plan.
(jj)“Service Provider” means an Employee or Consultant.
(kk)“Share” means a share of Common Stock, as may be adjusted in accordance with Section 15 of this Plan.
(ll)“Share Reserve” has the meaning set forth in Section 3(a).
(mm)“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver Shares, cash or other securities equal in value to the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share as of the date such SAR is exercised and the Fair Market Value of a Share as of its Date of Grant, or as otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, pursuant to Section 9.
(nn)“Subsidiary” means either (y) with respect to an Award of Incentive Stock Options, a “subsidiary corporation” with respect to the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code; or (z) with respect to an Award other than an Incentive Stock Option, and for any other purpose herein, an entity that is a subsidiaryperformance of the Company as determined by the Board.
(a)Stock Subject to this Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 15(a) of this Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to all Awards under this Plan is six million three hundred sixty-five thousand (6,365,000) Shares, all of which may be subject to Incentive Stock Option treatment. Awards that may be settled only inAdjusted free cash shallflow from continuing operations do not be counted against the Share reserve, nor shall they reduce the Shares authorized for grant to a Participant in any calendar year. Shares issued under this Plan may come from authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.
(b)Effect of Forfeitures and Other Actions. Any Shares subject to an Award that expires, is cancelled or forfeited or is settled fornecessarily imply residual cash shall, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, again becomeflow available for Awards under this Plan, and the Share Reserve shall be correspondingly replenished. The following Shares shall not, however, again become availablediscretionary expenditures, as they exclude cash requirements for Awardsdebt service or replenish the Share Reserve: (i) Shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of an Option issued under this Plan, (ii) Shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to an Award under this Plan, (iii) Shares repurchased by the Company with proceeds received from the exercise of an Option issued under this Plan, and (iv) Shares subject to a stock settled Stock Appreciation Right issued under this Planother non-discretionary expenditures that are not issueddeducted.
Net debt is defined as the sum of the carrying value of long-term and short-term debt on its consolidated balance sheet, less cash, excluding restricted cash on the balance sheet. Management views net debt as a measure of TETRA’s ability to reduce debt, add to cash balances, pay dividends, repurchase stock, and fund investing and financing activities.
Liquidity is defined as availability under our asset-based credit agreement (“ABL Credit Agreement”), cash and cash equivalents and specific cash payment timing adjustments. Management views liquidity as a measure of TETRA’s ability to fund operating activities and service debt.
Return on capital employed is defined as Adjusted EBIT divided by average net capital employed, where Adjusted EBIT is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, and certain non-cash charges, non-recurring adjustments and discontinued operations; net capital employed is defined as assets, excluding assets associated with discontinued operations, plus impaired assets, receivables from CSI Compressco, less investment in connectionCSI Compressco, less cash and current liabilities, excluding current liabilities associated with discontinued operations; and average net capital employed is calculated as the settlementaverage of that Award upon its exercise. net capital employed for the respective periods. Return on capital employed is used by management as a supplemental financial measure to assess the financial performance of the Company relative to assets, without regard to financing methods or capital structure.
Cash from operations per share is defined as Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes, less interest expense and cash taxes, plus cash distributions to TETRA from CSI Compressco and cash from other investments; divided by weighted average common shares outstanding.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 80 |
APPENDIX A – INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Adjusted EBITDA
The following reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a supplement to financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Completion Fluids & Products |
|
| Water & Flowback Services |
|
| Corporate SG&A |
|
| Other and Eliminations |
|
| Total |
| |||||
| (In Thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations | $ | 54,981 |
|
| $ | (11,116 | ) |
| $ | (39,990 | ) |
| $ | (18,596 | ) |
| $ | (14,721 | ) |
Adjustment to long-term incentives |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 4,675 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 4,675 |
|
Transaction and other expenses |
| 322 |
|
|
| 878 |
|
|
| 2,419 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 3,619 |
|
Restructuring |
| 1,209 |
|
|
| 840 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 2,049 |
|
Stock warrant fair value adjustment |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| (198 | ) |
|
| (198 | ) |
Former CEO stock appreciation right expense |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 865 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 865 |
|
Impairments and other charges |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 132 |
|
|
| 132 |
|
Allowance for bad debt |
| - |
|
|
| (230 | ) |
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| (230 | ) |
Adjusted income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations | $ | 56,512 |
|
| $ | (9,628 | ) |
| $ | (32,031 | ) |
| $ | (18,662 | ) |
| $ | (3,809 | ) |
Adjusted interest expense, net |
| (595 | ) |
|
| (512 | ) |
|
| - |
|
|
| 17,483 |
|
|
| 16,376 |
|
Adjusted depreciation and amortization |
| 6,885 |
|
|
| 25,045 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 889 |
|
|
| 32,819 |
|
Equity compensation expense |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 4,664 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 4,664 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA for external reporting purposes | $ | 62,802 |
|
| $ | 14,905 |
|
| $ | (27,367 | ) |
| $ | (290 | ) |
| $ | 50,050 |
|
Adjusted realized and unrealized (income) loss from investments |
| (12,772 | ) |
|
| - |
|
|
| 419 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| (12,353 | ) |
Board and executive compensation adjustments |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 309 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 309 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes | $ | 50,030 |
|
| $ | 14,905 |
|
| $ | (26,639 | ) |
| $ | (290 | ) |
| $ | 38,006 |
|
(c)Reserved Shares. The Company, during the term of this Plan, shall at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this Plan.
2022 Proxy Statement | TETRA Technologies, Inc. I 81 |
APPENDIX A – INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
(d)No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares will be issued under
| Three Months Ended December 31, 2020 |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Completion Fluids & Products |
|
| Water & Flowback Services |
|
| Corporate SG&A |
|
| Other and Eliminations |
|
| Total |
| |||||
| (In Thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations | $ | 10,979 |
|
| $ | (3,442 | ) |
| $ | (7,550 | ) |
| $ | (7,203 | ) |
| $ | (7,216 | ) |
Severance |
| 143 |
|
|
| 184 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 332 |
|
Transaction and other expenses |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 826 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 826 |
|
Restructuring abd severance expenses |
| 397 |
|
|
| 587 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 984 |
|
Stock warrant fair value adjustment |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 76 |
|
|
| 76 |
|
Impairments and other charges |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
Allowance for bad debt |
| 1,119 |
|
|
| 104 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 1,223 |
|
Adjusted income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations | $ | 12,638 |
|
| $ | (2,567 | ) |
| $ | (6,719 | ) |
| $ | (7,127 | ) |
| $ | (3,775 | ) |
Adjusted interest (income) expense, net |
| (265 | ) |
|
| (1,506 | ) |
|
| - |
|
|
| 5,817 |
|
|
| 4,046 |
|
Adjusted depreciation and amortization |
| 1,810 |
|
|
| 7,757 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 172 |
|
|
| 9,739 |
|
Equity compensation expense |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 991 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 991 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA for external reporting purposes | $ | 14,183 |
|
| $ | 3,684 |
|
| $ | (5,728 | ) |
| $ | (1,138 | ) |
| $ | 11,001 |
|
Board and executive compensation adjustments |
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 140 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 140 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA for compensation purposes
| $ | 14,183 |
|
| $ | 3,684 |
|
| $ | (5,588 | ) |
| $ | (1,138 | ) |
| $ | 11,141 |
|
Net Debt
The following reconciliation of net debt is presented as a supplement to financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
|
| December 31, 2021 |
|
| December 31, 2020 |
| ||
|
| (In Thousands) |
| |||||
Non-restricted cash |
| $ | 31,551 |
|
| $ | 67,252 |
|
Asset-based credit agreement |
|
| 67 |
|
|
| - |
|
Term credit agreement |
|
| 151,869 |
|
|
| 199,894 |
|
Net debt |
| $ | 120,385 |
|
| $ | 132,642 |
|
Adjusted Free Cash Flow From Continuing Operations
The following reconciliation of adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations is presented as a supplement to financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| |
|
| (In Thousands) |
| |
Cash from operating activities |
| $ | 4,657 |
|
Discontinued operations operating activities (adjusted EBITDA) |
|
| (416 | ) |
Cash from continued operating activities |
|
| 5,073 |
|
Less: continuing operations capital expenditures, net of proceeds from asset sales |
|
| (15,866 | ) |
Distributions from CSI Compressco LP(1) |
|
| 156 |
|
Cash received from sale of investments |
|
| 17,627 |
|
Cash (distributed to partners) received from other investments |
|
| 2,354 |
|
Adjusted free cash flow from continuing operations |
| $ | 9,344 |
|
82 I TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 2022 Proxy Statement |
APPENDIX A – INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
(1) Following the Plan, butGP Sale on January 29, 2021, TETRA retained an interest in CSI Compressco representing approximately 3.8% of the Administrator may,outstanding common units as of December 31, 2021.
Liquidity
The following reconciliation of liquidity is presented as a supplement to financial results prepared in its discretion, adopt any rounding convention it deems suitable or pay cashaccordance with GAAP.
|
| December 31, 2021 |
|
| December 31, 2020 |
| ||
|
| (In Thousands) |
| |||||
Availability under ABL credit agreement |
| $ | 36,103 |
|
| $ | 24,558 |
|
Cash and restricted cash |
|
| 31,551 |
|
|
| 67,317 |
|
Payroll timing adjustment |
|
| - |
|
|
| 1,825 |
|
Liquidity |
| $ | 67,654 |
|
| $ | 93,700 |
|
Return on Capital Employed
The following reconciliation of return on capital employed is presented as a supplement to financial results prepared in lieuaccordance with GAAP.
|
|
|
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| (In Thousands) |
| |
Net income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations |
|
|
|
| $ | (128,109 | ) |
Severance |
|
|
|
|
| 1,511 |
|
Transaction and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
| (320 | ) |
Restructuring and severance expenses |
|
|
|
|
| 836 |
|
Stock warrant fair value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
| (1,624 | ) |
Impairments and other charges |
|
|
|
|
| 116,390 |
|
Former CEO stock appreciation right expense |
|
|
|
|
| 504 |
|
Allowance for bed debt |
|
|
|
|
| 76 |
|
Adjusted income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations |
|
|
|
| $ | (10,736 | ) |
Adjusted interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
| 21,256 |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
|
|
|
| $ | 10,520 |
|
| December 31, 2018 |
|
| December 31, 2019 |
| ||
| (In Thousands, Except Percentages) |
| |||||
Assets(1) | $ | 490,354 |
|
| $ | 505,319 |
|
Cash |
| 24,180 |
|
|
| 15,334 |
|
Current liabilities(2) |
| 109,154 |
|
|
| 86,261 |
|
Net capital employed | $ | 357,020 |
|
| $ | 403,724 |
|
Average net capital employed |
|
|
|
| $ | 380,372 |
|
Adjusted EBIT as % of average net capital employed |
|
|
|
|
| 2.8 | % |
1) Assets as of any fractional ShareDecember 31, 2019 consist of $1,271.9 million consolidated assets, plus $117.2 million impaired assets, less $822.7 million of current and long-term assets associated with discontinued operations and $61.2 million of adjustments related to the investment in settlementCSI Compressco. Assets as of an Award.December 31, 2018 consist of $1,385.5 million consolidated assets, less $826.7 million of current and long-term assets associated with discontinued operations and $68.4 million of adjustments related to the investment in CSI Compressco.
(2) Current liabilities as of December 31, 2019 consist of $188.7 million of consolidated current liabilities less $102.5 million of current liabilities associated with discontinued operations. Current liabilities as of December 31, 2018 consist of $200.4 million of consolidated current liabilities less $90.8 million of current liabilities associated with discontinued operations
(i)Multiple Administrative Bodies. Different Committees with respect to different groups of Service Providers may administer this Plan.
(ii)Rule 16b-3. If a transaction is intended to be exempt under Rule 16b-3, then it shall be structured to satisfy the requirements for exemption under Rule 16b-3.
(iii)Other Administration. Other than as provided above, this Plan shall be administered by (A) the Board or (B) a Committee constituted to satisfy Applicable Laws.
(b)Powers of the Administrator. Subject to (i) the provisions of this Plan and compliance with Applicable Laws, and (ii) in the case of a Committee, the specific duties delegated by the Board to the Committee, the Administrator shall have the authority, in its discretion to take the following actions under the Plan:
(i)determine the Fair Market Value of Awards;
(ii)select the Service Providers to whom Awards may be granted under this Plan;
(iii)determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted under this Plan;
(iv)determine when Awards are to be granted under this Plan and the applicable Date of Grant;
(v)approve forms of Award Agreements for use under this Plan;
(vi)determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, of any Award granted under this Plan including, but not limited to, the exercise price, the time or times when Awards may be exercised (which may be based on Performance Goals), any acceleration of vesting or waiver of forfeiture or repurchase restrictions (subject to the provisions of Section 6(c)), and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the Shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine;
(vii)construe and interpret the terms of this Plan and Award Agreements;
(viii)prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan, including rules and regulations relating to the creation and administration of sub-plans;
(ix)amend the terms of any outstanding Award, including the discretionary authority to extend the post‑termination exercise period of Awards and accelerate the satisfaction of any vesting criteria or waiver of forfeiture or repurchase restrictions, provided that any amendment that would adversely affect the Participant's rights under an outstanding Award shall not be made without the Participant's written consent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an amendment shall not be treated as
adversely affecting the rights of the Participant if the amendment causes an Incentive Stock Option to become a Nonqualified Stock Option or if the amendment is made to the minimum extent necessary to avoid the adverse tax consequences to the Participant of Section 409A of the Code;
(x)allow Participants to satisfy withholding tax obligations by electing to have the Company withhold from the Shares or cash to be issued upon exercise or vesting of an Award up to the number of Shares or cash having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld based on any amount up to the minimum supplemental income tax rate in the applicable jurisdiction. The Fair Market Value of any Shares to be withheld shall be determined on the date that the amount of the tax to be withheld is to be determined, and all elections by a Participant to have Shares or cash withheld for this purpose shall be made in such form and under such conditions as the Administrator may deem necessary or advisable;
(xi)authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Administrator;
(xii)allow a Participant to defer the receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to the Participant under an Award to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code;
(xiii)determine whether Awards shall be settled in Shares, cash or in a combination of Shares and cash;
(xiv)determine whether Awards shall be adjusted for dividends or Dividend Equivalents, provided, however, that to the extent an Award is to be settled in Shares, any dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall not be issued or granted with respect to unvested Awards, and instead shall be held by the Company and delivered to the Participant, if at all, only upon such Award becoming vested;
(xv)create Other Stock-Based Awards for issuance under this Plan;
(xvi)impose such restrictions, conditions or limitations as it determines appropriate with respect to the timing and manner of any resales by a Participant or other subsequent transfers by a Participant of any Shares issued as a result of or under an Award, including without limitation, (A) restrictions under an insider trading policy, and (B) restrictions as to the use of a specified brokerage firm for such resales or other transfers;
(xvii)to the extent consistent with Section 409A of the Code, establish one or more programs under this Plan to permit selected Participants the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of consideration upon exercise of an Award, satisfaction of Performance Goals, or other event that, absent the election, would entitle the Participant to payment or receipt of Shares or other consideration under an Award;
(xviii)to interpret, administer, reconcile any inconsistency in, correct any defect in, and/or supply any omission under, this Plan or any Award Agreement or other and any instrument or agreement relating to an Award; and
(xix)taking such actions as are provided in Section 4(d) with respect to Awards to foreign Service Providers; and
(xx)make all other determinations that the Administrator deems necessary or advisable for administering this Plan.
The express grant in this Plan of any specific power to the Administrator shall not be construed as limiting any power or authority of the Administrator. However, the Administrator may not exercise any right or power reserved to the Board under the express terms of this Plan or by Applicable Laws.
(c)Prohibition on Repricing of Options and SARs. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, no repricing of Options or SARs may be effectuated without the prior approval of the Company's stockholders; provided, however, that the foregoing prohibition shall not apply to the extent an adjustment is required under Section 15.
(d)Awards to Foreign Service Providers. The Administrator may grant Awards to Service Providers who are foreign nationals, who are located outside of the United States or who are not compensated from a payroll maintained in the United States, or who are otherwise subject to (or could cause the Company to be subject to) legal or regulatory requirements of countries outside of the United States, on such terms and conditions different from those specified in this Plan as may, in the judgment of the Administrator, be necessary or desirable to comply with applicable foreign laws and regulatory requirements and to promote achievement of the purposes of this Plan. In connection therewith, the Administrator may establish such subplans and modify exercise procedures and other Plan rules and procedures to the extent such actions are deemed necessary or desirable, and may take any other action that it deems advisable to obtain local regulatory approvals or to comply with any necessary local governmental regulatory exemptions.
(e)Effect of Administrator's Decision. The Administrator's decisions, determinations, actions and interpretations shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons having an interest under this Plan.
(f)Indemnification. The Company shall defend and indemnify all past and present members of the Board, the Committee, the Administrator, officers and Employees of the Company or of a Parent or Subsidiary to whom authority to act for the Board, the Committee, the Administrator or the Company has been delegated under this Plan (“Indemnitees”), to the maximum extent permitted by law, against (i) all reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the defense of any claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein (collectively, a “Claim”), to which any of them is a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act in connection with this Plan, or in connection with any Award granted under this Plan; and (ii) all amounts required to be paid by them in settlement of a Claim (provided the settlement is approved by the Company) or required to be paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any Claim. However, no such person shall be entitled to indemnification to the extent it is determined in such Claim that such person did not in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the Company (or in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reason to believe that the conduct complained of was unlawful). In addition, to be entitled to indemnification, the Indemnitee must, within thirty (30) days after written notice of the Claim, offer the Company, in writing, the opportunity, at the Company's expense, to defend the Claim. The right to indemnification shall be in addition to all other rights of indemnification available to the Indemnitee.
5.Eligibility. With the exception of Incentive Stock Options, Awards may be granted to Employees and Consultants. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees.
(a)$100,000 Limitation for Incentive Stock Options. Each Option shall be designated in the Award Agreement as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. However, notwithstanding such designation, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and any Parent or Subsidiary) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options. For purposes of this Section 6(a), Incentive Stock Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted. The Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be determined as of the time the Options with respect to such Shares are granted.
(b)Special Annual Limits. Subject to Section 15(a) of this Plan, the maximum number of Shares that may be subject to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted to any Service
Provider in any calendar year shall equal one million (1,000,000) Shares. Subject to Section 15(a) of this Plan, the maximum number of Shares that may be subject to Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units and Other Stock-Based Awards granted to any Service Provider in any calendar year shall equal one million (1,000,000) Shares.
(c)Minimum Vesting Requirement. Except as permitted under the Carve-Out Exception (defined below), all Awards that are designated to be settled in Shares shall be subject to a minimum vesting requirement of at least one year from the date the Award was granted, and no portion of any such Award may vest or become exercisable earlier than the first anniversary of the date such Award was granted; provided, however, that the foregoing minimum vesting requirement shall not apply: (i) with respect to 5% of the Share reserve as initially set forth in Section 3(a) (such 5% being the “Carve-Out Exception”), and (ii) to the vesting of an Award that is accelerated as a result of a Change in Control under terms consistent with this Plan. For purposes of clarity and avoidance of doubt, the vesting of Awards that have not been held by a Participant for at least one year from the Date of Grant may be accelerated (in whole or in part) in accordance with the terms of this Plan, however, any such acceleration, other than in connection with a Change in Control, within such one-year period with respect to Awards designated to be settled in Shares shall be included in, and reduce the number of Shares available under, the Carve-Out Exception. To the extent Section 3(a) is amended to increase the number of Shares reserved therein, then 5% of the Shares subject to such increase shall be added to, and increase, the number of Shares subject to the Carve-Out Exception.
(a)Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Administrator, at any time and from time to time, may grant Options to Service Providers in such amounts as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(b)Option Agreement. Each Award of an Option shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Date of Grant, exercise price, the term of the Option, the number of Shares subject to the Option, the exercise restrictions (if any) applicable to the Option, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(c)Term of Option. The term of each Option shall be stated in the Award Agreement. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the term shall be 10 years from the Date of Grant or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement. Moreover, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Participant who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the term of the Incentive Stock Option shall be five years from the Date of Grant or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement.
(d)Option Exercise Price and Consideration.
(i)Exercise Price. The per Share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option shall be determined by the Administrator, subject to the following:
(1)In the case of an Incentive Stock Option:
(A)granted to an Employee who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the per Share exercise price shall be no less than 110% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant; and
(B)granted to any Employee other than an Employee described in paragraph (A) immediately above, the per Share exercise price shall be not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.
(2)In the case of a Nonqualified Stock Option, the per Share exercise price shall be determined by the Administrator, but shall not be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant unless the terms of such Nonqualified Stock Option would otherwise comply with the exemption from taxation under Section 409A of the Code.
(3)Notwithstanding the foregoing, Options may be granted with a per Share exercise price of less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant pursuant to a transaction described in, and in a manner consistent with, Section 424(a) of the Code.
(ii)Waiting Period and Exercise Dates. At the time an Option is granted, the Administrator shall fix the period within which the Option may be exercised and shall determine any conditions that must be satisfied before the Option may be exercised. Subject to the provisions of Section 6(c), the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the satisfaction of such conditions at any time.
(e)Form of Consideration. The Administrator shall determine the acceptable form of consideration for exercising an Option, including the method of payment. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the Administrator shall determine the acceptable form of consideration at the time of grant. Such consideration, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, may consist entirely of:
(iii)in the discretion of the Administrator, other Shares which meet the conditions established by the Administrator to avoid adverse accounting consequences;
(iv)in the discretion of the Administrator, consideration received by the Company under a cashless exercise or net exercise program implemented by the Company in connection with this Plan;
(v)in the discretion of the Administrator, a reduction in the amount of any Company liability to the Participant, including any liability attributable to the Participant's participation in any Company-sponsored deferred compensation program or arrangement;
(vi)in the discretion of the Administrator, any combination of the foregoing methods of payment; or
(vii)in the discretion of the Administrator, any other consideration and method of payment for the issuance of Shares permitted by Applicable Laws.
(i)Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Stockholder. Any Option granted under this Plan shall be exercisable according to the terms of this Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Administrator and set forth in the Award Agreement. An Option shall be deemed exercised when the Company receives: (x) written or electronic notice of exercise (in accordance with the Award Agreement) from the person entitled to exercise the Option, and (y) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised (including provision for any applicable tax withholding). Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Administrator and permitted by the Award Agreement and this Plan. Shares issued upon exercise of an Option shall be issued in the name of the Participant or, if requested by the Participant, in the name of the Participant and his or her spouse. Until the Shares are issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder shall exist with respect to the Awarded Stock, notwithstanding the exercise of the Option. The Company shall issue (or cause to be issued) such
Shares promptly after the Option is exercised. No adjustment shall be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the Shares are issued, except as provided in Section 15 of this Plan or the applicable Award Agreement. Exercising an Option in any manner shall decrease the number of Shares thereafter available for purchase under the Option by the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised.
(ii)Termination of Relationship as a Service Provider (Other Than Death or Disability). If a Participant ceases to be a Service Provider, other than upon the Participant's death or Disability, the Participant may exercise the vested portion of his or her Option within the time period specified in the Award Agreement (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). If the Award Agreement does not specify a time period within which the vested portion of such Option must be exercised following a Participant ceasing to be a Service Provider, the vested portion of such Option shall be exercisable for three (3) months following his or her ceasing to be a Service Provider (other than upon the Participant's death or Disability). Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Option on the date he or she ceases to be a Service Provider (other than upon the Participant's death or Disability), then immediately thereafter, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3. Additionally, if the Participant does not exercise his or her Option as to all of the vested Shares within the specified time period, then immediately thereafter, the Option shall terminate and the Shares covered by the unexercised portion of the Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(iii)Disability of Participant. If a Participant ceases to be a Service Provider as a result of his or her Disability, the Participant may exercise the vested portion of his or her Option within the time period specified in the Award Agreement (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). If the Award Agreement does not specify a time period within which the vested portion of such Option must be exercised following a Participant ceasing to be a Service Provider as a result of his or her Disability, the vested portion of such Option shall be exercisable for twelve (12) months following the Participant ceasing to be a Service Provider as a result of his or her Disability. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Option on the date he or she ceases to be a Service Provider as a result of his or her Disability, then immediately thereafter, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3. Additionally, if the Participant does not exercise his or her Option as to all of the vested Shares within the specified time period, then immediately thereafter, the Option shall terminate and the Shares covered by the unexercised portion of the Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(iv)Death of Participant. If a Participant dies while a Service Provider, the vested portion of the Option may be exercised within the time period specified in the Award Agreement (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Award Agreement), by the beneficiary designated by the Participant prior to his or her death in accordance with Section 26. If the Award Agreement does not specify a time period within which the vested portion of such Option must be exercised following a Participant's death, the vested portion of such Option shall be exercisable for twelve (12) months following his or her date of death. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Option on the date he or she ceases to be a Service Provider as a result of his or her death, then immediately thereafter, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3. Additionally, if the Participant's beneficiary designated pursuant to Section 26 does not exercise the Option as to all of the vested Shares within the specified time period, then immediately thereafter, the Option shall terminate and the Shares covered by the unexercised portion of the Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(a)Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Administrator, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Service Providers in such amounts as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(b)Restricted Stock Agreement. Each Award of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the number of Shares granted, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(c)Removal of Restrictions. Subject to the provisions of Section 6(c), the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the time at which any restrictions shall lapse or be removed.
(d)Voting Rights. Service Providers holding Shares of Restricted Stock may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise as set forth in the Award Agreement.
(e)Dividends and Other Distributions. Shares of Restricted Stock shall be entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to such Shares. All such dividends and distributions shall be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid and no such dividends or other distributions shall be issued or granted with respect to shares of Restricted Stock, and instead shall be held by the Company and delivered to the Participant, if at all, only upon such Awards becoming vested.
(f)Return of Restricted Stock to Company. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, the Restricted Stock for which restrictions have not lapsed shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(a)Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, a SAR may be granted to a Service Provider at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion. The Administrator shall have complete discretion to determine the number of SARs granted to any Service Provider. Subject to the provisions of Section 6(c), the Administrator shall have complete discretion to determine the terms and conditions of SARs granted under this Plan, including the sole discretion to accelerate exercisability at any time; provided, however, that the per Share exercise price that will determine the amount of the payment the Company receives upon exercise of a SAR shall not be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.
(b)SAR Agreement. Each SAR grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Date of Grant, exercise price, the term, the conditions of exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(c)Expiration of SARs. A SAR granted under this Plan shall expire upon the date determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, as set forth in the Award Agreement; provided, however, no SAR shall be exercisable later than 10 years after the Date of Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rules of Sections 7(f)(ii), 7(f)(iii) and 7(f)(iv) shall also apply to SARs.
(d)Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise of a SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
(i)The difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the exercise price; times
(ii)The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.
At the sole discretion of the Administrator, the payment upon the exercise of a SAR may be in cash, in Shares of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof.
10.Performance Units and Performance Shares.
(a)Grant of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, Performance Units and Performance Shares may be granted to Service Providers at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion. The Administrator shall have complete discretion in determining the number of Performance Units and Performance Shares granted to each Service Provider.
(b)Value of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Each Performance Unit and Performance Share shall have an initial value established by the Administrator on or before the Date of Grant. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Date of Grant.
(c)Performance Goals and Other Terms. The Administrator shall set Performance Goals in its sole discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, shall determine the number or value of Performance Units and Performance Shares that shall be paid out to the Participant. Each Award of Performance Units or Performance Shares shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Date of Grant, Performance Period and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator in its sole discretion shall determine. The Administrator may set Performance Goals based upon the achievement of Company‑wide, divisional, or individual goals (including solely continued service) or any other basis determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion.
(d)Earning of Performance Units and Performance Shares. After the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units or Performance Shares shall be entitled to receive a payout of the number of Performance Units or Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding Performance Goals have been achieved. After the grant of Performance Units or Performance Shares, and subject to the provisions of Section 6(c), the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, reduce or waive any performance objectives for the Performance Unit or Performance Share.
(e)Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units and Performance Shares. Payment of earned Performance Units and earned Performance Shares, if any, shall be made after the expiration of the applicable Performance Period at the time determined by the Administrator. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units and Performance Shares in the form of cash, in Shares (which have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the value of the earned Performance Units or Performance Shares, as applicable, at the close of the applicable Performance Period) or in a combination of cash and Shares.
(f)Cancellation of Performance Units or Performance Shares. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, all unearned or unvested Performance Units and Performance Shares shall be forfeited to the Company, and the Shares subject to such Awards (if any) shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
11.Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units shall consist of Shares of Restricted Stock, Performance Shares or Performance Unit Awards that the Administrator, in its sole discretion, permits to be paid out in a lump sum, installments or on a deferred basis, in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Administrator
12.Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards. Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, other Awards granted under this Plan and/or cash awards made outside of this Plan. The Administrator shall have authority to determine the Service Providers, to whom and the time or times at which, Other Stock-Based Awards shall be made, the amount of such Other Stock-Based Awards, and all other terms and conditions of the Other Stock-Based Awards, including any dividend or voting rights and whether the Award should be paid in cash. Cash-based awards may be granted in such amounts and subject to such other terms as the Administrator, in its discretion, determines to be appropriate.
13.Leaves of Absence. Unless the Administrator provides otherwise, vesting of Awards granted under this Plan shall be suspended during any unpaid leave of absence and shall resume on the date the Participant returns to work on a regular schedule as determined by the Company; provided, however, that no vesting credit shall be awarded for the time vesting has been suspended during such leave of absence. A Service Provider shall not cease to be an Employee in the case of (i) any leave of absence approved by the Company or (ii) transfers between locations of the Company or between the Company, its Parent, or any Subsidiary. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, no leave of absence may exceed 90 days, unless reemployment upon expiration of such leave is guaranteed by statute or contract. If reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company is not guaranteed by statute or contract, then at the end of three months following the expiration of the leave of absence, any Incentive Stock Option held by the Participant shall cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and shall be treated for tax purposes as a Nonqualified Stock Option.
14.Non-Transferability of Awards. Unless determined otherwise by the Administrator, an Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner, other than as provided in Section 26 or by will or by the laws of descent or distribution following the Participant’s death. An outstanding Award may be exercised during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant. If the Administrator makes an Award transferable, such Award Agreement shall contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate.
15.Adjustments; Dissolution or Liquidation; Change in Control.
(a)Adjustments for Changes in Capitalization. In the event of any equity restructuring (within the meaning of FASB ASC Topic 718) that causes the per share value of Shares to change, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through an extraordinary dividend, the Administrator shall make such adjustments as it deems equitable and appropriate to (i) the aggregate number and kind of Shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance under this Plan, (ii) the number and kind of Shares or other securities subject to outstanding Awards, (iii) the exercise price of outstanding Options and SARs, and (iv) any maximum limitations prescribed by this Plan with respect to certain types of Awards or the grants to individuals of certain types of Awards. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, including a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such equitable adjustments described in the foregoing sentence may be made as determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights of Participants. In either case, any such adjustment shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes of this Plan. No adjustment shall be made pursuant to this Section 15(a) in connection with the conversion of any convertible securities of the Company, or in a manner that would cause Incentive Stock Options to violate Section 422(b) of the Code or cause an Award to be subject to adverse tax consequences under Section 409A of the Code.
(i)Continuation, Assumption or Replacement of Awards. Unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement or another written agreement between a Participant and the Company, in the event of a Change in Control that involves a Corporate Transaction, then the surviving or successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary entity of the successor corporation (collectively, the “Successor Corporation”) may continue, assume or substitute Awards outstanding as of the date of the Corporate Transaction (with such adjustments as may be required or permitted by Section 15(a)), and such Awards or substitutions therefor shall remain outstanding and be governed by their respective terms subject to Section 15(b)(iv) below. A Successor Corporation may elect to continue, assume or substitute only some Awards or portions of Awards. For purposes of the foregoing, an Award shall be considered assumed or substituted if in connection with the Corporate Transaction and in a manner consistent with Code Section 409A (and Code Section 424 if the Award is an Incentive Stock Option) either (1) the contractual obligations represented by the Award are expressly assumed by the Successor Corporation with appropriate adjustments to the number and type of securities subject to the Award and the exercise price thereof that preserves the intrinsic value of the Award existing at the time of the Corporate
Transaction, or (2) the Participant has received a comparable equity-based award that preserves the intrinsic value of the Award existing at the time of the Corporate Transaction and contains terms and conditions that are substantially similar to those of the Award.
(ii)Acceleration. Unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control that involves a Corporate Transaction, if and to the extent that outstanding Awards under the Plan are not continued, assumed or replaced in connection with a Corporate Transaction, then:
(1)such outstanding Awards of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable for such period of time prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction as is deemed fair and equitable by the Administrator, and shall terminate at the effective time of the Corporate Transaction;
(2)such outstanding Awards other than Awards of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall fully vest immediately prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction; and
(3)to the extent vesting of any Award is subject to satisfaction of specified performance goals, such Award shall be deemed “fully vested” for purposes of this Section 15(b)(ii)(3) if the performance goals are deemed to have been satisfied at the target level of performance and the vested portion of the Award at that level of performance is proportionate to the portion of the performance period that has elapsed as of the effective time of the Corporate Transaction.
The Administrator shall provide written notice of the period of accelerated exercisability of Option and SAR Awards to all affected Participants. The exercise of any Option or SAR Award whose exercisability is accelerated as provided in this Section 15(b)(ii) shall be conditioned upon the consummation of the Corporate Transaction and shall be effective only immediately before such consummation.
(iii)Payment for Awards. If and to the extent that outstanding Awards under the Plan are not continued, assumed or replaced in connection with a Corporate Transaction, then the Administrator may provide that some or all of such outstanding Awards shall be canceled at or immediately prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction in exchange for cash payments to the holders as provided in this Section 15(b)(iii). The Administrator will not be required to treat all Awards similarly for purposes of this Section 15(b)(iii). The payment for any Award canceled shall be in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (1) the fair market value (as determined in good faith by the Administrator) of the consideration that would otherwise be received in the Corporate Transaction for the number of Shares subject to the Award, and (2) the aggregate exercise price (if any) for the Shares subject to such Award. If the amount determined pursuant to the preceding sentence is not a positive number with respect to any Award, such Award may be canceled pursuant to this Section 15(b)(iii) without payment of any kind to the affected Participant. With respect to an Award whose vesting is subject to the satisfaction of specified performance goals, the number of Shares subject to such an Award for purposes of this Section 15(b)(iii) shall be the number of Shares as to which the Award would have been deemed “fully vested” for purposes of Section 15(b)(iii). Payment of any amount under this Section 15(b)(iii) shall be made in such form, on such terms and subject to such conditions as the Administrator determines in its discretion, which may or may not be the same as the form, terms and conditions applicable to payments to the Company’s stockholders in connection with the Corporate Transaction, and may, in the Administrator’s discretion, include subjecting such payments to vesting conditions comparable to those of the Award canceled, subjecting such payments to escrow or holdback terms comparable to those imposed upon the Company’s stockholders under the Corporate Transaction, or calculating and paying the present value of payments that would otherwise be subject to escrow or holdback terms.
(iv)Termination After a Corporate Transaction. If and to the extent the Awards are continued, assumed or replaced under the circumstances described in Section 15(b)(i), and if within twenty-four months after the Corporate Transaction the Participant’s status as a Service Provider is
terminated by the Company or Successor Corporation without Cause or by the Participant for Good Reason, then:
(1)all outstanding Awards of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights issued to such Participant that are not yet fully exercisable shall immediately become exercisable in full and shall remain exercisable for one year following the date the Participant ceases to be a Service Provider;
(2)all outstanding Awards other than Awards of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall fully vest immediately upon the date the Participant ceases to be a Service Provider; and
(3)to the extent vesting of any Award is subject to satisfaction of specified performance goals, such Award shall vest as provided in Section 15(b)(ii)(3), except that the proportionate vesting amount will be determined with respect to the portion of the performance period during which the Participant was a Service Provider.
For purposes of the foregoing, the term “Good Reason” means a voluntary termination by a Participant who is an Employee of his or her employment with the Company or the Successor Corporation because of: (1) a material diminution in the Participant's base salary or bonus opportunity from those applicable to him or her as of the date immediately prior to such Change in Control; (1) a material diminution in the nature or scope of the Participant's authority, duties or responsibilities from those applicable to him or her as of the date immediately prior to such Change in Control; (3) the Company or the Successor Corporation requiring the Participant to be based at any office or location more than fifty (50) miles from where the Participant was based as of the date immediately prior to such Change in Control; or (4) a material breach by the Company or the Successor Corporation of any term or provision of this Plan, an Award Agreement, employment agreement or other contractual agreement (if any) between the Participant and the Company or the Successor Corporation.
(c)Other Change in Control. Unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement or another written agreement between a Participant and the Company, in the event of a Change in Control that does not involve a Corporate Transaction, the Administrator may, in its discretion, take such action as it deems appropriate with respect to outstanding Awards, which may include: (i) providing for the cancellation of any Award in exchange for payments in a manner similar to that provided in Section 15(b)(iii) or (ii) making such adjustments to the Awards then outstanding as the Administrator deems appropriate to reflect such Change in Control, which may include the acceleration of vesting in full or in part. The Administrator will not be required to treat all Awards similarly in such circumstances, and may include such further provisions and limitations in any Award Agreement as it may deem equitable and in the best interests of the Company.
(d)Dissolution or Liquidation. Unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Administrator will notify each Participant as soon as practicable prior to the effective date of such proposed transaction. An Award will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action.
16.Board and Stockholder Approval; Term of Plan. The Board approved this Plan to be effective on March 15, 2018, subject to the Company's stockholders approving this Plan within the 12-month period thereafter. The Company's stockholders approved this Plan on May 4, 2018. From its effectiveness, this Plan shall continue in effect for a term of ten (10) years unless terminated earlier under Section 17 of this Plan. If the requisite stockholder approval is not obtained within such 12-month period, any Awards granted hereunder will automatically become null and void and of no force or effect. No Awards may be granted under this Plan on or after the date which is ten (10) years following the effective date of this Plan. This Plan will remain in effect until all Awards granted under the Plan have been satisfied or expired.
17.Amendment and Termination of this Plan.
(a)Amendment and Termination. The Board may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate this Plan.
(b)Stockholder Approval. The Company shall obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary to comply with Applicable Laws.
(c)Effect of Amendment or Termination. No amendment, alteration, suspension, or termination of this Plan shall materially or adversely impair the rights of any Participant without the Participant’s prior written consent, unless such action is required by Applicable Law or stock exchange rules. Termination of this Plan shall not affect the Administrator's ability to exercise the powers granted to it under this Plan with respect to Awards granted under this Plan prior to the date of termination.
(a)Legal Compliance. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Award unless the exercise of the Award and the issuance and delivery of such Shares shall comply with Applicable Laws.
(b)Taxes. No Shares shall be delivered under this Plan to any Participant or other person until the Participant or other person has made arrangements acceptable to the Administrator for the satisfaction of any non-U.S., U.S.-federal, U.S.-state, or local income and employment tax withholding obligations, including, without limitation, obligations incident to the receipt of Shares. Upon exercise or vesting of an Award, the Company shall withhold or collect from the Participant an amount sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations, including, but not limited to, by surrender of up to the whole number of Shares covered by the Award sufficient to satisfy the withholding obligations incident to the exercise or vesting of an Award based on the minimum supplemental rate in the applicable jurisdiction.
19.No Rights to Awards. No eligible Service Provider or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award pursuant to this Plan, and neither the Company nor the Administrator shall be obligated to treat Participants or any other person uniformly.
20.No Stockholder Rights. Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, a Participant shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by an Award until the Participant becomes the record owner of the Shares.
21.Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued and the Administrator shall determine, in its sole discretion, whether cash shall be given in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares shall be eliminated by rounding up or down as appropriate.
22.Governing Law. This Plan, all Award Agreements, and all related matters, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to choice of law principles that direct the application of the laws of another state.
23.No Effect on Terms of Employment or Consulting Relationship. This Plan shall not confer upon any Participant any right as a Service Provider, nor shall it interfere in any way with his or her right or the right of the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary to terminate the Participant's service at any time, with or without cause, and with or without notice.
24.Unfunded Obligation. This Section 24 shall only apply to Awards that are not settled in Shares. Participants shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts of cash payable to Participants pursuant to this Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Neither the Company nor any Parent or Subsidiary shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such
obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations under this Plan. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust for any Participant account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Administrator, the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary and Participant, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Participant or the Participant's creditors in any assets of the Company or Parent or Subsidiary. The Participants shall have no claim against the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary for any changes in the value of any assets that may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to this Plan.
25.No Guarantee of Tax Consequences. The Company, Board, Committee and the Administrator do not make any commitment or guarantee that any United States federal, state, local, or foreign tax treatment will apply or be available under the Plan to any Participant or other person participating or eligible to participate hereunder. Neither the Company, the Board, the Committee, nor the Administrator will be liable to any Participant or any other person as to any expected or realized tax consequences for any Participant or other person due to the grant, exercise, lapse of restriction, vesting, distribution, payment or other taxable event involving any Award. Although the Company may endeavor to (a) qualify an Award for favorable tax treatment in a jurisdiction or (b) avoid adverse tax treatment for an Award, the Company makes no representation to that effect and expressly disavows any covenant to maintain favorable or avoid unfavorable tax treatment.
26.Designation of Beneficiary by Participant. Each Participant may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his or her death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation will revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, must be in the form prescribed by the Administrator, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Administrator (or its delegate), and received and accepted during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such valid beneficiary designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death will be paid as follows: (i) if a Participant leaves a surviving spouse, payment will be made to such surviving spouse on behalf of the Participant; and (ii) if a Participant leaves no surviving spouse, payment will be made to (A) if there is administration of such Participant’s estate, the executor or administrator of such estate, upon receipt by the Administrator of supporting evidence from the estate that is satisfactory to the Administrator, or (B) if there is no administration of such Participant’s estate, to such Participant’s heirs at law, but only after such heirs are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction and in such proportion as determined by such court in its signed order that is received by, and satisfactory to, the Administrator.
27.Requirements of Law and Securities Exchanges. The granting of Awards and the issuance or delivery of Shares under the Plan will be subject to all Applicable Laws, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required. Certificates evidencing Shares delivered under the Plan (to the extent that such Shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Administrator may deem advisable under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Common Stock is then listed or to which it is admitted for quotation, and any other Applicable Law. The Administrator may cause a legend or legends to be placed upon such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
The Company will not be obligated to take any affirmative action in order to cause the exercise of an Award or the issuance of Shares pursuant to the Plan to comply with any Applicable Law. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Administrator or the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, will relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority has not been obtained.
28.Clawback. All compensation and Awards (including any proceeds, gains or other economic benefit the Participant actually or constructively receives upon receipt or exercise of any Award or other receipt or resale of any Shares underlying the Award) will be subject to any Company clawback
policy as may be implemented from time to time, including any clawback policy adopted to comply with any Applicable Law (including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) as set forth in such clawback policy or the Award Agreement. Any such policy may subject a Participant’s Award, and amounts paid or realized with respect to any Award, to reduction, cancelation, forfeiture or recoupment if certain specified events or wrongful conduct occur; such events including, but not limited to, an accounting restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with financial reporting regulations or other events or wrongful conduct specified in any such clawback policy.
29.No Obligation to Exercise Awards; No Right to Notice of Expiration Date. An Award of a Stock Option or a SAR imposes no obligation upon the Participant to exercise the Award. The Company and the Administrator have no obligation to inform a Participant of the date on which a Stock Option or SAR is no longer exercisable except for including such expiration date in the Participant’s Award Agreement.
30.Rule 16b-3 Securities Law Compliance for Insiders. Transactions under the Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3. Any ambiguities or inconsistencies in the construction of the Plan or an Award will be interpreted to give effect to such intention and, to the extent any provision of the Plan or action by the Administrator fails to so comply, it may be deemed null and void by the Administrator, in its discretion, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws.
(a)General. The Company intends that all Awards be structured to comply with, or be exempt from, Code Section 409A (“Section 409A”), such that no adverse tax consequences, interest, or penalties under Section 409A apply. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, the Administrator may, without a Participant’s consent, amend this Plan or Awards, adopt policies and procedures, or take any other actions (including amendments, policies, procedures and retroactive actions) as are necessary or appropriate to preserve the intended tax treatment of Awards, including any such actions intended to (i) exempt the Plan or any Award from Section 409A, or (ii) comply with Section 409A, including regulations, guidance, compliance programs and other interpretative authority that may be issued after an Award’s grant date. The Company makes no representations or warranties as to an Award’s tax treatment under Section 409A or otherwise. The Company and its Subsidiaries will have no obligation under this Section 31 or otherwise to avoid the taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A with respect to any Award and will have no liability to any Participant or any other person if any Award, compensation or other benefits under the Plan are determined to constitute noncompliant “nonqualified deferred compensation” subject to taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A.
(b)Separation from Service. If an Award constitutes “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A, any payment or settlement of such Award upon a termination of a Participant’s employment or consulting relationship will, to the extent necessary to avoid taxes under Section 409A, be made only upon the Participant’s “separation from service” (within the meaning of Section 409A), whether such “separation from service” occurs upon or after the termination of the Participant’s employment or consulting relationship. For purposes of the Plan or any Award Agreement relating to any such payments, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms means a “separation from service.”
(c)Payments to Specified Employees. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan or any Incentive Agreement, any payment(s) of “nonqualified deferred compensation” required to be made under an Award to a “specified employee” (as defined under Section 409A as determined by the Administrator) due to his or her “separation from service” will, to the extent necessary to avoid taxes under Code Section 409A(a)(1)(B)(i), be delayed for the six-month period immediately following such “separation from service” (or, if earlier, until the specified employee’s death) and will instead be paid (as set forth in the Award Agreement) on the day immediately following such six-month period or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter (without interest) but not later than 60 days following the end of such six-month period. Any payments of “nonqualified deferred compensation” under such Award payable
more than six months following the Participant’s “separation from service” will be paid at the time or times the payments are otherwise scheduled to be made.
(d)Payment Upon Vesting or Lapse of Risk of Forfeiture. In the case of an Award subject to Section 409A providing for distribution or settlement upon vesting or lapse of a risk of forfeiture, if the time of such distribution or settlement is not otherwise specified in this Plan or the Award Agreement or other governing document, the distribution or settlement shall be made by March 15 of the calendar year next following the calendar year in which such Award vested or the risk of forfeiture lapsed.
(e)Timing of Payment. In the case of any distribution of any other Award subject to Section 409A, if the timing of such distribution is not otherwise specified in this Plan or the Award Agreement or other governing document, the distribution shall be made not later than the end of the calendar year during which the settlement of the 409A Award is specified to occur.
(f)Separate Payment. Each payment that a Participant may receive under this Plan that is subject to Section 409A shall be treated as a “separate payment” for purposes of Section 409A.
32.No Restriction on Corporate Action. Nothing contained in the Plan will be construed to prevent the Company or any Subsidiary from taking any action which is deemed by the Company or such Subsidiary to be appropriate or in its best interest, whether or not such action would have an adverse effect on the Plan or any Award made under the Plan.
33.Severability. If any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction as to any person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or Award under any Applicable Law, such provision will be (a) construed or deemed amended to conform to Applicable Law or (b) if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Administrator, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision will be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or Award Agreement, and thereafter the remainder of the Plan and any such Award Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
34.Rules of Construction. In the interpretation of the Plan, except where the context otherwise requires:
(a)“including” or “include” does not denote or imply any limitation;
(b)“or” has the inclusive meaning “and/or”;
(c)the singular includes the plural, and vice versa, and each gender includes each of the others;
(d)captions or headings are only for reference and are not to be considered in interpreting the Plan;
(e)any grammatical form or variant of a term defined in the Plan will be construed to have a meaning corresponding to the definition of the term set forth herein;
(f)the terms “hereof,” “hereto,” “hereunder” and similar terms in the Plan refer to the Plan as a whole and not to any particular provision of the Plan;
(g)“Section” refers to a Section of the Plan, unless otherwise stated in the Plan;
(h)a reference to any statute, rule, or regulation includes any amendment thereto or any statute, rule, or regulation enacted or promulgated in replacement thereof, and the authoritative guidance issued thereunder by an appropriate governmental entity; and
(i)This Plan shall be construed as a whole and according to its fair meaning, and the Plan and any Award Agreement issued hereunder shall not be strictly construed against the Company or the Administrator.
* �� * * * *
A-21TETRA Technologies, Inc. GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS 24955 Interstate 45 North The Woodlands, TX 77380 +1281.367.1983 www.tetratec.com
Appendix B
2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
1.Purposes of this Plan. The primary purposes ofMMMMMMMMMMMM + C 1234567890 000004 MMMMMMM ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ MMMMMMMMM MR A SAMPLE Online DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 Go to www.envisionreports.com/TTI ADD 2 or scan the PlanQR code — login details are to (a) attract and retain Outside Directors of the Company by providing such individuals with a proprietary interestlocated ADD 3 in the Company through grantingshaded bar below. ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 Votes submitted electronically must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 23, 2022. StockholderMeetingNotice123456789012345 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of incentive awards in the form of Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Other Stock-Based Awards and cash-based awards; (b) increase the interest of Outside Directors in the Company’s welfare; and (c) furnish incentives to such individuals to continue their servicesProxy Materials for the Company.
2.Definitions. As used in this Plan, the following definitions shall apply:
(a)“Administrator” means the Board or the Committee that shall be administering this Plan, in accordance with Section 4 of this Plan.
(b)“Applicable Laws” means the requirements relating to the administration of equity-based awards or equity compensation plans under U.S. federal and state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, the Code, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under this Plan.
(c)“Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Other Stock‑Based Awards and cash-based awards.
(d)“Award Agreement” means the written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to each Award. An Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan.
(e)“Awarded Stock” means the Common Stock subject to an Award.
(f)“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(g)“Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i)Any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), but other than (A) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any affiliate, or (B) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Common Stock in the Company), becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities;
(ii)The sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets other than (A) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to a person or persons (as defined above) who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, at least fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company at the time of the sale or (B) pursuant to a spin-off type transaction, directly or indirectly, of such assets to the Company’s stockholders;
(iii)A change in the composition of the Board during any twelve (11) consecutive month period the result of which fewer than a majority of the Directors are Incumbent Directors. For this purpose, “Incumbent Directors” are Directors who are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election or nomination (but shall not include an individual whose election or nomination is in
connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of Directors to the Company); or
(iv)A merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.
(h) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder. Any reference to a section of the Code shall be deemed a reference to any successor or amended section of the Code.
(i)“Committee” means a committee of Directors or other individuals that satisfies Applicable Laws and was appointed by the Board in accordance with Section (d) of this Plan.
(j)“Common Stock” means the common stock, $0.01 par value per Share, of the Company.
(k)“Company” means TETRA Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor thereto.
(l)“Date of Grant” means the effective date on which an Award is granted by the Administrator to a Participant, or such later date as may be specified by the Administrator on the date the Administrator approves the Award, in each case as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement; provided, however, that for purposes of compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act or other Applicable Law, the Date of Grant will be the date of shareholder approval of the Plan if such date is later than the effective date of the Award, as applicable.
(m)“Director” means a member of the Board.
(n)“Disability” means Participant: (i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (11) months; or (ii) is determined by the Social Security Administration Stockholder Meeting to be disabled. For all purposes of this Section (m), the Participant shall not be considered to have incurred a “Disability” unless proof of such impairment, sufficient to satisfy the Administrator, in its sole discretion, is provided by orHeld on behalf of such Participant to the Administrator.
(o)“Dividend Equivalent” means a credit, made at the sole discretion of the Administrator, to the account of a Participant in an amount equal to the value of dividends paid on one Share for each Share represented by an Award held by such Participant.Tuesday, May 24, 2022 Under no circumstances shall the payment of a Dividend Equivalent be made contingent on the exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right. Additionally, Dividend Equivalents shall be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Award with respect to which they were paid.
(p)“Employee” means any person, including an officer, employed by the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company shall make the Director an Employee hereunder.
(q)“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(r)“Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:
(i)If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, the Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or system for the day of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;
(ii)If the Common Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock for the day of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable; or
(iii)In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall be determined in good faith by the Administrator.
(iv)Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, for federal, state, and local income tax reporting purposes, and for such other purposes as the Administrator deems appropriate, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Administrator in accordance with uniform and nondiscriminatory standards adopted by it from time to time.
(s)“Nonqualified Stock Option” means a stock option that by its terms does not qualify or is not intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.
(t)“Other Stock-Based Award” means any other award not specifically described in this Plan that is payable by delivery of Shares or valued, in whole or in part, by reference to, or are otherwise based on, Shares in accordance with Section 9 of this Plan.
(u)“Outside Director” means a Director of the Company who is not an Employee.
(v)“Parent” means an entity that is a parent to the Company as determined by the Board.
(w)“Participant” means an Outside Director who has been granted an Award under this Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Award.
(x)“Plan” means this 2018 Non-Employee Director Equity Incentive Plan. In accordance with Section 13, this Plan became effective on the date it was adopted by the Board, subject to the Company’s stockholders approval of this Plan.
(y)“Restricted Stock” means Shares issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award under Section (iv).
(z)“Restricted Stock Unit” means an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver Shares, cash, other securities or a combination thereof equal in value to the Fair Market Value of one Share in the Company on the date of vesting or settlement, or as otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, pursuant to Section 9.
(aa)“Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, or any successor to Rule 16b-3, as in effect when discretion is being exercised with respect to this Plan.
(bb)“Share” means a share of Common Stock, as may be adjusted in accordance with Section 11.
(cc)“Share Reserve” has the meaning set forth in Section 3(a).
(dd)“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver Shares, cash or other securities equal in value to the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share as of the date such SAR is exercised and the Fair Market Value of a Share as of its Date of Grant, or as otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, pursuant to Section 8.
(ee)“Subsidiary” means an entity that is a subsidiary of the Company as determined by the Board.
(a)Stock Subject to this Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 11, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to all Awards under this Plan is three hundred thirty-five thousand (335,000) Shares (as such number is adjusted from time to time under the terms of this Plan, the “Share Reserve”). Awards that may be settled only in cash shall not be counted against the Share reserve, nor shall they reduce the Shares authorized for grant to a Participant in any calendar year. Shares issued under this Plan may come from authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.
(b)Effect of Forfeitures and Other Actions. Any Shares subject to an Award that expires, is cancelled or forfeited or is settled for cash shall, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, again become available for Awards under this Plan, and the Share Reserve shall be correspondingly replenished. The following Shares shall not, however, again become available for Awards or replenish the Share Reserve: (i) Shares tendered by the Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of a Nonqualified Stock Option issued under this Plan, (ii) Shares repurchased by the Company with proceeds received from the exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option issued under this Plan, and (iii) Shares subject to a stock settled Stock Appreciation Right issued under this Plan that are not issued in connection with the settlement of that Award upon its exercise.
(c)Reserved Shares. The Company, during the term of this Plan, shall at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this Plan.
(d)No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares will be issued under the Plan, but the Administrator may, in its discretion, adopt any rounding convention it deems suitable or pay cash in lieu of any fractional Share in settlement of an Award.
(e)Annual Limits. No Outside Director may be granted during any calendar year Awards having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined on the Date of Grant, in excess of $300,000.
4.Administration of this Plan.
(i)General Administration; Establishment of Administrator. Subject to Applicable Laws and this Section (d), the Plan shall be administered by the Board or the Committee. Any member of the Committee may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by resolution of the Board. Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Committee may be filled by appointment by the Board. At any time there is no Committee to administer this Plan, any references in this Plan to the Committee shall be deemed to refer to the Board.
(ii)Membership on the Committee. The Committee shall consist of not fewer than two individuals. The members of the Committee shall be limited to those members of the Board who are “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3. The Committee shall select one of its members to act as its Chairman. A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and the act of a majority of the members of the Committee present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Committee.
(iii)Rule 16b-3. If a transaction is intended to be exempt under Rule 16b-3, then it shall be structured to satisfy the requirements for exemption under Rule 16b-3.
(b)Powers of the Administrator. Subject to (i) the provisions of this Plan and compliance with Applicable Laws, and (ii) in the case of a Committee, the specific duties delegated by the Board to the Committee, the Administrator shall have the authority, in its discretion, to take the following actions under the Plan:
(i)determine the Fair Market Value of Awards;
(ii)select the Outside Directors to whom Awards may be granted under this Plan;
(iii)determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted under this Plan;
(iv)determine when Awards are to be granted under this Plan and the applicable Date of Grant;
(v)approve forms of Award Agreements for use under this Plan;
(vi)determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, of any Award granted under this Plan including, but not limited to, the exercise price, the time or times when Awards may be exercised, any acceleration of vesting or waiver of forfeiture or repurchase restrictions, and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the Shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine;
(vii)construe and interpret the terms of this Plan and Award Agreements;
(viii)prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan, including rules and regulations relating to the creation and administration of sub-plans;
(ix)amend the terms of any outstanding Award, including the discretionary authority to extend the post‑termination exercise period of Awards and accelerate the satisfaction of any vesting criteria or waiver of forfeiture or repurchase restrictions, provided that any amendment that would adversely affect the Participant’s rights under an outstanding Award shall not be made without the Participant’s written consent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an amendment shall not be treated as adversely affecting the rights of the Participant if the amendment is made to the minimum extent necessary to avoid the adverse tax consequences to the Participant of Section 409A of the Code;
(x)allow Participants to satisfy withholding tax obligations by electing to have the Company withhold from the Shares or cash to be issued upon exercise or vesting of an Award up to the number of Shares or cash having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld based on any amount up to the minimum supplemental income tax rate in the applicable jurisdiction. The Fair Market Value of any Shares to be withheld shall be determined on the date that the amount of the tax to be withheld is to be determined, and all elections by a Participant to have Shares or cash withheld for this purpose shall be made in such form and under such conditions as the Administrator may deem necessary or advisable;
(xi)authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Administrator;
(xii)allow a Participant to defer the receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to the Participant under an Award to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code;
(xiii)determine whether Awards shall be settled in Shares, cash or in a combination of Shares and cash;
(xiv)determine whether Awards shall be adjusted for dividends or Dividend Equivalents; provided, however, that to the extent an Award is to be settled in Shares, any dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall not be issued or granted with respect to unvested Awards, and instead shall be held by the Company and delivered to the Participant, if at all, only upon such Award becoming vested;
(xv)create Other Stock-Based Awards for issuance under this Plan;
(xvi)impose such restrictions, conditions or limitations as it determines appropriate with respect to the timing and manner of any resales by a Participant or other subsequent transfers by a Participant of any Shares issued as a result of or under an Award, including without limitation, (A) restrictions under an insider trading policy and (B) restrictions as to the use of a specified brokerage firm for such resales or other transfers;
(xvii)to the extent consistent with Section 409A of the Code, establish one or more programs under this Plan to permit selected Participants the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of consideration upon exercise of an Award or other event that, absent the election, would entitle the Participant to payment or receipt of Shares or other consideration under an Award;
(xviii)to interpret, administer, reconcile any inconsistency in, correct any defect in, and/or supply any omission under, this Plan or any Award Agreement or other instrument or agreement relating to an Award; and
(xix)make all other determinations that the Administrator deems necessary or advisable for administering this Plan.
The express grant in this Plan of any specific power to the Administrator shall not be construed as limiting any power or authority of the Administrator. However, the Administrator may not exercise any right or power reserved to the Board under the express terms of this Plan or by Applicable Laws.
(c)Prohibition on Repricing of Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, no repricing of Nonqualified Stock Options or SARs may be effectuated without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders; provided, however, that the foregoing prohibition shall not apply to the extent an adjustment is required under Section 11.
(d)Effect of Administrator’s Decision. The Administrator’s decisions, determinations, actions and interpretations shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons having an interest under this Plan.
(e)Indemnification. The Company shall defend and indemnify all past and present members of the Board, the Committee, the Administrator, officers and Employees of the Company or of a Parent or Subsidiary to whom authority to act for the Board, the Committee, the Administrator or the Company has been delegated under this Plan (“Indemnitees”), to the maximum extent permitted by law, against (i) all reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the defense of any claim, investigation, action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein (collectively, a “Claim”), to which any of them is a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act in connection with this Plan, or in connection with any Award granted under this Plan; and (ii) all amounts required to be paid by them in settlement of a Claim (provided the settlement is approved by the Company) or required to be paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any Claim. However, no such person shall be entitled to indemnification to the extent it is determined in such Claim that such person did not in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the Company (or in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reason to believe that the conduct complained of was unlawful). In addition, to be entitled to indemnification, the Indemnitee must, within thirty (29) days after written
notice of the Claim, offer the Company, in writing, the opportunity, at the Company's expense, to defend the Claim. The right to indemnification shall be in addition to all other rights of indemnification available to the Indemnitee.
5.Eligibility. Awards under the Plan may only be granted to Outside Directors.
(a)Grant of Nonqualified Stock Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Administrator, at any time and from time to time, may grant Nonqualified Stock Options to Outside Directors in such amounts as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(b)Option Agreement. Each Award of a Nonqualified Stock Option shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Date of Grant, exercise price, the term of the Nonqualified Stock Option, the number of Shares subject to the Nonqualified Stock Option, the exercise restrictions (if any) applicable to the Nonqualified Stock Option, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(c)Term of Nonqualified Stock Option. The term of each Nonqualified Stock Option shall be stated in the Award Agreement.
(d)Nonqualified Stock Option Exercise Price and Consideration.
(i)Exercise Price. The per Share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option shall be determined by the Administrator, subject to the following:
(1)The per Share exercise price shall be determined by the Administrator, but shall not be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant unless the terms of such Nonqualified Stock Option would otherwise comply with the exemption from taxation under Section 409A of the Code.
(2)Notwithstanding the foregoing, Nonqualified Stock Options may be granted with a per Share exercise price of less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant pursuant to a transaction described in, and in a manner consistent with, Section 424(a) of the Code.
(ii)Waiting Period and Exercise Dates. At the time a Nonqualified Stock Option is granted, the Administrator shall fix the period within which the Nonqualified Stock Option may be exercised and shall determine any conditions that must be satisfied before the Nonqualified Stock Option may be exercised. The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the satisfaction of such conditions at any time.
(e)Form of Consideration. The Administrator shall determine the acceptable form of consideration for exercising a Nonqualified Stock Option, including the method of payment. Such consideration, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, may consist entirely of:
(iii)in the discretion of the Administrator, other Shares which meet the conditions established by the Administrator to avoid adverse accounting consequences;
(iv)in the discretion of the Administrator, consideration received by the Company under a cashless exercise or net exercise program implemented by the Company in connection with this Plan;
(v)in the discretion of the Administrator, any combination of the foregoing methods of payment; or
(vi)in the discretion of the Administrator, any other consideration and method of payment for the issuance of Shares permitted by Applicable Laws.
(f)Exercise of Nonqualified Stock Option.
(i)Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Stockholder. Any Nonqualified Stock Option granted under this Plan shall be exercisable according to the terms of this Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Administrator and set forth in the Award Agreement. A Nonqualified Stock Option shall be deemed exercised when the Company receives: (A) written or electronic notice of exercise (in accordance with the Award Agreement) from the person entitled to exercise the Nonqualified Stock Option, and (B) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Nonqualified Stock Option is exercised (including provision for any applicable tax withholding). Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Administrator and permitted by the Award Agreement and this Plan. Shares issued upon exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option shall be issued in the name of the Participant or, if requested by the Participant, in the name of the Participant and his or her spouse. Until the Shares are issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder shall exist with respect to the Awarded Stock, notwithstanding the exercise of the Nonqualified Stock Option. The Company shall issue (or cause to be issued) such Shares promptly after the Nonqualified Stock Option is exercised. No adjustment shall be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the Shares are issued, except as provided in Section 11 or the applicable Award Agreement. Exercising a Nonqualified Stock Option in any manner shall decrease the number of Shares thereafter available for purchase under the Nonqualified Stock Option by the number of Shares as to which the Nonqualified Stock Option is exercised.
(ii)Termination of Relationship as an Outside Director (Other Than Death or Disability). If a Participant ceases to be an Outside Director, other than upon the Participant’s death or Disability, the Participant may exercise the vested portion of his or her Nonqualified Stock Option within the time period specified in the Award Agreement (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Nonqualified Stock Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). If the Award Agreement does not specify a time period within which the vested portion of such Nonqualified Stock Option must be exercised following a Participant ceasing to be an Outside Director, the vested portion of such Nonqualified Stock Option shall be exercisable for three (3) months following his or her cessation of service as an Outside Director (other than upon the Participant’s death or Disability). Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Nonqualified Stock Option on the date he or she ceases to be an Outside Director (other than upon the Participant’s death or Disability), then immediately thereafter, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3. Additionally, if the Participant does not exercise his or her Nonqualified Stock Option as to all of the vested Shares within the specified time period, then immediately thereafter, the Nonqualified Stock Option shall terminate and the Shares covered by the unexercised portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(iii)Disability of Participant. If a Participant ceases to be an Outside Director as a result of his or her Disability, the Participant may exercise the vested portion of his or her Nonqualified Stock Option within the time period specified in the Award Agreement (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the Nonqualified Stock Option as set forth in the Award Agreement). If the Award Agreement does not specify a time period within which the vested portion of such Nonqualified
Stock Option must be exercised following a Participant ceasing to be an Outside Director as a result of his or her Disability, the vested portion of such Nonqualified Stock Option shall be exercisable for twelve (11) months following the Participant ceasing to be an Outside Director as a result of his or her Disability. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Nonqualified Stock Option on the date he or she ceases to be an Outside Director as a result of his or her Disability, then immediately thereafter, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3. Additionally, if the Participant does not exercise his or her Nonqualified Stock Option as to all of the vested Shares within the specified time period, then immediately thereafter, the Nonqualified Stock Option shall terminate and the Shares covered by the unexercised portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(iv)Death of Participant. If a Participant dies while an Outside Director, the vested portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option may be exercised within the time period specified in the Award Agreement (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the Nonqualified Stock Option as set forth in the Award Agreement), by the beneficiary designated by the Participant prior to his or her death in accordance with Section 25. If the Award Agreement does not specify a time period within which the vested portion of such Nonqualified Stock Option must be exercised following a Participant’s death, the vested portion of such Nonqualified Stock Option shall be exercisable for twelve (11) months following his or her date of death. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, if the Participant is not vested as to his or her entire Nonqualified Stock Option on the date he or she ceases to be an Outside Director as a result of his or her death, then immediately thereafter, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option shall again be available for grants under this Plan as set forth in Section 3. Additionally, if the Participant’s beneficiary designated pursuant to Section 25 does not exercise the Nonqualified Stock Option as to all of the vested Shares within the specified time period, then immediately thereafter, the Nonqualified Stock Option shall terminate and the Shares covered by the unexercised portion of the Nonqualified Stock Option shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
7.Restricted Stock.
(a)Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, the Administrator, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Outside Directors in such amounts as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(b)Restricted Stock Agreement. Each Award of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the number of Shares granted, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(c)Removal of Restrictions. The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the time at which any restrictions shall lapse or be removed.
(d)Voting Rights. Outside Directors holding Shares of Restricted Stock may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise as set forth in the Award Agreement.
(e)Dividends and Other Distributions. Shares of Restricted Stock shall be entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to such Shares. All such dividends and distributions shall be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were paid and no such dividends or other distributions shall be issued or granted with respect to shares of Restricted Stock, and instead shall be held by the Company and delivered to the Participant, if at all, only upon such Awards becoming vested.
(f)Return of Restricted Stock to Company. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, the Restricted Stock for which restrictions have not lapsed shall again be available for grant under this Plan as set forth in Section 3.
(a)Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, a SAR may be granted to an Outside Director at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion. The Administrator shall have complete discretion to determine the number of SARs granted to any Outside Director. The Administrator shall have complete discretion to determine the terms and conditions of SARs granted under this Plan, including the sole discretion to accelerate exercisability at any time; provided, however, that the per Share exercise price that will determine the amount of the payment the Company receives upon exercise of a SAR shall not be less than the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.
(b)SAR Agreement. Each SAR grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Date of Grant, exercise price, the term, the conditions of exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
(c)Expiration of SARs. A SAR granted under this Plan shall expire upon the date determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, as set forth in the Award Agreement; provided, however, no SAR shall be exercisable later than 10 years after the Date of Grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rules of Sections (i), (ii) and (iii) shall also apply to SARs.
(d)Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise of a SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
(i)The difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the exercise price; times
(ii)The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.
At the sole discretion of the Administrator, the payment upon the exercise of a SAR may be in cash, in Shares of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof.
9.Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units shall consist of Shares of Restricted Stock that the Administrator, in its sole discretion, permits to be paid out in a lump sum, installments or on a deferred basis, in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Administrator.
10.Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards. Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, other Awards granted under this Plan and/or cash awards made outside of this Plan. The Administrator shall have authority to determine the Outside Directors to whom, and the time or times at which, Other Stock-Based Awards shall be made, the amount of such Other Stock-Based Awards, and all other terms and conditions of the Other Stock-Based Awards, including any dividend or voting rights and whether the Award should be paid in cash. Cash-based awards may be granted in such amounts and subject to such other terms as the Administrator, in its discretion, determines to be appropriate.
11.Non-Transferability of Awards. Unless determined otherwise by the Administrator, an Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner, other than as provided in Section 25 or by will or by the laws of descent or distribution following the Participant’s death. An outstanding Award may be exercised during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant. If the Administrator makes an Award transferable, such Award Agreement shall contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate.
12.Adjustments; Dissolution or Liquidation; Change in Control.
(a)Adjustments for Changes in Capitalization. In the event of any equity restructuring (within the meaning of FASB ASC Topic 718) that causes the per share value of Shares to
change, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through an extraordinary dividend, the Administrator shall make such adjustments as it deems equitable and appropriate to (i) the aggregate number and kind of Shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance under this Plan, (ii) the number and kind of Shares or other securities subject to outstanding Awards, and (iii) the exercise price of outstanding Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, including a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such equitable adjustments described in the foregoing sentence may be made as determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights of Participants. In either case, any such adjustment shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes of this Plan. No adjustment shall be made pursuant to this Section 11 in connection with the conversion of any convertible securities of the Company, or in a manner that would cause an Award to be subject to adverse tax consequences under Section 409A of the Code.
(b)Change in Control. Unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, the following provisions shall apply to outstanding Awards in the event of a Change in Control:
(i)all outstanding Awards of Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable for such period of time prior to the effective time of the Change in Control as is deemed fair and equitable by the Administrator, and shall terminate at the effective time of the Change in Control;
(ii)all outstanding Awards other than Awards of Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall fully vest immediately prior to the effective time of the Change in Control.
The Administrator shall provide written notice of the period of accelerated exercisability of Nonqualified Stock Option and SAR Awards to all affected Participants. The exercise of any Nonqualified Stock Option or SAR Award whose exercisability is accelerated as provided in this Section (b) shall be conditioned upon the consummation of the Change in Control and shall be effective only immediately before such consummation.
(c)Dissolution or Liquidation. Unless otherwise provided in an applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Administrator will notify each Participant as soon as practicable prior to the effective date of such proposed transaction. An Award will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action.
13.Board and Stockholder Approval; Term of Plan. The Board approved this Plan to be effective on March 15, 2018, subject to the Company’s stockholders approving this Plan. The Company’s stockholders approved this Plan on May 4, 2018. From its effectiveness, this Plan shall continue in effect for a term of ten (9) years unless terminated earlier under Section 13 of this Plan. If the requisite stockholder approval is not obtained, any Awards granted hereunder will automatically become null and void and of no force or effect. No Awards may be granted under the Plan on or after the date which is ten (9) years following the effective date of this Plan. This Plan will remain in effect until all Awards granted under the Plan have been satisfied or expired.
14.Amendment and Termination of this Plan.
(a)Amendment and Termination. The Board may, at any time, amend, alter, suspend or terminate this Plan.
(b)Stockholder Approval. The Company shall obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary to comply with Applicable Laws.
(c)Effect of Amendment or Termination. No amendment, alteration, suspension, or termination of this Plan shall materially or adversely impair the rights of any Participant without the
Participant’s prior written consent, unless such action is required by Applicable Law or stock exchange rules. Termination of this Plan shall not affect the Administrator’s ability to exercise the powers granted to it under this Plan with respect to Awards granted under this Plan prior to the date of termination.
15.Conditions upon Issuance of Shares.
(a)Legal Compliance. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Award unless the exercise of the Award and the issuance and delivery of such Shares shall comply with Applicable Laws.
(b)Taxes. No Shares shall be delivered under this Plan to any Participant or other person until the Participant or other person has made arrangements acceptable to the Administrator for the satisfaction of any non-U.S., U.S.-federal, U.S.-state, or local income and employment tax withholding obligations, including, without limitation, obligations incident to the receipt of Shares. Upon exercise or vesting of an Award, the Company shall withhold or collect from the Participant an amount sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations, including, but not limited to, by surrender of up to the whole number of Shares covered by the Award sufficient to satisfy the withholding obligations incident to the exercise or vesting of an Award based on the minimum supplemental rate in the applicable jurisdiction.
16.No Rights to Awards. No eligible Outside Director or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award pursuant to this Plan, and neither the Company nor the Administrator shall be obligated to treat Participants or any other person uniformly.
17.No Stockholder Rights. Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, a Participant shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by an Award until the Participant becomes the record owner of the Shares.
18.Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued and the Administrator shall determine, in its discretion, whether cash shall be given in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares shall be eliminated by rounding up or down as appropriate.
19.Governing Law. This Plan, all Award Agreements, and all related matters, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to choice of law principles that direct the application of the laws of another state.
20.No Effect on Terms of Directorship Relationship. This Plan shall not confer upon any Participant any right to continue service as an Outside Director, nor shall it interfere in any way with his or her right or the right of the Company to terminate the Participant’s service at any time, with or without cause, and with or without notice.
21.Unfunded Obligation. This Section 20 shall only apply to Awards that are not settled in Shares. Participants shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts of cash payable to Participants pursuant to this Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Neither the Company nor any Parent or Subsidiary shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations under this Plan. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust for any Participant account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Administrator, the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary and Participant, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Participant or the Participant's creditors in any assets of the Company or Parent or Subsidiary. The Participants shall have no claim against the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary for any changes in the value of any assets that may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to this Plan.
22.No Guarantee of Tax Consequences. The Company, Board, Committee and the Administrator do not make any commitment or guarantee that any United States federal, state, local, or foreign tax treatment will apply or be available under the Plan to any Participant or other person participating or eligible to participate hereunder. Neither the Company, the Board, the Committee nor the Administrator will be liable to any Participant or any other person as to any expected or realized tax consequences for any Participant or other person due to the grant, exercise, lapse of restriction, vesting, distribution, payment or other taxable event involving any Award. Although the Company may endeavor to (a) qualify an Award for favorable tax treatment in a jurisdiction or (b) avoid adverse tax treatment for an Award, the Company makes no representation to that effect and expressly disavows any covenant to maintain favorable or avoid unfavorable tax treatment.
23.Designation of Beneficiary by Participant. Each Participant may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his or her death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation will revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, must be in the form prescribed by the Administrator, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Administrator (or its delegate), and received and accepted during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such valid beneficiary designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death will be paid as follows: (i) if a Participant leaves a surviving spouse, payment will be made to such surviving spouse on behalf of the Participant; and (ii) if a Participant leaves no surviving spouse, payment will be made to (A) if there is administration of such Participant’s estate, the executor or administrator of such estate, upon receipt by the Administrator of supporting evidence from the estate that is satisfactory to the Administrator, or (B) if there is no administration of such Participant’s estate, to such Participant’s heirs at law, but only after such heirs are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction and in such proportion as determined by such court in its signed order that is received by, and satisfactory to, the Administrator.
24.Requirements of Law and Securities Exchanges. The granting of Awards and the issuance or delivery of Shares under the Plan will be subject to all Applicable Laws, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required. Certificates evidencing Shares delivered under the Plan (to the extent that such Shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Administrator may deem advisable under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission any securities exchangerules, you are receiving this notice that the proxy materials for the annual stockholders’ meeting are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or transaction reporting system upon which the Common Stock is then listed or to which it is admitted for quotation, and any other Applicable Law.request a copy. The Administrator may cause a legend or legendsitems to be placed upon such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
The Company will not be obligated to take any affirmative action in order to cause the exercise of an Award or the issuance of Shares pursuant to the Plan to comply with any Applicable Law. The inabilityvoted on and location of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authorityannual meeting are on the reverse side. Your vote is deemed by the Administrator or the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, will relieve the Company of any liability in respectimportant! This communication presents only an overview of the failuremore complete proxy materials that are available to issueyou on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The 2022 proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at: www.envisionreports.com/TTI Easy Online Access — View your proxy materials and vote. Step 1: Go to www.envisionreports.com/TTI. Step 2: Click on Cast Your Vote or sell such SharesRequest Materials. Step 3: Follow the instructions on the screen to log in. Step 4: Make your selections as instructed on each screen for your delivery preferences. Step 5: Vote your shares. When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to which such requisite authority has not been obtained.
25.Clawback. All Awards (including any proceeds, gainsreceive electronic delivery of future materials. Obtaining a Copy of the Proxy Materials – If you want to receive a copy of the proxy materials, you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request as instructed on the reverse side on or other economic benefit the Participant actually or constructively receives upon receipt or exercise of any Award or other receipt or resale of any Shares underlying the Award) will be subjectbefore May 12, 2022 to any Company clawback policy as may be implemented from time to time, including any clawback policy adopted to comply with any Applicable Law (including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) as set forth in such clawback policy or the Award Agreement. Any such policy may subject a Participant’s Award, and amounts paid or realized with respect to any Award, to reduction, cancelation, forfeiture or recoupment if certain specified events or wrongful conduct occur; such events including, but not limited to, an accounting restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with financial reporting regulations or other events or wrongful conduct specified in any such clawback policy.facilitate timely delivery. 2NOT COY + 03LP1B
Stockholder Meeting Notice TETRA Technologies, Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Tuesday, May 24, 2022, at the TETRA Technologies Corporate Headquarters Building, 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas, at 11:00 a.m. Local Time. Proposals to Exercise Awards; No Rightbe voted on at the meeting are listed below along with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, and makes no recommendation on Proposal 4. 1. To elect seven directors to Noticeserve one-year terms ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Expiration Date. An AwardStockholders, or until their successors have been duly elected or appointed. Nominees: 01) Mark E. Baldwin 02) Thomas R. Bates, Jr. 03) John F. Glick 04) Gina A. Luna 05) Brady M. Murphy 06) Sharon B. McGee 07) Shawn D. Williams 2. To ratify and approve the appointment of a Nonqualified Stock Option or a SAR imposes no obligation uponGrant Thornton LLP as TETRA’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Participant to exercisefiscal year ending December 31, 2022. 3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the Award. The Company and the Administrator have no obligation to inform a Participantcompensation of the datenamed executive officers of TETRA Technologies, Inc 4. To vote on which a Nonqualified Stock Optionstockholder proposal entitled, “Proposal 4 – Simple Majority Vote,” if properly presented at the meeting. PLEASE NOTE – YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must vote online or SAR is no longer exercisable except for including such expiration daterequest a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the meeting, please bring this notice with you. You may obtain directions to the location of the 2022 annual meeting by contacting our Investor Relations Department at 281-367-1983 or at the Investor Relations area of our website at www.tetratec.com. Here’s how to order a copy of the proxy materials and select delivery preferences: Current and future delivery requests can be submitted using the options below. If you request an email copy, you will receive an email with a link to the current meeting materials. PLEASE NOTE: You must use the number in the Participant’s Award Agreement.shaded bar on the reverse side when requesting a copy of the proxy materials. — Internet – Go to www.envisionreports.com/TTI. Click Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. — Phone – Call us free of charge at 1-866-641-4276. — Email – Send an email to investorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials TETRA Technologies, Inc.” in the subject line. Include your full name and address, plus the number located in the shaded bar on the reverse side, and state that you want a paper copy of the meeting materials. To facilitate timely delivery, all requests for a paper copy of proxy materials must be received by May 12, 2022.
27.Rule 16b-3 Securities Law Compliance for Insiders. Transactions under the Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3. Any ambiguities or inconsistencies in the construction of the Plan or an Award will be interpreted to give effect to such intention and, to the extent any provision of the Plan or action by the Administrator fails to so comply, it may be deemed null and void by the Administrator, in its discretion, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws.
28.Section 409A.
(a)General. The Company intends that all Awards be structured to comply with, or be exempt from, Code Section 409A (“Section 409A”), such that no adverse tax consequences, interest, or penalties under Section 409A apply. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, the Administrator may, without a Participant’s consent, amend this Plan or Awards, adopt policies and procedures, or take any other actions (including amendments, policies, procedures and retroactive actions) as are necessary or appropriate to preserve the intended tax treatment of Awards, including any such actions intended to (i) exempt the Plan or any Award from Section 409A, or (ii) comply with Section 409A, including regulations, guidance, compliance programs and other interpretative authority that may be issued after an Award’s grant date. The Company makes no representations or warranties as to an Award’s tax treatment under Section 409A or otherwise. The Company and its Subsidiaries will have no obligation under this Section 30 or otherwise to avoid the taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A with respect to any Award and will have no liability to any Participant or any other person if any Award, compensation or other benefits under the Plan are determined to constitute noncompliant “nonqualified deferred compensation” subject to taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A.
(b)Separation from Service. If an Award constitutes “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A, any payment or settlement of such Award upon a termination of a Participant’s directorship relationship will, to the extent necessary to avoid taxes under Section 409A, be made only upon the Participant’s “separation from service” (within the meaning of Section 409A), whether such “separation from service” occurs upon or after the termination of the Participant’s directorship relationship. For purposes of the Plan or any Award Agreement relating to any such payments, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms means a “separation from service.”
(c)Payments to Specified Employees. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan or any Incentive Agreement, any payment(s) of “nonqualified deferred compensation” required to be made under an Award to a “specified employee” (as defined under Section 409A as determined by the Administrator) due to his or her “separation from service” will, to the extent necessary to avoid taxes under Code Section 409A(a)(1)(B)(i), be delayed for the six-month period immediately following such “separation from service” (or, if earlier, until the specified employee’s death) and will instead be paid (as set forth in the Award Agreement) on the day immediately following such six-month period or as soon as administratively practicable thereafter (without interest) but not later than 60 days following the end of such six-month period. Any payments of “nonqualified deferred compensation” under such Award payable more than six months following the Participant’s “separation from service” will be paid at the time or times the payments are otherwise scheduled to be made.
(d)Payment Upon Vesting or Lapse of Risk of Forfeiture. In the case of an Award subject to Section 409A providing for distribution or settlement upon vesting or lapse of a risk of forfeiture, if the time of such distribution or settlement is not otherwise specified in this Plan or the Award Agreement
or other governing document, the distribution or settlement shall be made by March 15 of the calendar year next following the calendar year in which such Award vested or the risk of forfeiture lapsed.
(e)Timing of Payment. In the case of any distribution of any other Award subject to Section 409A, if the timing of such distribution is not otherwise specified in this Plan or the Award Agreement or other governing document, the distribution shall be made not later than the end of the calendar year during which the settlement of the 409A Award is specified to occur.
(f)Separate Payment. Each payment that a Participant may receive under this Plan that is subject to Section 409A shall be treated as a “separate payment” for purposes of Section 409A.
29.No Restriction on Corporate Action. Nothing contained in the Plan will be construed to prevent the Company or any Subsidiary from taking any action which is deemed by the Company or such Subsidiary to be appropriate or in its best interest, whether or not such action would have an adverse effect on the Plan or any Award made under the Plan.
30.Severability. If any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction as to any person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or Award under any Applicable Law, such provision will be (a) construed or deemed amended to conform to Applicable Law or (b) if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Administrator, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision will be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or Award Agreement, and thereafter the remainder of the Plan and any such Award Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
31.Rules of Construction. In the interpretation of the Plan, except where the context otherwise requires:
(a)“including” or “include” does not denote or imply any limitation;
(b)“or” has the inclusive meaning “and/or”;
(c)the singular includes the plural, and vice versa, and each gender includes each of the others;
(d)captions or headings are only for reference and are not to be considered in interpreting the Plan;
(e)any grammatical form or variant of a term defined in the Plan will be construed to have a meaning corresponding to the definition of the term set forth herein;
(f)the terms “hereof,” “hereto,” “hereunder” and similar terms in the Plan refer to the Plan as a whole and not to any particular provision of the Plan;
(g)“Section” refers to a Section of the Plan, unless otherwise stated in the Plan;
(h)a reference to any statute, rule, or regulation includes any amendment thereto or any statute, rule, or regulation enacted or promulgated in replacement thereof, and the authoritative guidance issued thereunder by an appropriate governmental entity; and
(i)This Plan shall be construed as a whole and according to its fair meaning, and the Plan and any Award Agreement issued hereunder shall not be strictly construed against the Company or the Administrator.
* * * * *